Tufts University, 490 Boston Ave, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1910-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.018. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
Comparisons of word and picture processing using event-related potentials (ERPs) are contaminated by gross physical differences between the two types of stimuli. In the present study, we tackle this problem by comparing picture processing with word processing in an alphabetic and a logographic script, that are also characterized by gross physical differences. Native Mandarin Chinese speakers viewed pictures (line drawings) and Chinese characters (Experiment 1), native English speakers viewed pictures and English words (Experiment 2), and naïve Chinese readers (native English speakers) viewed pictures and Chinese characters (Experiment 3) in a semantic categorization task. The varying pattern of differences in the ERPs elicited by pictures and words across the three experiments provided evidence for (i) script-specific processing arising between 150 and 200 ms post-stimulus onset, (ii) domain-specific but script-independent processing arising between 200 and 300 ms post-stimulus onset, and (iii) processing that depended on stimulus meaningfulness in the N400 time window. The results are interpreted in terms of differences in the way visual features are mapped onto higher-level representations for pictures and words in alphabetic and logographic writing systems.
使用事件相关电位 (ERPs) 进行字词和图片处理的比较受到两种刺激类型之间的巨大物理差异的污染。在本研究中,我们通过在一种字母和一种表意文字脚本中比较图片处理和文字处理来解决这个问题,这两种脚本也具有明显的物理差异。母语为汉语的被试在语义分类任务中观看图片(线条图)和汉字(实验 1),以英语为母语的被试观看图片和英语单词(实验 2),以及天真的中国读者(以英语为母语的被试)观看图片和汉字(实验 3)。三个实验中由图片和文字引起的 ERP 差异的变化模式为以下几点提供了证据:(i)刺激后 150 至 200 毫秒之间出现的特定于脚本的处理,(ii)刺激后 200 至 300 毫秒之间出现的特定于域但独立于脚本的处理,以及(iii)在 N400 时间窗口中取决于刺激有意义性的处理。结果根据在字母和表意文字书写系统中,图片和文字的视觉特征映射到更高层次表示的方式的差异进行解释。