Global Health Group, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017155.
In 2008, over 300,000 women died during pregnancy or childbirth, mostly in poor countries. While there are proven interventions to make childbirth safer, there is uncertainty about the best way to deliver these at large scale. In particular, there is currently a debate about whether maternal deaths are more likely to be prevented by delivering effective interventions through scaled up facilities or via community-based services. To inform this debate, we examined delivery location and attendance and the reasons women report for giving birth at home.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We conducted a secondary analysis of maternal delivery data from Demographic and Health Surveys in 48 developing countries from 2003 to the present. We stratified reported delivery locations by wealth quintile for each country and created weighted regional summaries. For sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where death rates are highest, we conducted a subsample analysis of motivations for giving birth at home. In SSA, South Asia, and Southeast Asia, more than 70% of all births in the lowest two wealth quintiles occurred at home. In SSA, 54.1% of the richest women reported using public facilities compared with only 17.7% of the poorest women. Among home births in SSA, 56% in the poorest quintile were unattended while 41% were attended by a traditional birth attendant (TBA); 40% in the wealthiest quintile were unattended, while 33% were attended by a TBA. Seven per cent of the poorest women reported cost as a reason for not delivering in a facility, while 27% reported lack of access as a reason. The most common reason given by both the poorest and richest women for not delivering in a facility was that it was deemed "not necessary" by a household decision maker. Among the poorest women, "not necessary" was given as a reason by 68% of women whose births were unattended and by 66% of women whose births were attended.
In developing countries, most poor women deliver at home. This suggests that, at least in the near term, efforts to reduce maternal deaths should prioritize community-based interventions aimed at making home births safer.
2008 年,超过 30 万名妇女在妊娠或分娩期间死亡,其中大部分发生在贫困国家。虽然有已证实的干预措施可提高分娩安全性,但对于如何大规模实施这些干预措施仍存在不确定性。特别是,目前关于通过扩大设施提供有效的干预措施或通过基于社区的服务来预防产妇死亡,哪种方法更有效存在争议。为了为这场争论提供信息,我们研究了分娩地点和接生人员以及妇女报告在家分娩的原因。
方法/主要发现:我们对来自 48 个发展中国家的 2003 年至今的人口与健康调查中的产妇分娩数据进行了二次分析。我们按每个国家的财富五分位数对报告的分娩地点进行分层,并创建了加权区域总结。对于撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA),由于死亡率最高,我们对在家分娩的动机进行了子样本分析。在 SSA、南亚和东南亚,最低两个财富五分位数的所有分娩中有超过 70%发生在家中。在 SSA,54.1%的最富裕妇女报告使用公共设施,而最贫穷妇女中只有 17.7%。在 SSA 的家中分娩中,最贫穷五分位数中有 56%无人接生,而 41%由传统接生员(TBA)接生;最富裕五分位数中有 40%无人接生,而 33%由 TBA 接生。7%的最贫穷妇女报告说费用是不在设施中分娩的原因,而 27%报告说无法获得是原因。最贫穷和最富裕妇女都最常见的不在设施中分娩的原因是家庭决策者认为“没有必要”。在最贫穷的妇女中,68%无人接生的妇女和 66%有人接生的妇女都将“没有必要”作为一个原因。
在发展中国家,大多数贫困妇女在家中分娩。这表明,至少在短期内,减少产妇死亡的努力应优先考虑以社区为基础的干预措施,旨在使家庭分娩更安全。