Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 6035 Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15101, USA.
Phys Ther. 2011 Apr;91(4):452-69. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100188. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
Impairment-based exercise programs have yielded only small to moderate benefits in reducing pain and improving function in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). It has previously been proposed that adding agility and perturbation training to exercise programs for people with knee OA may improve treatment effects for pain and function.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of adding agility and perturbation techniques to standard exercise therapy compared with the standard exercise program alone for people with knee OA.
This was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
The study was conducted in the outpatient physical therapy clinic of a large, university-based health center.
One hundred eighty-three people with knee OA (122 women, 61 men) participated.
Participants were randomly assigned to either a group that received agility and perturbation training with standard exercise therapy or a group that received only the standard exercise program.
The outcome measures were self-reported knee pain and function, self-reported knee instability, a performance-based measure of function, and global rating of change.
Although both groups exhibited improvement in self-reported function and in the global rating of change at the 2-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up periods, there were no differences between groups on these outcomes. There was no reduction in knee pain or improvement in performance-based function in either group.
It is possible that more-intense application of the interventions or application of the interventions to participants with knee OA who were at greater risk for falling may have yielded additive effects of the agility and perturbation training approach.
Both intervention groups exhibited improvement in self-reported function and the global rating of change. Our results, however, did not support an additive effect of agility and perturbation training with standard exercise therapy in our sample of individuals with knee OA. Further study is needed to determine whether there are subgroups of individuals who might achieve an added benefit with this approach.
基于损伤的运动方案在减轻膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的疼痛和改善功能方面仅产生了较小到中等的益处。先前曾提出,在膝关节 OA 患者的运动方案中增加敏捷性和扰动训练可能会改善疼痛和功能的治疗效果。
本研究旨在比较膝关节 OA 患者接受敏捷性和扰动技术与仅接受标准运动疗法的治疗效果。
这是一项单盲随机对照试验。
研究在一所大型大学健康中心的门诊物理治疗诊所进行。
183 名膝关节 OA 患者(122 名女性,61 名男性)参与了研究。
参与者被随机分配到接受敏捷性和扰动训练与标准运动疗法的组或仅接受标准运动方案的组。
结局指标是自我报告的膝关节疼痛和功能、自我报告的膝关节不稳定性、功能的基于表现的测量和总体变化的评价。
尽管两组在 2、6 和 12 个月的随访期间在自我报告的功能和总体变化的评价方面均有改善,但两组之间在这些结果上没有差异。两组的膝关节疼痛均未减轻,基于表现的功能也未改善。
更强烈地应用干预措施或将干预措施应用于膝关节 OA 患者中跌倒风险较高的患者,可能会产生敏捷性和扰动训练方法的附加效果。
两组干预组在自我报告的功能和总体变化的评价方面均有改善。然而,我们的结果并不支持在膝关节 OA 患者中,敏捷性和扰动训练与标准运动疗法联合应用的附加效果。需要进一步的研究来确定是否有特定的亚组患者可能会从这种方法中获得额外的益处。