• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用多种模拟场景中的表现来评估支气管镜检查技能。

Using performance in multiple simulated scenarios to assess bronchoscopy skills.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Education, University of Copenhagen and Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. lkonge @ yahoo.dk

出版信息

Respiration. 2011;81(6):483-90. doi: 10.1159/000324452. Epub 2011 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1159/000324452
PMID:21372553
Abstract

BACKGROUND

International guidelines suggest that trainees should perform at least 100 flexible bronchoscopies in a supervised setting, but this number is not evidence based. An objective assessment method could provide educational feedback to trainees and help supervisors decide when basic competency is established. No former assessment instrument has been able to distinguish between trainees and experts.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to explore the validity and reliability of a new assessment procedure relating to testing operators across multiple tasks with increasing difficulty using a standardized scoring form.

METHODS

The test was administered on a virtual reality bronchoscopy simulator to a total of 42 test subjects (14 senior consultants, 14 trainees and 14 medical students). The inter-rater reliability of the test procedure was explored according to examination of test results from 10 subjects using 3 raters (2 blinded).

RESULTS

We found a high inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.90). The assessment procedure sufficiently differentiated the performance of the 3 groups (p < 0.001). Assessment of 6 procedures was necessary to secure a generalizability coefficient >0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

The new assessment procedure proved both valid and reliable.

摘要

背景

国际指南建议学员在监督环境下至少完成 100 例软性支气管镜检查,但这一数字没有依据。客观评估方法可以为学员提供教育反馈,并帮助主管确定何时建立基本能力。以前没有评估工具能够区分学员和专家。

目的

本研究旨在探讨一种新的评估程序的有效性和可靠性,该程序使用标准化评分表,通过多项具有递增难度的任务来测试操作人员。

方法

共有 42 名测试对象(14 名高级顾问、14 名学员和 14 名医学生)在虚拟现实支气管镜模拟器上进行了测试。根据 10 名受试者的测试结果,使用 3 名评分者(2 名盲评),对测试程序的组内一致性进行了评估。

结果

我们发现该评估程序具有很高的组内一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.90)。该评估程序能够充分区分 3 组的表现(p < 0.001)。需要评估 6 个程序才能确保综合系数>0.80。

结论

新的评估程序被证明是有效且可靠的。

相似文献

1
Using performance in multiple simulated scenarios to assess bronchoscopy skills.使用多种模拟场景中的表现来评估支气管镜检查技能。
Respiration. 2011;81(6):483-90. doi: 10.1159/000324452. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
2
Establishing pass/fail criteria for bronchoscopy performance.建立支气管镜检查操作的通过/失败标准。
Respiration. 2012;83(2):140-6. doi: 10.1159/000332333. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
3
Reliable and valid assessment of clinical bronchoscopy performance.临床支气管镜检查性能的可靠和有效评估。
Respiration. 2012;83(1):53-60. doi: 10.1159/000330061. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
4
Development of a standardized curriculum for teaching cystoscopic skills using a computer-based endourologic simulator.使用基于计算机的腔内泌尿外科模拟器开发用于教授膀胱镜检查技能的标准化课程。
Simul Healthc. 2009 Summer;4(2):92-7. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181871c3e.
5
Self-assessment of performance among surgical trainees during simulated procedures in a simulated operating theater.外科实习生在模拟手术室的模拟操作过程中的自我表现评估。
Am J Surg. 2006 Jul;192(1):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.017.
6
Development of a Tool to Assess Basic Competency in the Performance of Rigid Bronchoscopy.开发一种用于评估硬性支气管镜操作基本能力的工具。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Apr;13(4):502-11. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-593OC.
7
Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training.结肠镜检查技能的培训和转移:一项关于模拟器与床旁培训的多国、随机、盲法、对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.017. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
8
Automatic and Objective Assessment of Motor Skills Performance in Flexible Bronchoscopy.自动和客观评估在柔性支气管镜检查中的运动技能表现。
Respiration. 2021;100(4):347-355. doi: 10.1159/000513433. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
Development and pilot testing of an operative competency assessment tool for pediatric direct laryngoscopy and rigid bronchoscopy.开发和初步测试一种用于小儿直接喉镜和硬性支气管镜检查的手术能力评估工具。
Laryngoscope. 2010 Nov;120(11):2294-300. doi: 10.1002/lary.21067.
10
Assessing the skills of surgical residents using simulation.使用模拟评估外科住院医师的技能。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;65(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.11.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence improves bronchoscopy performance: a randomised crossover trial.人工智能改善支气管镜检查性能:一项随机交叉试验。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jan 20;11(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00395-2024. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Artificial intelligence for automatic and objective assessment of competencies in flexible bronchoscopy.用于自动客观评估柔性支气管镜检查能力的人工智能
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):5718-5726. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-841. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
3
Setting proficiency standards for simulation-based mastery learning of short antegrade femoral nail osteosynthesis: a multicenter study.
设定基于模拟的股骨近端逆行钉内固定术掌握程度的熟练标准:一项多中心研究。
Acta Orthop. 2024 May 30;95:275-281. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40812.
4
Assessment of esophagogastroduodenoscopy skills on simulators before real-life performance.在实际操作前通过模拟器评估食管胃十二指肠镜检查技能。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Jun 10;10(6):E815-E823. doi: 10.1055/a-1814-9747. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Bronchoscopy simulation training in the post-pandemic world.支气管镜模拟训练在后疫情时代。
J Bras Pneumol. 2022 Apr 29;48(3):e20210361. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210361. eCollection 2022.
6
Assessment of competence in local anaesthetic thoracoscopy: development and validity investigation of a new assessment tool.局部麻醉胸腔镜检查能力评估:一种新评估工具的开发与效度调查
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul;13(7):3998-4007. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3560.
7
Using structured progress to measure competence in flexible bronchoscopy.使用结构化进展来衡量柔性支气管镜检查的能力。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6797-6805. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2181.
8
Simulators in the training of surgeons: is it worth the investment in money and time? 2018 Jules Gonin lecture of the Retina Research Foundation.外科医生培训中的模拟器:投入金钱和时间是否值得?视网膜研究基金会2018年朱尔斯·戈宁讲座
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 May;257(5):877-881. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04244-y. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
9
Simulation in bronchoscopy: current and future perspectives.支气管镜检查中的模拟:现状与未来展望。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Nov 9;8:755-760. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S139929. eCollection 2017.
10
Distributed practice. The more the merrier? A randomised bronchoscopy simulation study.分散式练习。越多越好?一项随机支气管镜模拟研究。
Med Educ Online. 2016 May 10;21:30517. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.30517. eCollection 2016.