Institut Scientifique d'Hygiène et d'Analyse (ISHA), 25 Ave. de la République, 91300 Massy, France.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 May;77(10):3360-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00020-11. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
In Europe, the Drinking Water Directive of the European Commission indicates which methods (most of which are CEN/ISO-standardized methods) should be used for the analysis of microbiological parameters (European Commission, Environment, Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998). According to the Directive, alternative methods "may be used, providing it can be demonstrated that the results obtained are at least as reliable as those produced by the methods specified." The prerequisite for the routine use of any alternative method is to provide evidence that this method performs equivalently to the corresponding reference method. In this respect, the ISO 16140 standard (ISO, ISO 16140. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs-Protocol for the Validation of Alternative Methods, 2003) represents a key issue in generating such a procedure based on an interlaboratory study. A new statistical tool, called the accuracy profile, has been developed to better interpret the data. The study presented here is based upon the enumeration of Escherichia coli bacteria in water. The reference method may require up to 72 h to provide a confirmed result. The aim of this publication is to present data for an alternative method by which results can be obtained in 18 h (Colilert-18/Quanti-Tray) based upon defined substrate technology (DST). The accuracy profile is a statistical and graphical decision-making tool and consists of simultaneously combining, in a single graphic, β expectation tolerance intervals (β-ETIs) and acceptability limits (λ). The study presents the validation criteria calculated at the three levels of contamination used in the trial for a β equal to 80% and a λ equal to ±0.3 and combines the accuracy profiles of Escherichia coli for a λ of ±0.3 log₁₀ unit/100 ml, a λ of ±0.4 log₁₀ unit/100 ml, and a β of 80% or 90%. Several interesting conclusions can be drawn from these data. The accuracy profile method has been applied to the validation of the Colilert-18/Quanti-Tray method against reference method ISO 9308-1 (ISO, ISO 9308-1. Water Quality--Detection and Enumeration of Escherichia coli and Coliform Bacteria. Part 1. Membrane Filtration Method, 2000), using a β of 80% and a λ of 0.4; the alternative method can be validated between 1.00 and 2.05 log₁₀ units/100 ml, equivalent to 10 to 112 CFU/100 ml.
在欧洲,欧盟委员会的《饮用水指令》规定了应使用哪些方法(其中大多数是 CEN/ISO 标准化方法)来分析微生物参数(欧盟委员会,环境,理事会指令 98/83/EC,1998 年 11 月 3 日)。根据该指令,“可以使用替代方法,只要能够证明所得到的结果至少与指定方法一样可靠”。任何替代方法常规使用的前提条件是证明该方法与相应的参考方法等效。在这方面,ISO 16140 标准(ISO,ISO 16140. 食品和动物饲料的微生物学-替代方法验证的协议,2003 年)是基于实验室间研究生成此类程序的关键问题。一种新的统计工具,称为准确度概况,已被开发用于更好地解释数据。本研究基于水中大肠杆菌细菌的计数。参考方法可能需要长达 72 小时才能提供确认结果。本出版物的目的是介绍一种替代方法的数据,该方法可以在 18 小时内(Colilert-18/Quanti-Tray)基于定义的基质技术(DST)获得结果。准确度概况是一种统计和图形决策工具,由同时组合在单个图形中的 β 期望公差区间(β-ETIs)和可接受性限(λ)组成。该研究介绍了在试验中使用的三个污染水平计算的验证标准,β 等于 80%,λ 等于±0.3,并结合了大肠杆菌的准确度概况,λ 为±0.3 log₁₀ 个单位/100 ml,λ 为±0.4 log₁₀ 个单位/100 ml,β 为 80%或 90%。从这些数据中可以得出几个有趣的结论。已经应用准确度概况方法对 Colilert-18/Quanti-Tray 方法与参考方法 ISO 9308-1(ISO,ISO 9308-1. 水质-大肠杆菌和大肠菌群的检测和计数。第 1 部分:膜过滤法,2000 年)进行了验证,β 为 80%,λ 为 0.4;替代方法可以在 1.00 到 2.05 log₁₀ 个单位/100 ml 之间验证,相当于 10 到 112 CFU/100 ml。