Sinclair David, Abba Katharine, Zaman K, Qadri Firdausi, Graves Patricia M
International Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, UK, L3 5QA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD008603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008603.pub2.
This review is superseded by the published Cochrane Review, Saif‐Ur‐Rahman 2024 [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014573], which considers only the oral killed vaccines because the live oral vaccines do not have World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification. Saif‐Ur‐Rahman 2024 also considered only currently available WHO pre‐qualified oral killed cholera vaccines (Dukoral, Shanchol, and Euvichol/Euvichol‐Plus).
Cholera is a cause of acute watery diarrhoea which can cause dehydration and death if not adequately treated. It usually occurs in epidemics, and is associated with poverty and poor sanitation. Effective, cheap, and easy to administer vaccines could help prevent epidemics.
To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral cholera vaccines in preventing cases of cholera and deaths from cholera.
In October 2010, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; EMBASE; LILACS; the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT), and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant published and ongoing trials.
Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of oral cholera vaccines in healthy adults and children.
Each trial was assessed for eligibility and risk of bias by two authors working independently. Data was extracted by two independent reviewers and analysed using the Review Manager 5 software. Outcomes are reported as vaccine protective efficacy (VE) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Seven large efficacy trials, four small artificial challenge studies, and twenty-nine safety trials contributed data to this review.Five variations of a killed whole cell vaccine have been evaluated in large scale efficacy trials (four trials, 249935 participants). The overall vaccine efficacy during the first year was 52% (95% CI 35% to 65%), and during the second year was 62% (95% CI 51% to 62%). Protective efficacy was lower in children aged less than 5 years; 38% (95% CI 20% to 53%) compared to older children and adults; 66% (95% CI 57% to 73%).One trial of a killed whole cell vaccine amongst military recruits demonstrated 86% protective efficacy (95% CI 37% to 97%) in a small epidemic occurring within 4 weeks of the 2-dose schedule (one trial, 1426 participants). Efficacy data is not available beyond two years for the currently available vaccine formulations, but based on data from older trials is unlikely to last beyond three years.The safety data available on killed whole cell vaccines have not demonstrated any clinically significant increase in adverse events compared to placebo.Only one live attenuated vaccine has reached Phase III clinical evaluation and was not effective (one trial, 67508 participants). Two new candidate live attenuated vaccines have demonstrated clinical effectiveness in small artificial challenge studies, but are still in development.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The currently available oral killed whole cell vaccines can prevent 50 to 60% of cholera episodes during the first two years after the primary vaccination schedule. The impact and cost-effectiveness of adopting oral cholera vaccines into the routine vaccination schedule of endemic countries will depend on the prevalence of cholera, the frequency of epidemics, and access to basic services providing rapid rehydration therapy.
本综述已被已发表的Cochrane系统评价Saif‐Ur‐Rahman 2024 [https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014573] 取代,该综述仅考虑口服灭活疫苗,因为口服活疫苗未获得世界卫生组织(WHO)的预认证。Saif‐Ur‐Rahman 2024也仅考虑目前可用的WHO预认证口服灭活霍乱疫苗(Dukoral、Shanchol和Euvichol/Euvichol-Plus)。
霍乱是急性水样腹泻的一个病因,如果治疗不充分,可导致脱水和死亡。它通常以流行形式出现,与贫困和卫生条件差有关。有效、廉价且易于接种的疫苗有助于预防疫情。
评估口服霍乱疫苗在预防霍乱病例和霍乱死亡方面的有效性和安全性。
2010年10月,我们检索了Cochrane传染病组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS、对照试验元注册库(mRCT)以及WHO国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP),以查找相关的已发表和正在进行的试验。
针对健康成人和儿童的口服霍乱疫苗随机或半随机对照试验。
由两位独立工作的作者对每项试验进行资格评估和偏倚风险评估。数据由两名独立的审阅者提取,并使用Review Manager 5软件进行分析。结果以疫苗保护效力(VE)及95%置信区间(CI)报告。
七项大型效力试验、四项小型人工激发研究和二十九项安全性试验为本综述提供了数据。在大规模效力试验中评估了灭活全细胞疫苗的五种变体(四项试验,249935名参与者)。第一年的总体疫苗效力为52%(95%CI 35%至65%),第二年为62%(95%CI 51%至62%)。5岁以下儿童的保护效力较低,为38%(95%CI 20%至53%),而年龄较大的儿童和成人则为66%(95%CI 57%至73%)。一项针对新兵的灭活全细胞疫苗试验显示,在两剂接种方案后4周内发生的一次小范围疫情中,保护效力为86%(95%CI 37%至97%)(一项试验,1426名参与者)。目前可用疫苗制剂超过两年的效力数据不可得,但根据早期试验的数据,效力不太可能持续超过三年。关于灭活全细胞疫苗的安全性数据未显示与安慰剂相比不良事件有任何临床上的显著增加。只有一种减毒活疫苗进入了III期临床评估且无效(一项试验,67508名参与者)。两种新的候选减毒活疫苗在小型人工激发研究中显示出临床有效性,但仍在研发中。
目前可用的口服灭活全细胞疫苗在初次接种疫苗方案后的头两年可预防50%至60%的霍乱发作。将口服霍乱疫苗纳入流行国家的常规疫苗接种计划的影响和成本效益将取决于霍乱的流行程度、疫情发生频率以及获得提供快速补液治疗的基本服务的情况。