• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种主要商业连续监测血培养系统中儿科与标准培养基的微生物检测和阳性时间比较。

Comparison of Microorganism Detection and Time to Positivity in Pediatric and Standard Media from Three Major Commercial Continuously Monitored Blood Culture Systems.

机构信息

Department of Pathology & Immunology, Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0042921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00429-21.

DOI:10.1128/JCM.00429-21
PMID:33910963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8218758/
Abstract

New blood culture instrumentation and medium formulations have led to improved time to positivity (TTP) for positive blood cultures. Data regarding the necessity of pediatric blood culture bottles with contemporary blood culture systems are sparse. We compared performance of three commercial blood culture systems, evaluating impact of blood volumes in standard and pediatric blood culture media across systems. Simulated blood cultures with packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and three Gram-positive, four Gram-negative, and one anaerobic organism (final concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 19 CFU/ml blood) on the Virtuo, VersaTrek, and Bactec FX instruments were evaluated with FAN Plus, Redox, and Bactec Plus media, respectively. For each medium/instrument/organism combination, 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-ml blood volumes were evaluated in triplicate. Detection rate was not affected by blood volume. Aerobic organisms that demonstrated variable rates of detection were Kingella kingae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Bacteroides fragilis was detected in 83%, 100%, and 100% of Virtuo, VersaTrek, and Bactec anaerobic bottles, respectively. The average TTP of standard medium for aerobic organisms detected on Virtuo was decreased compared to those for VersaTrek (-2.3 h) and Bactec (-4.9 h). Compared to standard medium, detection rate and TTP were unchanged on Virtuo, while TTP was reduced with pediatric medium for 2/8 organisms tested on Bactec and 7/8 organisms on VersaTrek, illustrating the potential benefit of pediatric medium on VersaTrek or Bactec when low blood volumes (<5 ml) are collected. These results demonstrate that TTP is decreased on the Virtuo compared to VersaTrek and Bactec for many microorganisms associated with bloodstream infection (BSI) but may have species-specific limitations.

摘要

新的血培养仪器和培养基配方提高了血培养阳性的阳性时间 (TTP)。关于当代血培养系统中儿科血培养瓶的必要性的数据很少。我们比较了三种商业血培养系统的性能,评估了系统间标准和儿科血培养培养基中血量对系统的影响。使用 FAN Plus、Redox 和 Bactec Plus 培养基分别评估了 Virtuo、VersaTrek 和 Bactec FX 仪器上用浓缩红细胞 (PRBC) 和三种革兰氏阳性菌、四种革兰氏阴性菌和一种厌氧菌(终浓度范围为 0.5 至 19 CFU/ml 血液)模拟的血培养。对于每种培养基/仪器/生物体组合,在三重复条件下评估了 1、3、5 和 10ml 血量。检测率不受血量影响。检测率不同的需氧生物体为金氏金菌、流感嗜血杆菌和脑膜炎奈瑟菌。脆弱拟杆菌分别在 Virtuo、VersaTrek 和 Bactec 厌氧瓶中检测到 83%、100%和 100%。与 VersaTrek(-2.3 小时)和 Bactec(-4.9 小时)相比,Virtuo 上检测到的需氧生物体的标准培养基的平均 TTP 降低。与标准培养基相比,Virtuo 的检测率和 TTP 保持不变,而儿科培养基的 TTP 降低了,在 Bactec 上测试的 8 种生物体中的 2 种和在 VersaTrek 上测试的 8 种生物体中的 7 种,这表明在采集低血量(<5ml)时,儿科培养基对 VersaTrek 或 Bactec 可能具有潜在的益处。这些结果表明,与 VersaTrek 和 Bactec 相比,许多与血流感染(BSI)相关的微生物在 Virtuo 上的 TTP 降低,但可能存在物种特异性限制。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Microorganism Detection and Time to Positivity in Pediatric and Standard Media from Three Major Commercial Continuously Monitored Blood Culture Systems.三种主要商业连续监测血培养系统中儿科与标准培养基的微生物检测和阳性时间比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0042921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00429-21.
2
Evaluation of BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®, BACT/ALERT 3D®, and BACTEC™ FX Automated Blood Culture Systems for Detection of Microbial Pathogens Using Simulated Human Blood Samples.使用模拟人血样本评估BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®、BACT/ALERT 3D®和BACTEC™ FX全自动血培养系统检测微生物病原体的性能
Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 19;10:221. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00221. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital.三种血培养系统在中国一家三甲医院的性能比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019 Aug 7;9:285. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00285. eCollection 2019.
4
Comparison of Growth Performance of the BacT/ALERT VIRTUO and BACTEC FX Blood Culture Systems Under Simulated Bloodstream Infection Conditions.在模拟血流感染条件下BacT/ALERT VIRTUO和BACTEC FX血培养系统的生长性能比较
Clin Lab. 2017 Jan 1;63(1):39-46. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160502.
5
Impact of Automated Blood Culture Systems on the Management of Bloodstream Infections: Results from a Crossover Diagnostic Clinical Trial.自动化血培养系统对血流感染管理的影响:一项交叉诊断临床试验的结果。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0143622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01436-22. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
6
Time-to-detection of bacteria and yeast with the BACTEC FX versus BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture systems.使用BACTEC FX血培养系统与BacT/Alert Virtuo血培养系统检测细菌和酵母菌的时间。
Ann Saudi Med. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):194-199. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.194.
7
Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.VersaTREK和BacT/ALERT 3D血培养系统在微生物检测、阳性时间及活菌计数的时间依赖性变化方面的比较
Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi. 2022 Dec 26;32(1):23-35.
8
Controlled clinical laboratory comparison of two supplemented aerobic and anaerobic media used in automated blood culture systems to detect bloodstream infections.用于自动血培养系统检测血流感染的两种补充需氧和厌氧培养基的对照临床实验室比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Mar;36(3):657-61. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.3.657-661.1998.
9
Comparison of BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F medium to VersaTREK Redox 1 blood culture medium for detection of Candida spp. in seeded blood culture specimens containing therapeutic levels of antifungal agents.BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F 培养基与 VersaTREK Redox 1 血液培养基于含治疗剂量抗真菌药物的血培养标本中检测念珠菌属的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Apr;49(4):1524-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02260-10. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
10
A comparative evaluation of BACT/ALERT FA PLUS and FN PLUS blood culture bottles and BD BACTEC Plus Aerobic and Anaerobic blood culture bottles for antimicrobial neutralization.BACT/ALERT FA PLUS 和 FN PLUS 血培养瓶与 BD BACTEC Plus 需氧和厌氧血培养瓶对抗菌药物中和作用的比较评估。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;38(12):2229-2233. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03663-3. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of packed red blood cells versus fresh whole human blood on the growth of nutritionally variant streptococci and group during verification of the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO blood culture system.在BACT/ALERT VIRTUO血培养系统验证期间,浓缩红细胞与新鲜全血对营养变异链球菌生长及分组的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 May 14;63(5):e0198724. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01987-24. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Comparing NGS-Based identification of bloodstream infections to traditional culture methods for enhanced ICU care: a comprehensive study.基于 NGS 的血流感染鉴定与传统培养方法在 ICU 治疗中的比较:一项全面研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Sep 12;14:1454549. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1454549. eCollection 2024.
3
Optimization and Testing of a Commercial Viability PCR Protocol to Detect in Whole Blood.用于检测全血中[具体内容缺失]的商业可行性聚合酶链反应(PCR)方案的优化与测试
Microorganisms. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):765. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12040765.
4
Direct-from-Blood Detection of Pathogens: a Review of Technology and Challenges.直接从血液中检测病原体:技术与挑战综述。
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Jul 20;61(7):e0023121. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00231-21. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Subculturing and Gram staining of blood cultures flagged negative by the BACTEC™ FX system: Optimizing the workflow for detection of in clinical specimens.对BACTEC™ FX系统标记为阴性的血培养物进行传代培养和革兰氏染色:优化临床标本检测工作流程。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1113817. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1113817. eCollection 2023.
6
Impact of Implementation of BacTAlert Virtuo on Blood Culture Time to Positivity in Sepsis Patients.BacTAlert Virtuo系统的实施对脓毒症患者血培养阳性时间的影响
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 7;11(2):e0500322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05003-22.
7
Rapid and precise identification of bloodstream infections using a pre-treatment protocol combined with high-throughput multiplex genetic detection system.采用预处理方案联合高通量多重基因检测系统快速准确鉴定血流感染。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07793-6.
8
Time to Positivity Facilitates an Early Differential Diagnosis of from Other species.达到阳性的时间有助于从其他物种中早期鉴别诊断[具体疾病名称缺失]。
Infect Drug Resist. 2022 Oct 10;15:5879-5886. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S383846. eCollection 2022.
9
Impact of Automated Blood Culture Systems on the Management of Bloodstream Infections: Results from a Crossover Diagnostic Clinical Trial.自动化血培养系统对血流感染管理的影响:一项交叉诊断临床试验的结果。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0143622. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01436-22. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
10
Routine Use of Anaerobic Blood Culture Bottles for Specimens Collected from Adults and Children Enhances Microorganism Recovery and Improves Time to Positivity.常规使用厌氧血培养瓶对成人和儿童采集的标本进行培养可提高微生物回收率并缩短阳性时间。
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Sep 21;60(9):e0050022. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00500-22. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Optimal Blood Culture Incubation Time To Maximize Clinically Relevant Results from a Contemporary Blood Culture Instrument and Media System.评估最佳血培养孵育时间,以从当代血培养仪器和介质系统中获得最具临床相关性的结果。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;59(3). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02459-20.
2
Relevance of anaerobic bacteremia in adult patients: A never-ending story?成年患者厌氧菌血症的相关性:一个永无止境的故事?
Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp). 2020 Jun 5;10(2):64-75. doi: 10.1556/1886.2020.00009.
3
Bacteremia and Blood Culture Utilization during COVID-19 Surge in New York City.纽约市新冠疫情高峰期的菌血症与血培养利用情况
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00875-20.
4
Best Practices for Detection of Bloodstream Infection.血流感染检测的最佳实践
J Appl Lab Med. 2019 Jan;3(4):740-742. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2018.026260.
5
Detailed Analysis of the Characteristics of Sample Volume in Blood Culture Bottles.血培养瓶样本量特征的详细分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jul 26;57(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00268-19. Print 2019 Aug.
6
Evaluation of BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®, BACT/ALERT 3D®, and BACTEC™ FX Automated Blood Culture Systems for Detection of Microbial Pathogens Using Simulated Human Blood Samples.使用模拟人血样本评估BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®、BACT/ALERT 3D®和BACTEC™ FX全自动血培养系统检测微生物病原体的性能
Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 19;10:221. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00221. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparison of Clinical Performance Between BacT/Alert Virtuo and BacT/Alert 3D Blood Culture Systems.BacT/Alert Virtuo 与 BacT/Alert 3D 血培养系统临床性能比较。
Ann Lab Med. 2019 May;39(3):278-283. doi: 10.3343/alm.2019.39.3.278.
8
Time-to-detection of bacteria and yeast with the BACTEC FX versus BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture systems.使用BACTEC FX血培养系统与BacT/Alert Virtuo血培养系统检测细菌和酵母菌的时间。
Ann Saudi Med. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):194-199. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2018.194.
9
Performance of the BacT/Alert Virtuo Microbial Detection System for the culture of sterile body fluids: prospective multicentre study.BacT/Alert Virtuo 微生物检测系统对无菌体液培养的性能:前瞻性多中心研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Sep;24(9):992-996. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.011. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Comparison of 'time to detection' values between BacT/ALERT VIRTUO and BacT/ALERT 3D instruments for clinical blood culture samples.BacT/ALERT VIRTUO仪器与BacT/ALERT 3D仪器对临床血培养样本的“检测时间”值比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;62:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 15.