• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颜色偏好中时间和个体差异的生态框架。

An ecological framework for temporal and individual differences in color preferences.

作者信息

Schloss Karen B, Palmer Stephen E

机构信息

University of Wisconsin - Madison, Department of Psychology, Brogden Hall, 1202 West Johnson Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA; University of Wisconsin - Madison, Wisconsin Institute for Discovery, 330 N. Orchard St., Madison, WI 53715, USA.

University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, 3210 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2017.01.010
PMID:28456532
Abstract

There are well-known and extensive differences in color preferences between individuals, but there are also within-individual differences from one time to another. Despite the seeming independence between these individual and temporal effects, we propose that they have the same underlying cause: people's ecological experiences with color-associated objects and events. Our approach is motivated by the Ecological Valence Theory (EVT; Palmer & Schloss, 2010) which states that preference for a given color is determined by the combined valence (liking/disliking) of all objects and events associated with that color. We define three ecologically-based hypotheses for explaining temporal and individual differences in color preferences concerning: (1) differences in object valences, (2) differences in color-object associations, and (3) differences in object activations in the mind when preferences are measured. We review prior studies that support these hypotheses and raise open research questions about untested predictions. We also extend the computational framework of the EVT by defining a single weighted average equation that captures both individual and temporal differences in color preferences. Finally, we consider other factors that potentially contribute to color preferences, including abstract symbolic associations, color in design, and psychophysical and/or physiological factors.

摘要

个体之间在颜色偏好上存在着广为人知的显著差异,而且个体在不同时间也存在内部差异。尽管这些个体和时间效应看似相互独立,但我们认为它们有着相同的潜在原因:人们与颜色相关的物体和事件的生态体验。我们的方法受到生态效价理论(EVT;Palmer & Schloss,2010)的启发,该理论指出对特定颜色的偏好由与该颜色相关的所有物体和事件的综合效价(喜欢/不喜欢)决定。我们定义了三个基于生态的假设,用于解释颜色偏好中的时间和个体差异,涉及:(1)物体效价的差异,(2)颜色 - 物体关联的差异,以及(3)在测量偏好时脑海中物体激活的差异。我们回顾了支持这些假设的先前研究,并提出了关于未经检验预测的开放性研究问题。我们还通过定义一个单一的加权平均方程来扩展EVT的计算框架,该方程捕捉了颜色偏好中的个体和时间差异。最后,我们考虑了其他可能影响颜色偏好的因素,包括抽象的符号关联、设计中的颜色,以及心理物理和/或生理因素。

相似文献

1
An ecological framework for temporal and individual differences in color preferences.颜色偏好中时间和个体差异的生态框架。
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Ecological influences on individual differences in color preference.生态因素对颜色偏好个体差异的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2803-16. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0954-x.
3
Seasonal Variations in Color Preference.季节变化对颜色偏好的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;41(6):1589-1612. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12429. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Color preferences change after experience with liked/disliked colored objects.颜色偏好会随着对喜欢/不喜欢的颜色物体的体验而改变。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):935-43. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0423-2.
5
Effects of university affiliation and "school spirit" on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford.大学背景和“校魂”对色彩偏好的影响:伯克利分校与斯坦福大学。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):498-504. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0073-1.
6
The relationship between color-object associations and color preference: further investigation of ecological valence theory.颜色-物体联想与颜色偏好之间的关系:生态效价理论的进一步探讨。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):190-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0222-1.
7
A test of the ecological valence theory of color preference, the case of Arabic.颜色偏好的生态效价理论检验:以阿拉伯语为例
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1010108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010108. eCollection 2022.
8
Color preferences are not universal.颜色偏好并不具有普遍性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1015-27. doi: 10.1037/a0030273. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
9
Ecological Effects in Cross-Cultural Differences Between U.S. and Japanese Color Preferences.美国和日本颜色偏好跨文化差异中的生态效应
Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;40(7):1590-1616. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12291. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
10
An ecological valence theory of human color preference.人类颜色偏好的生态价理论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8877-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906172107. Epub 2010 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric analyses of factors influencing color preferences in urban environmental spaces.城市环境空间中影响色彩偏好因素的文献计量分析。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 9;16:1588644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1588644. eCollection 2025.
2
A test of the ecological valence theory of color preference, the case of Arabic.颜色偏好的生态效价理论检验:以阿拉伯语为例
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 22;13:1010108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010108. eCollection 2022.
3
A case study on the effect of light and colors in the built environment on autistic children's behavior.
关于建筑环境中的光线和颜色对自闭症儿童行为影响的案例研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 30;13:1042641. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1042641. eCollection 2022.
4
Modeling visual aesthetic perception: bridges between computed texture features and perceived beauty qualities in semantic experiments.视觉审美感知建模:语义实验中计算纹理特征与感知美感品质之间的桥梁
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Dec;16(6):1379-1391. doi: 10.1007/s11571-022-09783-5. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual design features: A narrative historical review.基本味觉与视觉设计特征之间的跨通道对应关系:叙事性历史综述。
Iperception. 2022 Oct 11;13(5):20416695221127325. doi: 10.1177/20416695221127325. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
6
Hedonic Preferences to Audio and Visual Stimulation in Seniors with Cognitive Impairments.老年人认知障碍患者对视听刺激的享乐偏好。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;83(3):1353-1366. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210520.
7
Explaining Crossmodal Correspondences Between Colours and Tastes.解释颜色与味道之间的跨通道对应关系。
Iperception. 2021 Jun 20;12(3):20416695211018223. doi: 10.1177/20416695211018223. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
8
Colour-emotion associations in individuals with red-green colour blindness.红绿色盲个体中的颜色-情感关联。
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 7;9:e11180. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11180. eCollection 2021.
9
Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Red on Perceived Attractiveness.红色对感知吸引力影响的荟萃分析。
Evol Psychol. 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1474704918802412. doi: 10.1177/1474704918802412.
10
Seasonal Changes in Color Preferences Are Linked to Variations in Environmental Colors: A Longitudinal Study of Fall.颜色偏好的季节性变化与环境颜色的变化有关:一项秋季纵向研究。
Iperception. 2017 Dec 4;8(6):2041669517742177. doi: 10.1177/2041669517742177. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.