• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颜色偏好会随着对喜欢/不喜欢的颜色物体的体验而改变。

Color preferences change after experience with liked/disliked colored objects.

机构信息

Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):935-43. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0423-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-013-0423-2
PMID:23616112
Abstract

How are color preferences formed, and can they be changed by affective experiences with correspondingly colored objects? We examined these questions by testing whether affectively polarized experiences with images of colored objects would cause changes in color preferences. Such changes are implied by the ecological valence theory (EVT), which posits that color preferences are determined by people's average affective responses to correspondingly colored objects (Palmer & Schloss, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 8877-8882, 2010). Seeing images of strongly liked (and disliked) red and green objects, therefore, should lead to increased (and decreased) preferences for correspondingly colored red and green color patches. Experiment 1 showed that this crossover interaction did occur, but only if participants were required to evaluate their preferences for the colored objects when they saw them. Experiment 2 showed that these overall changes decreased substantially over a 24-h delay, but the degree to which the effect lasted for individuals covaried with the magnitude of the effects immediately after object exposure. Experiment 3 demonstrated a similar, but weaker, effect of affectively biased changes in color preferences when participants did not see, but only imagined, the colored objects. The overall pattern of results indicated that color preferences are not fixed, but rather are shaped by affective experiences with colored objects. Possible explanations for the observed changes in color preferences were considered in terms of associative learning through evaluative conditioning and/or priming of prior knowledge in memory.

摘要

颜色偏好是如何形成的,它们是否可以通过对相应颜色物体的情感体验来改变?我们通过测试对有色物体图像的情感极化体验是否会导致颜色偏好的改变,来研究这些问题。这种改变是由生态价值理论(EVT)所暗示的,该理论认为颜色偏好是由人们对相应颜色物体的平均情感反应决定的(Palmer & Schloss,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107,8877-8882,2010)。因此,看到强烈喜欢(和不喜欢)的红色和绿色物体的图像,应该会导致对相应的红色和绿色色块的偏好增加(和减少)。实验 1 表明,这种交叉相互作用确实发生了,但前提是当参与者看到这些物体时,他们必须评估自己对这些物体的偏好。实验 2 表明,这些总体变化在 24 小时的延迟后会大幅下降,但这种效果持续的程度与个体在暴露于物体后立即产生的效果的大小有关。实验 3 证明了当参与者没有看到,而只是想象这些有色物体时,对颜色偏好的情感偏见变化会产生类似但较弱的影响。总体结果表明,颜色偏好不是固定的,而是由对有色物体的情感体验所塑造的。观察到的颜色偏好变化的可能解释是通过评估条件作用和/或记忆中先前知识的启动来进行联想学习。

相似文献

1
Color preferences change after experience with liked/disliked colored objects.颜色偏好会随着对喜欢/不喜欢的颜色物体的体验而改变。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):935-43. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0423-2.
2
Ecological influences on individual differences in color preference.生态因素对颜色偏好个体差异的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2803-16. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0954-x.
3
An ecological framework for temporal and individual differences in color preferences.颜色偏好中时间和个体差异的生态框架。
Vision Res. 2017 Dec;141:95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 May 9.
4
The relationship between color-object associations and color preference: further investigation of ecological valence theory.颜色-物体联想与颜色偏好之间的关系:生态效价理论的进一步探讨。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):190-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0222-1.
5
Effects of university affiliation and "school spirit" on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford.大学背景和“校魂”对色彩偏好的影响:伯克利分校与斯坦福大学。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):498-504. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0073-1.
6
The politics of color: preferences for Republican red versus Democratic blue.颜色的政治:对共和党红色与民主党蓝色的偏好。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1481-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0635-0.
7
Seasonal Variations in Color Preference.季节变化对颜色偏好的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Aug;41(6):1589-1612. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12429. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
8
Color preferences in infants and adults are different.婴儿和成人的颜色偏好不同。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):916-22. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0411-6.
9
An ecological valence theory of human color preference.人类颜色偏好的生态价理论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8877-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906172107. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
10
Human preferences for colorful birds: Vivid colors or pattern?人类对色彩斑斓鸟类的偏好:鲜艳的颜色还是图案?
Evol Psychol. 2015 Apr 29;13(2):339-59. doi: 10.1177/147470491501300203.

引用本文的文献

1
Light-eye-body axis: exploring the network from retinal illumination to systemic regulation.光眼-身体轴:探索从视网膜光照到全身调节的网络。
Theranostics. 2025 Jan 2;15(4):1496-1523. doi: 10.7150/thno.106589. eCollection 2025.
2
Do we feel colours? A systematic review of 128 years of psychological research linking colours and emotions.我们能感知颜色吗?对128年以来将颜色与情感联系起来的心理学研究的系统综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jan 13. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02615-z.
3
Increased color preference through the introduction of luminance noise in chromatic stimuli.

本文引用的文献

1
Associative learning of likes and dislikes: Some current controversies and possible ways forward.喜欢和不喜欢的联想学习:一些当前的争议和可能的前进方向。
Cogn Emot. 2005 Feb 1;19(2):161-74. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000265.
2
The relationship between color-object associations and color preference: further investigation of ecological valence theory.颜色-物体联想与颜色偏好之间的关系:生态效价理论的进一步探讨。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):190-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0222-1.
3
Effects of university affiliation and "school spirit" on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford.
在色觉刺激中引入亮度噪声以增加颜色偏好。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 12;14(1):18711. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69690-z.
4
Androgens and child behavior: Color and toy preferences in children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).雄激素与儿童行为:先天性肾上腺皮质增生症(CAH)患儿的颜色和玩具偏好。
Horm Behav. 2023 Mar;149:105310. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105310. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
5
The contour effect: Differences in the aesthetic preference and stress response to photo-realistic living environments.轮廓效应:对逼真生活环境的审美偏好和应激反应的差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:933344. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933344. eCollection 2022.
6
Clothing Aesthetics: Consistent Colour Choices to Match Fair and Tanned Skin Tones.服装美学:搭配白皙和晒黑肤色的一致色彩选择。
Iperception. 2021 Nov 15;12(6):20416695211053361. doi: 10.1177/20416695211053361. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Colour-emotion associations in individuals with red-green colour blindness.红绿色盲个体中的颜色-情感关联。
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 7;9:e11180. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11180. eCollection 2021.
8
A Theoretical Framework for How We Learn Aesthetic Values.关于我们如何学习审美价值的理论框架。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Sep 11;14:345. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00345. eCollection 2020.
9
Ten simple rules to colorize biological data visualization.生物数据可视化上色的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Oct 15;16(10):e1008259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008259. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Infants look longer at colours that adults like when colours are highly saturated.当颜色高度饱和时,婴儿会比成人更喜欢看颜色,并且看的时间更长。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Feb;27(1):78-85. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01688-5.
大学背景和“校魂”对色彩偏好的影响:伯克利分校与斯坦福大学。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Jun;18(3):498-504. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0073-1.
4
Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis.人类评估性条件作用:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):390-421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916.
5
An ecological valence theory of human color preference.人类颜色偏好的生态价理论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107(19):8877-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906172107. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
6
Biological components of sex differences in color preference.颜色偏好中性别差异的生物学组成部分。
Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R623-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.022.
7
Associative learning of likes and dislikes: a review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning.喜欢与厌恶的联想学习:对25年人类评价性条件反射研究的综述
Psychol Bull. 2001 Nov;127(6):853-69. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853.