Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga, 849-8501, Japan.
Environ Health Prev Med. 2011 Jan;16(1):52-60. doi: 10.1007/s12199-010-0165-y. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pertinent cutoffs of waist circumference (WC) and the discriminatory performance of other anthropometric indices to detect clustering cardiovascular risk factors for metabolic syndrome (MetS) in Japan, where the current WC cutoffs for MetS (85 cm for men and 90 cm for women) remain controversial. METHODS: We analyzed the baseline data from 844 subjects (330 men and 514 women) aged 40-69 years who participated in a cohort study in Saga city, Japan, between November 2005 and December 2007. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to find an appropriate cutoff (defined as the point nearest to the upper left corner of the ROC curve) of each anthropometric index for the presence of multiple risk factors among dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia [which was defined as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at and above 5.2, 5.5, or 5.8%, values approximately corresponding to fasting plasma glucose levels of 100, 110, and 120 mg/dL, respectively]. RESULTS: The optimal WC cutoff was 88 cm (sensitivity 60%, specificity 70%) for men and 82 cm (sensitivity 78%, specificity 62%) for women; changing the HbA1c cutoff affected the results in women only (~85 cm). For the currently defined WC cutoffs in Japan, specificity was low (53-57%) in men, whereas sensitivity was very low (32-42%) in women. Body mass index, proportion of body fat, waist-to-height ratio, and waist-to-hip ratio showed area under the curve values similar to that of WC. CONCLUSION: The current Japanese criteria of WC for MetS may be low for men and too high and insensitive for women in our study population. Other anthropometric indices such as waist-to-height ratio did not confer an improved discriminatory performance compared with WC.
目的:评估腰围(WC)的相关切点以及其他人体测量学指标的判别性能,以检测日本代谢综合征(MetS)心血管危险因素聚集情况,因为目前日本的 MetS WC 切点(男性 85cm,女性 90cm)仍存在争议。
方法:我们分析了 2005 年 11 月至 2007 年 12 月期间在日本佐贺市参加队列研究的 844 名 40-69 岁受试者(330 名男性和 514 名女性)的基线数据。进行了接收者操作特征(ROC)分析,以找到每个人体测量学指标的适当切点(定义为最接近 ROC 曲线左上角的点),以检测血脂异常、高血压和高血糖[定义为血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)水平≥5.2%、5.5%或 5.8%,分别对应空腹血糖水平约为 100、110 和 120mg/dL]中多种危险因素的存在。
结果:男性的最佳 WC 切点为 88cm(敏感性 60%,特异性 70%),女性为 82cm(敏感性 78%,特异性 62%);改变 HbA1c 切点仅影响女性的结果(约 85cm)。对于日本目前定义的 WC 切点,男性的特异性较低(53-57%),而女性的敏感性非常低(32-42%)。体重指数、体脂百分比、腰高比和腰臀比的曲线下面积值与 WC 相似。
结论:在我们的研究人群中,目前日本的 MetS WC 标准对男性可能过低,对女性则过高且不敏感。与 WC 相比,其他人体测量学指标如腰高比并没有提供更好的判别性能。
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2019-9-30
BMC Public Health. 2020-8-31
Int J Obes (Lond). 2023-4
Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2017-7-30
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016-4-16
N Engl J Med. 2010-3-4
Diabetes Care. 2008-1