Suppr超能文献

在急诊科就诊的脓毒症患者的死亡率低于直接入院的患者。

Lower mortality in sepsis patients admitted through the ED vs direct admission.

机构信息

Northwestern University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 602611, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;30(3):432-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Early aggressive resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis decreases mortality but requires extensive time and resources. This study analyzes if patients with sepsis admitted through the emergency department (ED) have lower inpatient mortality than do patients admitted directly to the hospital.

PROCEDURES

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of sepsis in institutions with an annual minimum of 25 ED and 25 direct admissions for sepsis, using data from the 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Analyses were controlled for patient and hospital characteristics and examined the likelihood of either early (2-day postadmission) or overall inpatient mortality.

FINDINGS

Of 98,896 hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of sepsis, from 290 hospitals, 80,301 were admitted through the ED and 18,595 directly to the hospital. Overall sepsis inpatient mortality was 17.1% for ED admissions and 19.7% for direct admissions (P<.001). Overall early sepsis mortality was 6.9%: 6.8% for ED admissions and 7.4% for direct admissions (P=.005). Emergency department patients had a greater proportion of comorbid conditions, were more likely to have Medicaid or be uninsured (12.5% vs 8.4%; P<.001), and were more likely to be admitted to urban, large bed-size, or teaching hospitals (P<.001). The risk-adjusted odds ratio for overall mortality for ED admissions was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.87) and 0.92 for early mortality (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.98), as compared with direct admissions to the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Admission for sepsis through the ED was associated with lower early and overall inpatient mortality in this large national sample.

摘要

目的

严重脓毒症患者的早期积极复苏可降低死亡率,但需要大量的时间和资源。本研究分析了通过急诊(ED)入院的脓毒症患者与直接入院的患者相比,住院死亡率是否更低。

方法

我们对 2008 年全国住院患者样本中,年 ED 至少有 25 例和直接因脓毒症入院 25 例的机构中,主要诊断为脓毒症的住院患者进行了一项横断面分析。分析中控制了患者和医院的特征,并检查了早期(入院后 2 天)或总体住院死亡率的可能性。

结果

在来自 290 家医院的 98896 例主要诊断为脓毒症的住院患者中,有 80301 例通过 ED 入院,18595 例直接入院。ED 入院的总体脓毒症住院死亡率为 17.1%,直接入院的为 19.7%(P<.001)。总体早期脓毒症死亡率为 6.9%:ED 入院为 6.8%,直接入院为 7.4%(P=.005)。ED 患者合并症的比例更高,更有可能拥有医疗补助或没有保险(12.5%比 8.4%;P<.001),更有可能被收入城市、大型床位或教学医院(P<.001)。与直接入院相比,ED 入院的整体死亡率风险调整比值比为 0.83(95%置信区间,0.80-0.87),早期死亡率为 0.92(95%置信区间,0.86-0.98)。

结论

在这个大型全国样本中,通过 ED 入院的脓毒症患者与直接入院相比,早期和总体住院死亡率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验