Suppr超能文献

了解 ABC 知识:两种糖尿病教育方法的比较效果研究。

Knowing the ABCs: a comparative effectiveness study of two methods of diabetes education.

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Dec;85(3):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test an active-learning, empowerment approach to teaching patients about the "diabetes ABCs" (hemoglobin A(1)C, systolic blood pressure, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol).

METHODS

84 (97%) diabetic patients who participated in a randomized effectiveness trial of two clinic-based group educational methods and completed a post-intervention assessment. The empowerment arm participated in a group session that incorporated two educational innovations (a conceptual metaphor to foster understanding, and team-based learning methods to foster active learning). The traditional diabetes education arm received a didactic group session focused on self-management and educational materials about the diabetes ABCs. Participants in both arms received individual review of their current ABC values.

RESULTS

A questionnaire evaluated knowledge, understanding, and recall of the diabetes ABCs was administered three months after enrollment in the study. At three months, participants in the empowerment group demonstrated greater understanding of the diabetes ABCs (P<0.0001), greater knowledge of their own values (P<0.0001), and greater knowledge of guideline-derived target goals for the ABCs compared with participants in the traditional arm (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

An active-learning, empowerment-based approach applied to diabetes education can lead to greater understanding and knowledge retention.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

An empowerment approach to education can facilitate informed, activated patients and increase performance of self-management behaviors.

摘要

目的

测试一种以主动学习、赋权为基础的方法,向患者传授关于“糖尿病 ABCs”(糖化血红蛋白 A1C、收缩压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇)的知识。

方法

84 名(97%)参与了两种基于诊所的团体教育方法的随机有效性试验并完成了干预后评估的糖尿病患者。赋权组参加了一个小组会议,其中纳入了两项教育创新(一个概念隐喻以促进理解,以及团队学习方法以促进主动学习)。传统的糖尿病教育组接受了以自我管理为重点的小组课程和关于糖尿病 ABCs 的教育材料。两组参与者都收到了对其当前 ABC 值的个人审查。

结果

在研究入组三个月后,对一份评估糖尿病 ABCs 的知识、理解和记忆的问卷进行了评估。在三个月时,赋权组的参与者对糖尿病 ABCs 的理解程度更高(P<0.0001),对自己的数值的了解程度更高(P<0.0001),并且对指南衍生的 ABC 目标值的了解程度也高于传统组(P<0.0001)。

结论

应用于糖尿病教育的主动学习、赋权方法可以导致更好的理解和知识保留。

实践意义

教育的赋权方法可以促进知情、活跃的患者,并增加自我管理行为的表现。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions.患者赋权:误解与误区。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jun;79(3):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.025. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
5
The neglected purpose of comparative-effectiveness research.比较效果研究被忽视的目的。
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1929-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0902195.
7
National standards for diabetes self-management education.糖尿病自我管理教育国家标准。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S87-94. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S087.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验