Suppr超能文献

重大生活事件与缺血性心脏病风险:积累会增加风险吗?

Major life events and the risk of ischaemic heart disease: does accumulation increase the risk?

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;40(4):904-13. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr052. Epub 2011 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stress is a consequence of different types of external demands, most of which have been shown to be associated with increased risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), but whether accumulation of stressors over a life-course results in additional risk of IHD remains unknown. This study investigates the impact of major life events (MLE) in childhood, adulthood and at work, singly and accumulated, on incident IHD in men and women and examines vital exhaustion (VE) and use of tranquillizers as potential mediators. Material and methods The study includes 8738 participants, 57% women, from the third wave of the Copenhagen City Heart Study, who in 1991-93 answered a range of questions on MLE, VE and use of tranquillizers. The participants were followed in a nationwide hospital discharge register until 2007.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 653 experienced a first-time incident of IHD. In general, there were no associations between MLE and incidence of IHD. However, being placed in care during childhood was associated with a higher risk of IHD among women [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.36; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.97-1.89], but a lower risk of IHD among men (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.51-1.03). MLE showed a dose-response association with psychological risk factors with highest estimates for those exposed to MLE in all three life domains: VE [odds ratio (OR) = 15.07; 95% CI 8.97-25.31] and use of tranquillizers (OR = 4.41; 95% CI 3.10-6.26).

CONCLUSION

This prospective study finds no associations between accumulated MLE and IHD. MLE is, however, strongly associated with VE and use of tranquillizers. The results underscore the problems in conceptualizing and measuring MLE.

摘要

背景

压力是各种类型外部需求的结果,其中大多数已被证明与缺血性心脏病(IHD)风险增加有关,但一生中压力源的积累是否会导致 IHD 风险增加尚不清楚。本研究调查了童年、成年和工作中重大生活事件(MLE)的单独和累积影响对男性和女性发生 IHD 的影响,并研究了潜在的中介因素——极度疲劳(VE)和使用镇静剂。

材料和方法

该研究包括来自哥本哈根城市心脏研究第三波的 8738 名参与者,其中 57%为女性,他们在 1991-93 年回答了一系列关于 MLE、VE 和使用镇静剂的问题。参与者在全国性医院出院登记处进行随访,直至 2007 年。

结果

在随访期间,有 653 人经历了首次 IHD 事件。一般来说,MLE 与 IHD 发病率之间没有关联。然而,童年时被安置在护理机构中的女性发生 IHD 的风险较高(HR=1.36;95%置信区间 95%CI 0.97-1.89),而男性发生 IHD 的风险较低(HR=0.72;95%CI 0.51-1.03)。MLE 与心理风险因素呈剂量反应关系,在所有三个生活领域中暴露于 MLE 的人风险最高:VE(OR=15.07;95%CI 8.97-25.31)和使用镇静剂(OR=4.41;95%CI 3.10-6.26)。

结论

这项前瞻性研究发现,累积 MLE 与 IHD 之间没有关联。然而,MLE 与 VE 和使用镇静剂密切相关。研究结果突出了概念化和测量 MLE 存在的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验