Johnson Douglas C, Polusny Melissa A, Erbes Christopher R, King Daniel, King Lynda, Litz Brett T, Schnurr Paula P, Friedman Matthew, Pietrzak Robert H, Southwick Steven M
Warfighter Performance, Naval Health Research Center, 140 Sylvester Road Bldg. 328, San Diego, CA 92106, USA.
Mil Med. 2011 Feb;176(2):161-9. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-10-00258.
This report describes the development and initial validation of the Response to Stressful Experiences Scale (RSES), a measure of individual differences in cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to stressful life events. We validated this instrument with active-duty and reserve components of military and veterans samples (N = 1,014). The resulting 22-item scale demonstrated sound internal consistency (alpha = 0.91-0.93) and good test-retest reliability (r = 0.87). Factor analysis suggested 5 protective factors: (a) meaning-making and restoration, (b) active coping, (c) cognitive flexibility, (d) spirituality, and (e) self-efficacy. Associations with other measures supported convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. In separate military samples, the RSES accounted for unique variance in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms above and beyond existing scales measuring resilience-related constructs, thereby demonstrating incremental validity. The RSES provides a brief, reliable, and valid measure of individual differences in cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to life's most stressful events.
本报告描述了应激经历反应量表(RSES)的开发及初步验证过程,该量表用于衡量个体在面对应激性生活事件时认知、情绪和行为反应的个体差异。我们在现役军人、后备役军人以及退伍军人样本(N = 1,014)中对该工具进行了验证。最终形成的22项量表显示出良好的内部一致性(α = 0.91 - 0.93)和良好的重测信度(r = 0.87)。因子分析表明存在5个保护因素:(a)意义建构与恢复,(b)积极应对,(c)认知灵活性,(d)精神性,以及(e)自我效能感。与其他测量方法的关联支持了其聚合效度、区分效度和同时效度。在不同的军人样本中,RSES在测量与复原力相关构念的现有量表之外,还解释了创伤后应激障碍症状中的独特方差,从而证明了其递增效度。RSES为个体在面对生活中最具压力事件时的认知、情绪和行为反应的个体差异提供了一种简短、可靠且有效的测量方法。