Suppr超能文献

要停还是不停,这是个问题:关于工作狂和工作投入者的坚持和工作情绪。

To stop or not to stop, that's the question: about persistence and mood of workaholics and work engaged employees.

机构信息

Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, PO 80140, 3508, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Behav Med. 2011 Dec;18(4):361-72. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9143-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although workaholics and work engaged employees both work long hours, they seem to have a different underlying motivation to do so. The mood as input model might offer an explanation for the difference in work persistence of these employees. This model suggests that the interplay of mood and "persistence rules" (enough and enjoyment rules) may lead to different kinds of persistence mechanisms.

PURPOSE

The aims of this study are to present a scale for measuring persistence rules, the Work Persistence rules Checklist (WoPeC), to analyze its psychometric properties and to test the mood as input model in relationship with workaholism and work engagement.

METHOD

Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Results of a confirmatory factor analysis in study 1 provided support for the hypothesized factor structure of the WoPeC. In study 2, it appeared that the use of an enough and an enjoyment rule for determining when to continue working is related to workaholism and work engagement, respectively. Furthermore, it was hypothesized and found that negative mood is related to workaholism, whereas positive mood is associated with work engagement. The expected interactions between mood and persistence rules on workaholism and work engagement were not demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Mood and persistence rules seem relevant for explaining the difference between workaholism and work engagement.

摘要

背景

虽然工作狂和工作投入的员工都工作很长时间,但他们似乎有不同的内在动机。情绪作为输入模型可能可以解释这些员工在工作坚持性方面的差异。该模型表明,情绪和“坚持规则”(足够和享受规则)的相互作用可能导致不同类型的坚持机制。

目的

本研究旨在提出一种衡量坚持规则的量表,即工作坚持规则检查表(WoPeC),分析其心理测量学特性,并检验情绪作为输入模型与工作狂和工作投入的关系。

方法

采用结构方程模型对数据进行分析。

结果

研究 1 中的验证性因子分析结果支持 WoPeC 假设的因子结构。在研究 2 中,似乎足够和享受规则用于确定何时继续工作与工作狂和工作投入分别相关。此外,研究假设并发现,消极情绪与工作狂有关,而积极情绪与工作投入有关。情绪和坚持规则对工作狂和工作投入的预期交互作用并未得到证实。

结论

情绪和坚持规则似乎与解释工作狂和工作投入之间的差异有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b812/3212689/ea87e3fae0e4/12529_2011_9143_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Workaholic and work engaged employees: dead ringers or worlds apart?
J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Oct;16(4):468-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024392.
3
Job autonomy in relation to work engagement and workaholism: Mediation of autonomous and controlled work motivation.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018 Jul 4;31(4):445-458. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01197. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
6
[The role of a tool in measuring negative consequences of workaholism].
Med Pr. 2016;67(4):467-76. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00325.
7
The Unintended Effect of Perceived Transformational Leadership Style on Workaholism: The Mediating Role of Work Motivation.
J Psychol. 2020;154(6):446-465. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2020.1776203. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Irrational beliefs at work and their implications for workaholism.
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):336-46. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9416-7.
9
It's Been a Hard Day's Night and I've Been Working Like a Dog: Workaholism and Work Engagement in the JD-R Model.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 21;10:1444. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01444. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

2
Lack of control over work and organizational citizenship behavior: overwork climate as a suppressor variable.
Health Psychol Rep. 2020 Sep 2;9(1):31-38. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2020.98678. eCollection 2021.
3
Effect of role overload on missed nursing care in China: The role of work addiction and leader-member exchange.
Nurs Open. 2023 May;10(5):3153-3163. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1565. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
Does Sex in Managerial Positions Really Matter? Differences in Work-Related Feelings and Behaviors.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Dec 16;14:2045-2058. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S327141. eCollection 2021.
5
Differential Effects of Workaholism and Work Engagement on the Interference Between Life and Work Domains.
Eur J Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;14(4):863-879. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1626. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
The Firepower of Work Craving: When Self-Control Is Burning under the Rubble of Self-Regulation.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169729. eCollection 2017.
9
Irrational beliefs at work and their implications for workaholism.
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Sep;23(3):336-46. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9416-7.
10
Workaholism and sleep quality among Japanese employees: a prospective cohort study.
Int J Behav Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):66-76. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9286-6.

本文引用的文献

1
How does workaholism affect worker health and performance? The mediating role of coping.
Int J Behav Med. 2010 Jun;17(2):154-60. doi: 10.1007/s12529-010-9077-x.
2
Mood-as-input and depressive rumination.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Feb;48(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.10.004. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
4
Influence of flexibility and variability of working hours on health and well-being.
Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(6):1125-37. doi: 10.1080/07420520601087491.
5
Workaholism: definition, measurement, and preliminary results.
J Pers Assess. 1992 Feb;58(1):160-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_15.
7
Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work.
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Jun;88(3):518-28. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518.
8
Job burnout.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.
9
Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors.
J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):219-30. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.5.2.219.
10
Organizational impact of workaholism: suggestions for researching the negative outcomes of excessive work.
J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):70-84. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.70.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验