• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进一步验证盆腔底部窘迫量表(PFDI)和盆腔底部影响问卷(PFIQ)的简短版本。

Further validation of the short form versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ).

机构信息

Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Apr;30(4):541-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20934. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1002/nau.20934
PMID:21344495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3759146/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate validity and responsiveness of PFDI and PFIQ short forms across four multi-center studies and develop conversion formulas between short and long versions.

METHODS

1,006 participants in four prospective studies of pelvic floor disorders completed long versions of the PFDI, PFIQ, and SF-36 (or SF-12) at baseline and 3 and 12 months after treatment. Responses were used to calculate scores for the short versions. We calculated correlations between scale versions using Pearson's correlation coefficient and compared their relative responsiveness using the standardized response mean.

RESULTS

PFDI and PFIQ short form scale scores demonstrated excellent correlations with long versions and similar responsiveness. Responsiveness was good to excellent for PFDI-20 urinary and prolapse scales, moderate for PFDI-20 colorectal scale and each of the PFIQ-7 scales, and poor for SF-36 (or SF-12) summary scores. Conversion formulas demonstrated excellent goodness of fit.

CONCLUSIONS

The long and short forms of the PFDI and PFIQ correlate well and have similar overall responsiveness in participants from four different prospective multicenter studies consisting of diverse patient populations with a broad range of pelvic floor disorders. The short forms provide a reliable and valid alternative in situations where reduced response burden is desired.

摘要

目的

评估 PFDI 和 PFIQ 短式问卷在四项多中心研究中的有效性和反应度,并建立短式与长式之间的转换公式。

方法

在四项盆腔器官脱垂疾病的前瞻性研究中,1006 名参与者在基线和治疗后 3 个月和 12 个月时完成了 PFDI、PFIQ 和 SF-36(或 SF-12)的长式问卷。根据这些应答,计算出短式问卷的分数。我们使用 Pearson 相关系数计算了量表版本之间的相关性,并使用标准化反应均数比较了它们的相对反应度。

结果

PFDI 和 PFIQ 短式问卷的量表分数与长式问卷有极好的相关性,且反应度相似。PFDI-20 尿失禁和脱垂量表的反应度为良好至极好,PFDI-20 结直肠量表和 PFIQ-7 各量表的反应度为中等,SF-36(或 SF-12)总分的反应度为差。转换公式的拟合优度极好。

结论

在四项不同的前瞻性多中心研究中,来自不同患者人群、患有多种不同盆腔器官脱垂疾病的参与者中,PFDI 和 PFIQ 的长式和短式问卷相关性良好,总体反应度相似。在需要减少应答负担的情况下,短式问卷提供了一种可靠有效的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Further validation of the short form versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ).进一步验证盆腔底部窘迫量表(PFDI)和盆腔底部影响问卷(PFIQ)的简短版本。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Apr;30(4):541-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20934. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
2
Responsiveness of the Spanish Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaires Short Forms (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7) in women with pelvic floor disorders.西班牙盆底困扰量表和盆底影响问卷简表(PFDI-20和PFIQ-7)在盆底功能障碍女性中的反应性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jul;190:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
3
Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).针对盆底功能障碍女性的两种特定疾病生活质量问卷的简短形式(PFDI - 20和PFIQ - 7)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
4
Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.盆底功能障碍性疾病量表(PFDI)和盆底功能影响问卷(PFIQ)在接受阴道手术和子宫托治疗盆腔器官脱垂的女性中的反应性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.076.
5
Reliability and validity of the Tigrigna version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7).提格雷尼亚语版盆底功能障碍性疾病量表简表20(PFDI - 20)和盆底功能影响问卷7(PFIQ - 7)的信度和效度。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jan;30(1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3583-9. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 in Danish women with pelvic organ prolapse.验证盆腔器官脱垂丹麦女性的盆腔窘迫量表 20 项和盆腔器官脱垂影响问卷 7。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Sep;92(9):1041-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12189. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
7
Translation, reliability, and validity of Amharic versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7).阿姆哈拉语版盆腔窘迫量表(PFDI-20)和盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁影响问卷(PFIQ-7)的翻译、信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0270434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270434. eCollection 2022.
8
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Greek short forms of two condition-specific quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders: PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7.针对盆底功能障碍女性的两份特定疾病生活质量问卷希腊语简版(PFDI - 20和PFIQ - 7)的翻译及心理测量学评估。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Dec;24(12):2131-44. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2144-5. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
9
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form (PFIQ-7) Spanish versions.盆腔窘迫量表简表(PFDI-20)和盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁影响问卷简表(PFIQ-7)西班牙版本的文化调适和验证。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):281-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
10
Validation of the short forms of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) in Finnish.盆底功能障碍性疾病问卷简表(PFDI - 20)、盆底功能影响问卷简表(PFIQ - 7)及盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷简表(PISQ - 12)芬兰语版本的效度验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 2;15(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0648-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic lateral suspension, sacrocolpopexy, and transvaginal mesh for advanced apical prolapse: A retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜侧方悬吊术、骶棘韧带固定术及经阴道网片治疗重度顶端脱垂的比较结果:一项回顾性队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 12;20(9):e0332526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332526. eCollection 2025.
2
Self-identification of Pelvic Floor Disorder Symptoms Among Latina Women: The Roles of Knowledge, Attitude, Behaviors, Beliefs, and Psychosocial Factors.拉丁裔女性盆底功能障碍症状的自我识别:知识、态度、行为、信念和社会心理因素的作用
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02421-w.
3
Miles and Maternity: A Survey of Long-Duration Exercise During Pregnancy.迈尔斯与孕产:孕期长期运动调查
Sports Med. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02223-4.
4
Long-Term Outcomes Following Vaginal versus Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.阴道与腹腔镜子宫骶韧带悬吊术后的长期结局
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06132-y.
5
Vaginal Erbium Laser Versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomised Controlled Trial.阴道铒激光与盆底肌肉训练治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06091-4.
6
The Pelvic Floor Disorders Network: Evolution Over Two Decades of Female Pelvic Floor Research.盆底功能障碍网络:女性盆底研究二十年的发展历程
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Oct 1;30(10):854-869. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001571.
7
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review Using the COnsensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) Checklist.盆腔器官脱垂的患者报告结局指标:使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价
BJOG. 2025 Jan;132(2):105-117. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17971. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
8
A Study on Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Assigned Female at Birth Patients Diagnosed with Gender Dysphoria Undergoing Vaginectomy.一项关于诊断为性别焦虑症且正在接受阴道切除术的出生时被指定为女性的患者盆底功能障碍症状的研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e5950. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005950. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of pessary self-management versus clinic-based care for pelvic organ prolapse in women: the TOPSY RCT with process evaluation.经阴道子宫托自我管理与基于诊所的护理治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂的临床和成本效益:TOPSY RCT 及其过程评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 May;28(23):1-121. doi: 10.3310/NWTB5403.
10
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction among Reproductive-Age Women in Israel: Prevalence and Attitudes-A Cross-Sectional Study.以色列育龄妇女盆底功能障碍:患病率与态度——一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 2;12(3):390. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030390.

本文引用的文献

1
Pelvic support, pelvic symptoms, and patient satisfaction after colpocleisis.阴道封闭术后的盆腔支持、盆腔症状及患者满意度
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Dec;19(12):1603-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0696-6. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
2
Behavioral therapy to enable women with urge incontinence to discontinue drug treatment: a randomized trial.行为疗法促使急迫性尿失禁女性停止药物治疗:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):161-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00005.
3
Non-surgical management of stress urinary incontinence: ambulatory treatments for leakage associated with stress (ATLAS) trial.压力性尿失禁的非手术治疗:压力性尿失禁相关漏尿的门诊治疗(ATLAS)试验
Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):92-101. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075237.
4
Quality of life after surgery for genital prolapse in elderly women: obliterative and reconstructive surgery.老年女性生殖器脱垂手术后的生活质量:闭塞性手术与重建性手术
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jul;18(7):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0240-5. Epub 2006 Nov 17.
5
Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.盆底功能障碍性疾病量表(PFDI)和盆底功能影响问卷(PFIQ)在接受阴道手术和子宫托治疗盆腔器官脱垂的女性中的反应性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.076.
6
Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence.腹骶阴道固定术联合Burch阴道悬吊术以减轻压力性尿失禁。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 13;354(15):1557-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054208.
7
Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).针对盆底功能障碍女性的两种特定疾病生活质量问卷的简短形式(PFDI - 20和PFIQ - 7)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.
8
Reliability of health-related quality-of-life measures 1 year after surgical procedures for pelvic floor disorders.盆底功能障碍手术后1年健康相关生活质量测量的可靠性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;192(3):780-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.603.
9
Can disease specific measures for systemic lupus erythematosus predict patients health related quality of life?系统性红斑狼疮的疾病特异性指标能否预测患者的健康相关生活质量?
Lupus. 2004;13(12):924-6. doi: 10.1191/0961203304lu2034oa.
10
Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence.改良版曼彻斯特健康问卷在评估大便失禁患者中的效度和信度。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):323-31; discussion 331-4. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0899-y.