World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 28;17(8):953-62. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i8.953.
Knowledge on pancreaticobiliary reflux in normal pancreaticobiliary junction and its pathologic implications has experienced tremendous progress during the last few years. This editorial reviews the current knowledge on this condition and its pathological implications on gallbladder diseases. The following aspects were defined appropriate for discussion: (1) Evidence of carcinogenesis associated with pancreaticobiliary reflux; (2) Evidence of pancreaticobiliary reflux in normal pancreaticobiliary junction; and (3) Evidence of sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction as a cause of pancreaticobiliary reflux in normal pancreaticobiliary junction. The articles reviewed were selected and classified according to five levels of evidence: Level I, meta-analysis double-blind randomized clinical trials, Level II, cohort non-blinded studies and non-randomized clinical trials, Level III, good quality case-control studies and non-randomized cohort studies, Level IV, case series and poor quality case-control studies, and Level V, case report articles and experts' opinion. Evidence levels II, III, IV and V were found to support biliary carcinogenesis associated with pancreaticobiliary reflux in normal and abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction. The same levels of evidence were found to support the common occurrence of pancreaticobiliary reflux in normal pancreaticobiliary junction, and SO dysfunction as the most plausible cause of this condition. Although an important body of research has been published regarding pancreaticobiliary reflux in normal pancreaticobiliary junction and its clinical significance, the current evidence does not fully support what has been suggested. Studies with evidence level I have not been undertaken. This is a fascinating subject of study, and if finally supported by evidence level I, the importance of this condition will constitute a major breakthrough in biliary pathology.
近年来,人们对正常胆胰管连接部胆胰反流的认识及其病理意义取得了巨大进展。本社论回顾了有关胆胰反流及其对胆囊疾病病理意义的现有知识。以下几个方面被认为适合讨论:(1)与胆胰反流相关的致癌证据;(2)正常胆胰管连接部胆胰反流的证据;(3)Oddi 括约肌(SO)功能障碍作为正常胆胰管连接部胆胰反流的原因的证据。所审查的文章根据证据水平分为五类进行选择和分类:I 级,荟萃分析双盲随机临床试验;II 级,队列非盲研究和非随机临床试验;III 级,高质量病例对照研究和非随机队列研究;IV 级,病例系列和低质量病例对照研究;V 级,病例报告文章和专家意见。证据水平 II、III、IV 和 V 支持胆胰反流与正常和异常胆胰管连接部的胆道癌变有关。同样的证据水平也支持正常胆胰管连接部胆胰反流的常见发生,以及 SO 功能障碍是这种情况最合理的原因。尽管已经发表了大量关于正常胆胰管连接部胆胰反流及其临床意义的研究,但现有证据并不完全支持已提出的观点。尚未进行具有 I 级证据的研究。这是一个引人入胜的研究课题,如果最终得到 I 级证据的支持,这种情况的重要性将构成胆道病理学的重大突破。