Department of Environmental Health Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
J Appl Microbiol. 2011 Jun;110(6):1470-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.04996.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
Pathogenic Vibrio spp., including V. cholerae and V. vulnificus, are commonly found along the estuaries of the south-east United States; however, it is often difficult to recover these species directly from environmental samples. Pre-enrichment assays are commonly used to improve the detection of pathogenic vibrios from environmental sources. Here, we evaluated a novel enrichment procedure using freshly collected and autoclaved natural estuarine water amended with 1% peptone (designated as estuarine peptone water, EPW) and compared it to traditional alkaline peptone water (APW) for detection by PCR of V. cholerae and V. vulnificus.
Of the 50 samples collected in total, V. cholerae DNA was detected in APW 10% of the time and in EPW 40% of the time. Likewise, the cholera toxin gene (ctxA) was detected in 4 vs 18% of the samples using APW and EPW, respectively. Conversely, APW showed improved recovery for V. vulnificus relative to EPW with respective detection frequencies of 46 and 20%. Results showed similar patterns across different sample types (water and plankton).
While enrichment in traditional APW was adequate for the recovery of Vibrio vulnificius, use of sterile estuarine water amended with peptone significantly improved the detection of V. cholerae and the virulence gene ctxA from estuarine sources.
致病性弧菌属,包括霍乱弧菌和创伤弧菌,在美国东南部的河口处很常见;然而,直接从环境样本中恢复这些物种通常很困难。预富集检测常用于提高从环境来源检测致病性弧菌的能力。在此,我们评估了一种使用新鲜采集并经高压灭菌的天然河口水样,添加 1%蛋白胨(命名为河口蛋白胨水,EPW)的新型富集程序,并将其与传统碱性蛋白胨水(APW)进行比较,用于检测霍乱弧菌和创伤弧菌的 PCR。
在总共采集的 50 个样本中,APW 中检测到霍乱弧菌 DNA 的时间为 10%,而 EPW 中检测到霍乱弧菌 DNA 的时间为 40%。同样,用 APW 和 EPW 分别检测到霍乱毒素基因(ctxA)的样本比例为 4%和 18%。相反,APW 对创伤弧菌的回收率高于 EPW,分别为 46%和 20%。结果表明,不同类型的样本(水和浮游生物)都呈现出相似的模式。
虽然传统的 APW 富集足以恢复创伤弧菌,但使用添加蛋白胨的无菌河口水可显著提高从河口来源检测霍乱弧菌和毒力基因 ctxA 的能力。