Suppr超能文献

用可吸收和不可吸收膜治疗下颌第三磨牙阻生后牙槽骨内缺损。

Treatment of intrabony defects after impacted mandibular third molar removal with bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Dental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2011 Oct;82(10):1404-13. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.100466. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mandibular second molar (M2) periodontal defects after third molar (M3) removal in high-risk patients are a clinical dilemma for clinicians. This study compares the healing of periodontal intrabony defects at distal surfaces of mandibular M2s using bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes.

METHODS

Eleven patients with bilateral probing depths (PDs) ≥6 mm distal to mandibular M2s and intrabony defects ≥3 mm, related to the total impaction of M3s, were treated with M3 extraction and covering of the surgical bone defect with a bioabsorbable collagen barrier on one side and a non-resorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) barrier contralaterally. The PD, clinical attachment level (CAL), M2 mobility, and furcation class probing were evaluated preoperatively and 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively. Intraoral periapical radiographs were taken immediately preoperatively and 3 and 9 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Both treatment modalities were successful. At 9 months, the mean PD reduction was 5.2 ± 3.9 mm for bioabsorbable sites and 5.5 ± 3.0 mm for non-resorbable sites; the CAL gain was 5.9 ± 3.3 mm and 5.5 ± 3.4 mm, respectively. The outcome difference between the two sites for PD and CAL did not differ statistically (P >0.05) at any assessment time.

CONCLUSION

Bioabsorbable collagen membranes in guided tissue regeneration treatment of intrabony defects distal to the mandibular M2 obtained the same marked PD reductions and CAL gains as non-resorbable ePTFE membranes after M3 extraction.

摘要

背景

在高危患者中,第三磨牙(M3)拔除后下颌第二磨牙(M2)的牙周缺损是临床医生面临的一个难题。本研究比较了使用可吸收和不可吸收膜治疗下颌 M2 远中面牙周骨内缺损的愈合情况。

方法

11 例双侧下颌 M2 远中探诊深度(PD)≥6mm,且存在骨内缺损≥3mm的患者,M3 均完全埋伏阻生,采用 M3 拔除术,一侧用可吸收胶原屏障覆盖手术骨缺损,另一侧用不可吸收的膨化聚四氟乙烯(ePTFE)屏障覆盖。在术前、术后 3、6 和 9 个月评估 PD、临床附着水平(CAL)、M2 动度和分叉区探诊,并在术前、术后 3 和 9 个月拍摄口腔根尖片。

结果

两种治疗方法均成功。9 个月时,可吸收部位的平均 PD 减少量为 5.2±3.9mm,不可吸收部位为 5.5±3.0mm;CAL 增加量分别为 5.9±3.3mm 和 5.5±3.4mm。两种部位在 PD 和 CAL 方面的结果差异在任何评估时间均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在 M3 拔除后,引导组织再生治疗下颌 M2 远中面骨内缺损时,可吸收胶原膜可获得与不可吸收 ePTFE 膜相同的显著 PD 减少和 CAL 增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验