Suppr超能文献

氧化铜络合物结合能的量子化学评估。

Quantum chemical assessment of the binding energy of CuO+.

机构信息

Institut für Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Chem Phys. 2011 Feb 14;134(6):064304. doi: 10.1063/1.3537797.

Abstract

We present a detailed theoretical investigation on the dissociation energy of CuO(+), carried out by means of coupled cluster theory, the multireference averaged coupled pair functional (MR-ACPF) approach, diffusion quantum Monte Carlo (DMC), and density functional theory (DFT). At the respective extrapolated basis set limits, most post-Hartree-Fock approaches agree within a narrow error margin on a D(e) value of 26.0 kcal mol(-1) [coupled-cluster singles and doubles level augmented by perturbative triples corrections, CCSD(T)], 25.8 kcal mol(-1) (CCSDTQ via the high accuracy extrapolated ab initio thermochemistry protocol), and 25.6 kcal mol(-1) (DMC), which is encouraging in view of the disaccording data published thus far. The configuration-interaction based MR-ACPF expansion, which includes single and double excitations only, gives a slightly lower value of 24.1 kcal mol(-1), indicating that large basis sets and triple excitation patterns are necessary ingredients for a quantitative assessment. Our best estimate for D(0) at the CCSD(T) level is 25.3 kcal mol(-1), which is somewhat lower than the latest experimental value (D(0) = 31.1 ± 2.8 kcal mol(-1)[semicolon] reported by the Armentrout group) [Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 182/183, 99 (1999)]. These highly correlated methods are, however, computationally very demanding, and the results are therefore supplemented with those of more affordable DFT calculations. If used in combination with moderately-sized basis sets, the M05 and M06 hybrid functionals turn out to be promising candidates for studies on much larger systems containing a CuO core.

摘要

我们提出了一个关于 CuO(+)离解能的详细理论研究,通过使用耦合簇理论、多参考平均耦合对泛函(MR-ACPF)方法、扩散量子蒙特卡罗(DMC)和密度泛函理论(DFT)进行。在各自外推基组极限下,大多数后哈特利-福克方法在一个狭窄的误差范围内一致,得到的 D(e)值为 26.0 kcal mol(-1)[耦合簇单双激发水平加上微扰三激发修正,CCSD(T)]、25.8 kcal mol(-1)[通过高精度外推从头算热化学协议的 CCSD(TQ)]和 25.6 kcal mol(-1)[DMC],这在考虑到迄今为止发表的不一致数据时是令人鼓舞的。基于组态相互作用的 MR-ACPF 扩展,仅包括单激发和双激发,给出了稍低的值 24.1 kcal mol(-1),表明大基组和三激发模式是定量评估的必要条件。我们在 CCSD(T)水平下对 D(0)的最佳估计值为 25.3 kcal mol(-1),略低于最近的实验值(D(0) = 31.1 ± 2.8 kcal mol(-1)[分号]由 Armentrout 小组报告[Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 182/183, 99 (1999)])。这些高度相关的方法计算量非常大,因此结果补充了更经济的 DFT 计算结果。如果与中等大小的基组结合使用,M05 和 M06 杂化泛函对于研究包含CuO核心的更大系统是很有前途的候选者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验