Suppr超能文献

用于分子力学计算的极化模型的发展 I:原子极化率的参数化。

Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations I: parameterization of atomic polarizability.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Chem B. 2011 Mar 31;115(12):3091-9. doi: 10.1021/jp112133g. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

Abstract

In this work, four types of polarizable models have been developed for calculating interactions between atomic charges and induced point dipoles. These include the Applequist, Thole linear, Thole exponential model, and the Thole Tinker-like. The polarizability models have been optimized to reproduce the experimental static molecular polarizabilities obtained from the molecular refraction measurements on a set of 420 molecules reported by Bosque and Sales. We grouped the models into five sets depending on the interaction types, that is, whether the interactions of two atoms that form the bond, bond angle, and dihedral angle are turned off or scaled down. When 1-2 (bonded) and 1-3 (separated by two bonds) interactions are turned off, 1-4 (separated by three bonds) interactions are scaled down, or both, all models including the Applequist model achieved similar performance: the average percentage error (APE) ranges from 1.15 to 1.23%, and the average unsigned error (AUE) ranges from 0.143 to 0.158 Å(3). When the short-range 1-2, 1-3, and full 1-4 terms are taken into account (set D models), the APE ranges from 1.30 to 1.58% for the three Thole models, whereas the Applequist model (DA) has a significantly larger APE (3.82%). The AUE ranges from 0.166 to 0.196 Å(3) for the three Thole models, compared with 0.446 Å(3) for the Applequist model. Further assessment using the 70-molecule van Duijnen and Swart data set clearly showed that the developed models are both accurate and highly transferable and are in fact have smaller errors than the models developed using this particular data set (set E models). The fact that A, B, and C model sets are notably more accurate than both D and E model sets strongly suggests that the inclusion of 1-2 and 1-3 interactions reduces the transferability and accuracy.

摘要

在这项工作中,开发了四种可极化模型来计算原子电荷和诱导点偶极子之间的相互作用。这些模型包括 Applequist、Thole 线性、Thole 指数模型和 Thole Tinker 类似模型。优化了可极化模型以重现从 Bosque 和 Sales 报道的一组 420 个分子的分子折射测量中获得的实验静态分子极化率。我们根据相互作用类型将模型分为五组,即键、键角和二面角形成的两个原子的相互作用是否关闭或缩小。当关闭 1-2(键合)和 1-3(通过两个键分离)相互作用,或缩小 1-4(通过三个键分离)相互作用,或者两者都有时,包括 Applequist 模型在内的所有模型都表现出相似的性能:平均百分比误差(APE)范围在 1.15%到 1.23%之间,平均无符号误差(AUE)范围在 0.143 到 0.158 Å(3)之间。当考虑短程 1-2、1-3 和完整 1-4 项(D 组模型)时,三个 Thole 模型的 APE 范围在 1.30%到 1.58%之间,而 Applequist 模型(DA)的 APE 明显更大(3.82%)。三个 Thole 模型的 AUE 范围在 0.166 到 0.196 Å(3)之间,而 Applequist 模型的 AUE 为 0.446 Å(3)。使用 70 分子的 van Duijnen 和 Swart 数据集进行的进一步评估清楚地表明,所开发的模型既准确又具有高度的可转移性,实际上比使用该特定数据集(E 组模型)开发的模型具有更小的误差。A、B 和 C 模型组明显比 D 和 E 模型组更准确,这一事实强烈表明包含 1-2 和 1-3 相互作用会降低可转移性和准确性。

相似文献

5
Atomic Polarizabilities for Interactive Dipole Induction Models.相互作用偶极感应模型的原子极化率。
J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Jan 10;62(1):79-87. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01307. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
7
Fast approaches for molecular polarizability calculations.分子极化率计算的快速方法。
J Phys Chem A. 2007 May 24;111(20):4443-8. doi: 10.1021/jp068423w. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
9
Thole model for ionic liquid polarizability.离子液体极化率的 Thole 模型。
J Phys Chem A. 2013 Jan 10;117(1):219-27. doi: 10.1021/jp3105908. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
10
Bond-Dependent Thole Model for Polarizability and Spectroscopy.用于极化率和光谱学的键依赖索勒模型
J Phys Chem A. 2019 Jun 27;123(25):5378-5387. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b12011. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

9
Unexpected polarization properties of sub-nanosized magnesium clusters.亚纳米级镁团簇的意外极化特性。
RSC Adv. 2023 Jan 27;13(6):4065-4076. doi: 10.1039/d2ra08086a. eCollection 2023 Jan 24.
10
Machine Learning Exciton Hamiltonians in Light-Harvesting Complexes.机器学习在光捕获复合物中的激发子哈密顿量。
J Chem Theory Comput. 2023 Feb 14;19(3):965-977. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01044. Epub 2023 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

2
Polarization effects in molecular mechanical force fields.分子力学力场中的极化效应。
J Phys Condens Matter. 2009 Aug 19;21(33):333102. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/33/333102. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
3
QM/MM methods for biomolecular systems.用于生物分子系统的量子力学/分子力学方法。
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(7):1198-229. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802019.
4
Continuum polarizable force field within the Poisson-Boltzmann framework.泊松-玻尔兹曼框架内的连续极化力场。
J Phys Chem B. 2008 Jun 26;112(25):7675-88. doi: 10.1021/jp7110988. Epub 2008 May 29.
5
Fast approaches for molecular polarizability calculations.分子极化率计算的快速方法。
J Phys Chem A. 2007 May 24;111(20):4443-8. doi: 10.1021/jp068423w. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
6
7
Gaussian induced dipole polarization model.高斯诱导偶极极化模型。
J Comput Chem. 2007 May;28(7):1261-74. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20574.
10
Force fields for protein simulations.用于蛋白质模拟的力场。
Adv Protein Chem. 2003;66:27-85. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(03)66002-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验