Cold Kristoffer Mazanti, Agbontaen Kaladerhan, Nielsen Anne Orholm, Andersen Christian Skjoldvang, Singh Suveer, Konge Lars
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Rigshospitalet, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jan 20;11(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00395-2024. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Flexible bronchoscopy is an operator-dependent procedure. An automatic bronchial identification system based on artificial intelligence (AI) could help bronchoscopists to perform more complete and structured procedures through automatic guidance.
101 participants were included from six different continents at the European Respiratory Society annual conference in Milan, 9-13 September 2023. Participants were split into three groups based on experience: novices (0 bronchoscopies), intermediates (1-249 bronchoscopies) and experienced (≥250 bronchoscopies). The participants performed two bronchoscopies on a realistic physical phantom, one with AI (AmbuBronchoSimulatorTrainingGUIDEv.0.0.1, Prototype version, Ambu) and one Standard procedure. The F1-group received AI guidance for their first procedure, the F2-group for their second. A crossover randomisation controlled for learning by testing. All procedures were automatically rated according to the outcome measures: inspected segments, structured progressions and procedure time.
AI guidance caused the participants to inspect more segments (mean difference, paired t-test: +6.0 segments, p<0.001), perform more structured progressions (+5.2 progressions, p<0.001) and spend more time on the procedure (+72 s, p<0.001) compared to their standard procedures. The effects of AI guidance on inspected segments and structured progression were highest for novices but significant for all experience groups: novices (+8.2 segments, p=0.012 and +6.6 progressions, p<0.001), intermediates (+5.7 segments, p=0.006 and +5.1 progressions, p<0.001) and experienced (+4.3 segments, p=0.006 and +3.8 progressions, p<0.016).
AI guidance helped bronchoscopists of all experience levels to inspect more segments in a more structured order. Clinical implementation of AI guidance could help ensure and document more complete bronchoscopy procedures in the future.
可弯曲支气管镜检查是一种依赖操作者的操作。基于人工智能(AI)的自动支气管识别系统可以通过自动引导帮助支气管镜检查人员执行更完整、更结构化的操作。
在2023年9月9日至13日于米兰举行的欧洲呼吸学会年会上,来自六大洲的101名参与者被纳入研究。参与者根据经验分为三组:新手(0次支气管镜检查)、中级(1 - 249次支气管镜检查)和经验丰富者(≥250次支气管镜检查)。参与者在一个逼真的物理模型上进行两次支气管镜检查,一次使用AI(AmbuBronchoSimulatorTrainingGUIDEv.0.0.1,原型版本,Ambu),另一次采用标准操作。F1组在第一次操作时接受AI引导,F2组在第二次操作时接受AI引导。交叉随机化通过测试控制学习效果。所有操作均根据以下结果指标进行自动评分:检查的节段、结构化进展和操作时间。
与标准操作相比,AI引导使参与者检查了更多节段(平均差异,配对t检验:+6.0个节段,p<0.001),进行了更多结构化进展(+5.2次进展,p<0.001),并且在操作上花费了更多时间(+72秒,p<0.001)。AI引导对检查节段和结构化进展的影响在新手组中最大,但对所有经验组均有显著影响:新手(+8.2个节段,p = 0.012和+6.6次进展,p<0.001)、中级(+5.7个节段,p = 0.006和+5.1次进展,p<0.001)和经验丰富者(+4.3个节段,p = 0.006和+3.8次进展,p<0.016)。
AI引导有助于所有经验水平的支气管镜检查人员以更结构化的顺序检查更多节段。AI引导的临床应用有助于在未来确保并记录更完整的支气管镜检查操作。