West of Scotland Pancreatic Unit and Department of Pathology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 May 15;17(10):3316-31. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3284. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
The management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continues to present a great challenge particularly with regard to prediction of outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Molecular markers have been extensively investigated by numerous groups with the aim of enhancing prognostication; however, despite hundreds of studies that have sought to assess the potential prognostic value of molecular markers in predicting the clinical course following resection of PDAC, at this time, no molecular marker assay forms part of recommended clinical practice.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature for immunohistochemistry-based biomarkers of PDAC outcome. A dual search strategy was applied to the PubMed database on January 6, 2010, to identify cohort studies that reported associations between immunohistochemical biomarker expression and survival outcomes in PDAC, and conformed to the REMARK (REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies) criteria.
A total of 103 distinct proteins met all inclusion criteria. Promising markers that emerged for the prediction of overall survival included BAX (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.71-0.56), Bcl-2 (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.27-0.63), survivin (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.73), Ki-67: (HR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.87-3.14), COX-2 (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.13-1.71), E-cadherin (HR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.33-2.42), and S100 calcium-binding proteins, in particular S100A2 (HR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.58-6.62).
We noted that that there was incomplete adherence to the REMARK guidelines with inadequate methodology reporting as well as failure to perform multivariate analysis. Addressing the persistent incomplete adoption of these criteria may eventually result in the incorporation of molecular marker assessment within PDAC management algorithms.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的治疗仍然是一个巨大的挑战,尤其是在预测胰十二指肠切除术后的预后方面。许多研究小组已经广泛研究了分子标志物,旨在提高预后预测的准确性;然而,尽管有数百项研究试图评估分子标志物在预测 PDAC 切除后临床过程中的潜在预后价值,但目前,没有任何分子标志物检测方法被纳入推荐的临床实践。
我们对发表的有关 PDAC 结果的免疫组织化学生物标志物的文献进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。2010 年 1 月 6 日,我们应用双重搜索策略搜索了 PubMed 数据库,以确定报告 PDAC 中免疫组织化学生物标志物表达与生存结果之间相关性的队列研究,并符合 REMARK(肿瘤标志物预后研究报告建议)标准。
共有 103 种不同的蛋白质符合所有纳入标准。对于总生存预测,有前途的标志物包括 BAX(HR=0.31,95%CI:0.71-0.56)、Bcl-2(HR=0.41,95%CI:0.27-0.63)、survivin(HR=0.46,95%CI:0.29-0.73)、Ki-67:(HR=2.42,95%CI:1.87-3.14)、COX-2(HR=1.39,95%CI:1.13-1.71)、E-钙粘蛋白(HR=1.80,95%CI:1.33-2.42)和 S100 钙结合蛋白,特别是 S100A2(HR=3.23,95%CI:1.58-6.62)。
我们注意到,REMARK 指南的遵循情况并不完整,方法报告不充分,并且未能进行多变量分析。解决这些标准持续不完整采用的问题,最终可能会导致 PDAC 管理算法中纳入分子标志物评估。