Cooper Alannah L, Roberts Georgia, Hegney Desley G, Brown Janie A
St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Nursing, College of Health & Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb 7. doi: 10.1111/jan.16769.
To identify and critically appraise instruments that have been used to measure nurse resilience.
A scoping review.
Comprehensive literature searches were conducted using four electronic databases CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Emcare from the year 2012 to December 2024.
The titles, then abstracts, of retrieved articles were screened by the authors against inclusion and exclusion criteria, then full-text screening was performed using Rayyan. Data about the study characteristics and the instruments used to measure nurse resilience were extracted. Copies of the instruments used to measure resilience were obtained and appraised.
Of the n = 4694 publications identified in the initial search n = 386 were included in the scoping review. Studies originated in n = 45 countries, the majority were conducted in China (n = 119) and the United States of America (n = 53). Across the n = 386 included studies, n = 15 instruments to measure resilience were identified and critically appraised. The scores for the instruments critically appraised ranged from 0 to 6 out of a total possible score of 11. Synthesis of results examined instrument development, instrument features and application of instruments.
Critical appraisal of the instruments used to measure nurse resilience revealed significant deficiencies. None of the instruments included all of the key attributes and factors that influence nurse resilience. There was a predominant focus on individual factors and little consideration of the influence of nursing work environments. Due to the shortcomings of the existing instruments, there are currently substantial limitations in our understanding of nurse resilience and how to measure it.
A profession-specific comprehensive measure of nurse resilience needs to be developed to better capture the attributes of nurse resilience.
This review highlights the limitations of instruments applied to measure nurse resilience.
The JBI scoping review framework.
No patient or public contribution.
识别并批判性评价用于测量护士复原力的工具。
范围综述。
使用四个电子数据库(CINAHL Ultimate、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Emcare)从2012年至2024年12月进行全面的文献检索。
作者根据纳入和排除标准对检索到的文章标题进行筛选,然后筛选摘要,接着使用Rayyan进行全文筛选。提取有关研究特征和用于测量护士复原力的工具的数据。获取并评价用于测量复原力的工具副本。
在初步检索中识别出的n = 4694篇出版物中,有n = 386篇纳入范围综述。研究来自n = 45个国家,大多数在中国(n = 119)和美利坚合众国(n = 53)进行。在n = 386项纳入研究中,识别并批判性评价了n = 15种测量复原力的工具。批判性评价的工具得分在总分为11分的情况下从0到6分不等。结果综合审查了工具开发、工具特征和工具应用。
对用于测量护士复原力的工具进行批判性评价发现存在重大缺陷。没有一种工具包含影响护士复原力的所有关键属性和因素。主要侧重于个体因素,很少考虑护理工作环境的影响。由于现有工具的缺点,目前我们对护士复原力及其测量方法的理解存在很大局限性。
需要开发一种针对特定专业的护士复原力综合测量方法,以更好地捕捉护士复原力的属性。
本综述突出了用于测量护士复原力的工具的局限性。
JBI范围综述框架。
无患者或公众贡献。