• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在结局、暴露或混杂因素中存在缺失数据的情况下,因果暴露效应的双重稳健估计量。

Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4382-400. doi: 10.1002/sim.5643. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1002/sim.5643
PMID:23086504
Abstract

We consider the estimation of the causal effect of a binary exposure on a continuous outcome. Confounding and missing data are both likely to occur in practice when observational data are used to estimate this causal effect. In dealing with each of these problems, model misspecification is likely to introduce bias. We present augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimators that account for both confounding and missing data, with the latter occurring in a single variable only. These estimators have an element of robustness to misspecification of the models used. Our estimators require two models to be specified to deal with confounding and two to deal with missing data. Only one of each of these models needs to be correctly specified. When either the outcome or the exposure of interest is missing, we derive explicit expressions for the AIPW estimator. When a confounder is missing, explicit derivation is complex, so we use a simple algorithm, which can be applied using standard statistical software, to obtain an approximation to the AIPW estimator.

摘要

我们考虑估计二元暴露对连续结果的因果效应。在使用观察数据估计这种因果效应时,混杂和数据缺失在实践中都很可能发生。在处理这两个问题时,模型误设定都可能引入偏差。我们提出了增强逆概率加权(AIPW)估计量,它同时考虑了混杂和数据缺失,后者仅在一个变量中发生。这些估计量对于所使用模型的误设定具有一定的稳健性。我们的估计量需要指定两个模型来处理混杂,两个模型来处理缺失数据。每个模型只需要正确指定一个。当感兴趣的结局或暴露缺失时,我们推导出 AIPW 估计量的显式表达式。当混杂因子缺失时,显式推导很复杂,因此我们使用一个简单的算法,该算法可以使用标准统计软件应用,以获得 AIPW 估计量的近似值。

相似文献

1
Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.在结局、暴露或混杂因素中存在缺失数据的情况下,因果暴露效应的双重稳健估计量。
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 30;31(30):4382-400. doi: 10.1002/sim.5643. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
2
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
3
On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.在因果推断中的模型选择和模型误设定。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):7-30. doi: 10.1177/0962280210387717. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
4
Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.模型误设定和平均因果效应逆概率加权估计的偏差。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2100118. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100118. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
5
Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.平均因果效应的分层双稳健估计量。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):270-7. doi: 10.1111/biom.12157. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
6
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.AIPW:用于平均因果效应的增强逆概率加权估计的 R 包。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2690-2699. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab207.
8
Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.使用逻辑回归和倾向评分分层法估计边缘比值比的估计值和置信区间。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):760-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3811.
9
Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.结局模型误设对用于估计因果效应的回归及双重稳健逆概率加权法的影响。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 15. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1207.
10
Augmented and doubly robust G-estimation of causal effects under a Structural nested failure time model.结构嵌套失效时间模型下因果效应的增强型和双重稳健G估计
Biometrics. 2018 Jun;74(2):472-480. doi: 10.1111/biom.12749. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Robust causal inference for point exposures with missing confounders.针对存在混杂因素缺失的点暴露进行稳健的因果推断。
Can J Stat. 2025 Jun;53(2). doi: 10.1002/cjs.11832. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
School-age outcomes among IVF and ICSI-conceived children: a causal inference analysis using linked population-wide data.体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕儿童的学龄期结局:一项使用全人群关联数据的因果推断分析。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 1;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03963-w.
3
Double Sampling for Informatively Missing Data in Electronic Health Record-Based Comparative Effectiveness Research.
基于电子健康记录的比较效果研究中信息性缺失数据的双重抽样
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):6086-6098. doi: 10.1002/sim.10298. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
4
Clinicians Who Practice Primarily in Nursing Homes and the Quality of End-of-Life Care Among Residents.主要在养老院行医的临床医生和居民的临终关怀质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242546. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2546.
5
Covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials with missing covariate and outcome data.存在协变量和结局数据缺失的随机临床试验中的协变量调整。
Stat Med. 2023 Sep 30;42(22):3919-3935. doi: 10.1002/sim.9840. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
6
Sample size calculation for randomized trials via inverse probability of response weighting when outcome data are missing at random.随机缺失数据时基于反应概率逆加权的随机试验样本量计算。
Stat Med. 2023 May 20;42(11):1802-1821. doi: 10.1002/sim.9700. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
7
School-age outcomes among IVF-conceived children: A population-wide cohort study.体外受精受孕儿童的学龄期结局:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Jan 24;20(1):e1004148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004148. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Evaluation of predictive model performance of an existing model in the presence of missing data.评估存在缺失数据时现有模型的预测模型性能。
Stat Med. 2021 Jul 10;40(15):3477-3498. doi: 10.1002/sim.8978. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
9
Handling Missing Data in Instrumental Variable Methods for Causal Inference.因果推断工具变量法中的缺失数据处理
Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2019 Mar;6(1):125-148. doi: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100353. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
10
Robust and efficient semi-supervised estimation of average treatment effects with application to electronic health records data.具有应用于电子健康记录数据的稳健且高效的平均处理效应的半监督估计。
Biometrics. 2021 Jun;77(2):413-423. doi: 10.1111/biom.13298. Epub 2020 May 25.