Suppr超能文献

牛和猪胶原蛋白膜生物相容性与生物降解性的体内比较评估

In Vivo Comparative Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Biodegradation of Bovine and Porcine Collagen Membranes.

作者信息

Neto Abdu Mansur Dacache, Sartoretto Suelen Cristina, Duarte Isabelle Martins, Resende Rodrigo Figueiredo de Brito, Neves Novellino Alves Adriana Terezinha, Mourão Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros, Calasans-Maia Jose, Montemezzi Pietro, Tristão Gilson Coutinho, Calasans-Maia Mônica Diuana

机构信息

Graduate Program, Dentistry School, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niteroi 24020-140, RJ, Brazil.

Oral Surgery Department, Dentistry School, Universidade Veiga de Almeida, Rio de Janeiro 20271-020, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Membranes (Basel). 2020 Dec 15;10(12):423. doi: 10.3390/membranes10120423.

Abstract

Mechanical barriers prevent the invasion of the surrounding soft tissues within the bone defects. This concept is known as Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR). The knowledge about the local tissue reaction and the time of degradation of absorbable membranes favors the correct clinical indication. This study aimed to evaluate the biocompatibility and biodegradation of a bovine collagen membrane (Lyostypt, São Gonçalo, Brazil) and compare it to a porcine collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) implanted in the subcutaneous tissue of mice, following ISO 10993-6:2016. Thirty Balb-C mice were randomly divided into three experimental groups, LT (Lyostypt), BG (Bio-Gide), and Sham (without implantation), and subdivided according to the experimental periods (7, 21, and 63 days). The BG was considered non-irritant at seven days and slight and moderate irritant at 21 and 63 days, respectively. The LT presented a small irritant reaction at seven days, a mild reaction after 21, and a reduction in the inflammatory response at 63 days. The biodegradation of the LT occurred more rapidly compared to the BG after 63 days. This study concluded that both membranes were considered biocompatible since their tissue reactions were compatible with the physiological inflammatory process; however, the Bio-Gide was less degraded during the experimental periods, favoring the guided bone regeneration process.

摘要

机械屏障可防止骨缺损周围的软组织侵入。这一概念被称为引导性骨再生(GBR)。关于局部组织反应和可吸收膜降解时间的知识有助于正确的临床应用。本研究旨在评估一种牛胶原膜(Lyostypt,巴西圣贡萨洛)的生物相容性和生物降解性,并按照ISO 10993-6:2016标准,将其与植入小鼠皮下组织的猪胶原膜(Bio-Gide)进行比较。30只Balb-C小鼠被随机分为三个实验组,LT(Lyostypt)组、BG(Bio-Gide)组和假手术组(未植入),并根据实验周期(7天、21天和63天)进一步细分。BG在7天时被认为无刺激性,在21天和63天时分别为轻度和中度刺激性。LT在7天时出现轻微的刺激反应,21天后为轻度反应,63天时炎症反应减轻。63天后,LT的生物降解比BG更快。本研究得出结论,由于两种膜的组织反应与生理性炎症过程相符,因此均被认为具有生物相容性;然而,在实验期间,Bio-Gide的降解程度较小,有利于引导性骨再生过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2dd/7765348/5ae5fd700b6f/membranes-10-00423-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验