• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of the VersaTREK blood culture system against the Bactec9240 system in patients with suspected bloodstream infections.比较 VersaTREK 血培养系统与 Bactec9240 系统在疑似血流感染患者中的应用。
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2011 Feb 5;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-10-4.
2
Controlled clinical comparison of VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT blood culture systems.VersaTREK和BacT/ALERT血培养系统的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb;45(2):299-302. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01697-06. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
3
Comparison of time to positivity of the VersaTREK® REDOX 80-mL and the REDOX EZ draw 40-mL blood culture bottles for common bacterial bloodstream pathogens.比较 VersaTREK® REDOX 80-mL 和 REDOX EZ draw 40-mL 血培养瓶对常见细菌性血流感染病原体的阳性时间。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;71(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood.BacT/ALERT标准需氧培养基与BACTEC标准需氧培养基用于血液培养的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jun;41(6):2391-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2391-2394.2003.
5
Comparison of Microorganism Detection and Time to Positivity in Pediatric and Standard Media from Three Major Commercial Continuously Monitored Blood Culture Systems.三种主要商业连续监测血培养系统中儿科与标准培养基的微生物检测和阳性时间比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0042921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00429-21.
6
Recovery and time to growth of isolates in blood culture bottles: comparison of BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and BD Bactec Plus Anaerobic/F bottles.血培养瓶中分离株的恢复情况及生长时间:BD Bactec Plus需氧/F瓶与BD Bactec Plus厌氧/F瓶的比较
Scand J Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;46(4):288-93. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2013.876510. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
7
Comparison of Growth Performance of the BacT/ALERT VIRTUO and BACTEC FX Blood Culture Systems Under Simulated Bloodstream Infection Conditions.在模拟血流感染条件下BacT/ALERT VIRTUO和BACTEC FX血培养系统的生长性能比较
Clin Lab. 2017 Jan 1;63(1):39-46. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160502.
8
Comparison of the BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to the isolator tube, BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle, and BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle and comparison of the BACTEC Plus Aerobic F/bottle to the Isolator tube for recovery of bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi from blood.比较BACTEC MYCO/F溶解瓶与隔离管、BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶以及BACTEC厌氧溶解/10瓶,以及比较BACTEC Plus需氧F/瓶与隔离管从血液中分离细菌、分枝杆菌和真菌的能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4380-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4380-4386.2001.
9
PCR evaluation of false-positive signals from two automated blood-culture systems.两种自动血培养系统假阳性信号的聚合酶链反应评估
J Med Microbiol. 2006 Jan;55(Pt 1):53-57. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46196-0.
10
Evaluation of BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia in ICU patients.评价 BACTEC Plus 需氧和厌氧血培养瓶与 BacT/Alert FAN 需氧和厌氧血培养瓶对 ICU 患者菌血症的检测。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Jul;73(3):239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.03.022. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis.脓毒症诊断中分子生物学和其他非培养方法的时代。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010 Jan;23(1):235-51. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00043-09.
2
Microbiological patterns in sepsis: what happened in the last 20 years?脓毒症的微生物模式:过去 20 年发生了什么?
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34 Suppl 4:S5-8. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(09)70557-6.
3
Blood culture systems: rapid detection--how and why?血培养系统:快速检测——方法及原理
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34 Suppl 4:S13-5. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(09)70559-X.
4
Bloodstream infections: evolution and trends in the microbiology workload, incidence, and etiology, 1985-2006.血流感染:1985 - 2006年微生物学工作量、发病率及病因的演变与趋势
Medicine (Baltimore). 2008 Jul;87(4):234-249. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e318182119b.
5
Blood culture time to positivity as a predictor of mortality in community acquired methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.血培养阳性时间作为社区获得性甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症死亡率的预测指标
J Infect. 2008 Apr;56(4):295-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
6
Controlled clinical comparison of VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT blood culture systems.VersaTREK和BacT/ALERT血培养系统的对照临床比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Feb;45(2):299-302. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01697-06. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
7
Comparative evaluation of BacT/ALERT 3D and BACTEC systems for the recovery of pathogens causing bloodstream infections.BacT/ALERT 3D系统与BACTEC系统用于分离引起血流感染病原体的比较评估
Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(3):223-7. doi: 10.1159/000092186.
8
Time to blood culture positivity as a predictor of clinical outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection.血培养阳性时间作为金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染临床结局的预测指标。
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Apr;44(4):1342-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1342-1346.2006.
9
Time to positivity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: possible correlation with the source and outcome of infection.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的阳性时间:与感染源和结局的可能相关性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;41(5):594-8. doi: 10.1086/432472. Epub 2005 Jul 22.
10
Multicenter comparison of BACTEC 9050 and BACTEC 9240 blood culture systems.BACTEC 9050和BACTEC 9240血培养系统的多中心比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jun;36(6):1601-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.6.1601-1603.1998.

比较 VersaTREK 血培养系统与 Bactec9240 系统在疑似血流感染患者中的应用。

Comparison of the VersaTREK blood culture system against the Bactec9240 system in patients with suspected bloodstream infections.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria and Tshwane Academic Division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2011 Feb 5;10:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-10-4.

DOI:10.1186/1476-0711-10-4
PMID:21294908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3042901/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the VersaTREK (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, Ohio) blood culture system against the Bactec9240 (BD Microbiology, Cockeysville, MD), for the recovery of bloodstream pathogens.

METHODS

Venous blood from patients with suspected bacterial sepsis was evenly distributed into bottles of each system. Positive signals were recorded and bottles processed onto standard media for organism recovery. False positive signals were regarded if no organisms were seen on Gram stain and no growth was observed.

RESULTS

177 bottles were available for analysis; the Bactec9240 system yielded 43 positive, 134 negative results and no false positive signals. The VersaTREK system had 58 positive signals with 14 being false positives.

CONCLUSIONS

In our setting with high background burden of immuno-compromised patients, the VersaTREK system compared favourably with the Bactec9240 in recovering blood stream aerobic and facultative anaerobic pathogens from patients with suspected bacterial sepsis. A concern is the high false positivity rate. Due to its versatility to accommodate small and large workloads as well as using smaller volumes of blood, this system may establish itself as a useful alternative for the recovery of bloodstream pathogens.

摘要

背景

评估 VersaTREK(TREK 诊断系统,俄亥俄州克利夫兰)与 Bactec9240(BD 微生物学,马里兰州考克斯堡)血培养系统对血流感染病原体的检测能力。

方法

将疑似菌血症患者的静脉血均匀分配到各系统的培养瓶中。记录阳性信号,并将培养瓶按标准方法处理以进行病原体回收。如果革兰氏染色未见病原体且无生长,则视为假阳性信号。

结果

共分析了 177 个培养瓶;Bactec9240 系统得到 43 个阳性、134 个阴性和 0 个假阳性结果。VersaTREK 系统有 58 个阳性信号,其中 14 个为假阳性。

结论

在我们这种免疫功能低下患者背景负担较高的环境中,VersaTREK 系统与 Bactec9240 系统相比,从疑似细菌性败血症患者中检测到血流需氧和兼性厌氧病原体的能力较好。一个关注点是较高的假阳性率。由于其多功能性,可适应小和大工作量以及使用较小体积的血液,该系统可能成为检测血流感染病原体的有用替代方法。