• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自下而上:构建参与式评估模型。

From the ground up: building a participatory evaluation model.

作者信息

Sánchez Victoria, Carrillo Christina, Wallerstein Nina

机构信息

University of New Mexico, NM, USA.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):45-52. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0007.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2011.0007
PMID:21441668
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We engaged in a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project with the New Mexico Department of Health (DOH) and its 32 county-based health councils.

OBJECTIVES

We report on the process of the collaborative development of an evaluation model that would identify and link council actions to intermediate system change.

METHODS

We used multiple data sources and interactive, iterative processes to systematically examine and document the health council system including document review, a statewide partnership survey, and multiple meetings with partners.

LESSONS LEARNED

We highlight lessons and challenges in our CBPR process, including the need for community partners to overcome the fear of evaluation, the use of multiple participatory mechanisms, the value of a linking agent, and understanding multiple data needs.

CONCLUSION

The time and resources of this participatory evaluation process enabled successful navigation of two important issues: (1) increased attention to statewide accountability of collaborative public health initiatives, and (2) increased expectation by health councils or other community partnerships to have a recognized voice in defining measures for this accountability.

摘要

背景

我们与新墨西哥州卫生部(DOH)及其32个县级卫生委员会开展了一项基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)项目。

目标

我们报告了一个评估模型的合作开发过程,该模型将确定卫生委员会的行动并将其与中间系统变革联系起来。

方法

我们使用了多个数据源以及互动式、迭代式过程,对卫生委员会系统进行系统检查和记录,包括文件审查、全州范围的伙伴关系调查以及与合作伙伴的多次会议。

经验教训

我们强调了CBPR过程中的经验教训和挑战,包括社区合作伙伴需要克服对评估的恐惧、使用多种参与机制、联络人的价值以及理解多种数据需求。

结论

这种参与性评估过程所花费的时间和资源使得我们成功应对了两个重要问题:(1)更加关注协作性公共卫生倡议在全州范围内的问责制;(2)卫生委员会或其他社区伙伴关系在界定该问责制衡量标准方面拥有公认发言权的期望有所增加。

相似文献

1
From the ground up: building a participatory evaluation model.自下而上:构建参与式评估模型。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):45-52. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0007.
2
Building community participatory research coalitions from the ground up: the Philadelphia area research community coalition.从头开始构建社区参与式研究联盟:费城地区研究社区联盟
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Spring;3(1):61-72. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0052.
3
A community-centered model of the academic health department and implications for assessment.以社区为中心的学术健康部门模式及其评估意义。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):662-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000296145.32789.9d.
4
The origins and overview of the W. K. Kellogg Community Health Scholars Program.W.K. 凯洛格社区健康学者项目的起源与概述。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Winter;3(4):335-48. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0098.
5
Building capacity for community-based participatory research for health disparities in Canada: the case of "Partnerships in Community Health Research".建设加拿大基于社区的参与性健康差异研究能力:以“社区健康研究伙伴关系”为例。
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Mar;12(2):280-92. doi: 10.1177/1524839909355520. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
6
The Healthy Connections project: a community-based participatory research project involving women at risk for diabetes and hypertension.健康联系项目:一个基于社区的参与性研究项目,涉及有患糖尿病和高血压风险的女性。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Winter;3(4):273-4. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0089.
7
CBPR as community health intervention: institutionalizing CBPR within community based organizations.基于社区的参与式研究作为社区健康干预措施:在社区组织中使基于社区的参与式研究制度化。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):145-55. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0019.
8
Special issue: three models of community-based participatory research.特刊:基于社区的参与性研究的三种模式
LDI Issue Brief. 2013 Apr;18(5):1-8.
9
Participatory development and implementation of a community research workshop: experiences from a community-based participatory research partnership.社区研究工作坊的参与式发展与实施:基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系的经验
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2009 Summer;3(2):165-78. doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0068.
10
Finding needles in a haystack: a methodology for identifying and sampling community-based youth smoking cessation programs.在干草堆里找针:一种识别和抽样基于社区的青少年戒烟计划的方法。
Eval Rev. 2010 Feb;34(1):35-51. doi: 10.1177/0193841X09355258.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-production of the quality of patient-centered outcomes research partnerships instrument for people with mental health conditions.以患者为中心的心理健康状况患者结局研究伙伴关系工具质量的联合生产。
Patient Exp J. 2021;8(1):148-156. doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1533.
2
Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research.达成利益相关者参与研究原则的共识。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):117-127. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0014.
3
EVALUATING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH: QUANTITATIVE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT.
评估研究中的社区参与:定量测量方法的开发
J Community Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):17-32. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21828. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
4
A Retrospective on the Vision for : .对……愿景的回顾 : 。 你提供的原文“A Retrospective on the Vision for :.”似乎不太完整,冒号后面缺少具体内容,请补充完整以便能更准确地翻译。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(1):1-11. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0001.
5
The State as Community in Community-Based Participatory Research.基于社区的参与性研究中的国家作为社区
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(4):515-522. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0059.
6
Community-University Partnerships for Research and Practice: Application of an Interactive and Contextual Model of Collaboration.社区与大学研究及实践伙伴关系:一种交互式情境合作模式的应用
J High Educ Outreach Engagem. 2016;20(2):55-84.
7
Approaches to community nursing research partnerships: a case example.社区护理研究伙伴关系的方法:一个案例
J Transcult Nurs. 2014 Apr;25(2):129-36. doi: 10.1177/1043659613515721. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
8
Training partnership dyads for community-based participatory research: strategies and lessons learned from the Community Engaged Scholars Program.基于社区的参与式研究的培训伙伴关系二元组:从社区参与学者项目中学到的策略与经验教训。
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jul;14(4):524-33. doi: 10.1177/1524839912461273. Epub 2012 Oct 22.