Division of Pulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011 Jan 7;6:35-45. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S14680.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Developments in the understanding of COPD have led to standard guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and spirometry assessments, which have in turn influenced trial designs and inclusion criteria. Substantial clinical evidence has been gained from clinical trials and supports a positive approach to COPD management. However, there appear to be changing trends in recent trials. Large bronchodilator studies have reported lower improvements in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) values versus placebo than were observed in earlier studies, while the rate of FEV(1) decline seems to be lower in more recent trials. In addition, recent evidence has called into question the usefulness of bronchodilator reversibility testing as a trial inclusion criterion. Baseline patient populations and use of concomitant medications have also changed over recent years due to increased treatment options. The impact of these many variables on clinical trial results is explored, with a particular focus on changes in inclusion criteria and patient baseline demographics.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。对 COPD 的认识的发展导致了诊断、治疗和肺量计评估的标准指南,这反过来又影响了试验设计和纳入标准。大量的临床证据来自临床试验,并支持对 COPD 管理采取积极的方法。然而,最近的试验似乎出现了变化趋势。大型支气管扩张剂研究报告的 trough 用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV1)值相对于安慰剂的改善低于早期研究观察到的水平,而在最近的试验中 FEV1 下降的速度似乎更低。此外,最近的证据质疑支气管扩张剂可逆性测试作为试验纳入标准的有用性。由于治疗选择的增加,近年来,基线患者人群和同时使用的药物也发生了变化。本文探讨了这些许多变量对临床试验结果的影响,特别关注纳入标准和患者基线人口统计学的变化。