Psychology Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1650, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):498-504. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0073-1.
The ecological valence theory (EVT) posits that preference for a color is determined by people's average affective response to everything associated with it (Palmer & Schloss, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 8877-8882, 2010). The EVT thus implies the existence of sociocultural effects: Color preference should increase with positive feelings (or decrease with negative feelings) toward an institution strongly associated with a color. We tested this prediction by measuring undergraduates' color preferences at two rival universities, Berkeley and Stanford, to determine whether students liked their university's colors better than their rivals did. Students not only preferred their own colors more than their rivals did, but the degree of their preference increased with self-rated positive affect ("school spirit") for their university. These results support the EVT's claim that color preference is caused by learned affective responses to associated objects and institutions, because it is unlikely that students choose their university or develop their degree of school spirit on the basis of preexisting color preferences.
生态价理论(EVT)认为,对一种颜色的偏好取决于人们对与之相关的所有事物的平均情感反应(Palmer & Schloss,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107,8877-8882,2010)。因此,EVT 暗示了社会文化影响的存在:颜色偏好应该随着对一个与颜色强烈相关的机构的积极感受(或负面感受)的增加而增加。我们通过在两所竞争对手的大学——伯克利和斯坦福——测量本科生的颜色偏好来检验这一预测,以确定学生是否比他们的竞争对手更喜欢自己大学的颜色。学生不仅更喜欢自己的颜色,而且他们对自己大学的积极影响(“校园精神”)的评价越高,他们的偏好程度就越高。这些结果支持 EVT 的主张,即颜色偏好是由对相关物体和机构的习得情感反应引起的,因为学生不太可能根据预先存在的颜色偏好选择他们的大学或发展他们的校园精神程度。