• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙龈卟啉单胞菌在临时固定修复材料上的细菌黏附

Bacterial adhesion of porphyromonas gingivalis on provisional fixed prosthetic materials.

作者信息

Zortuk Mustafa, Kesim Servet, Kaya Esma, Ozbilge Hatice, Kiliç Kerem, Cölgeçen Ozlem

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2010 Winter;7(1):35-40.

PMID:21448445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3065340/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When provisional restorations are worn for long term period, the adhesion of bacteria becomes a primary factor in the development of periodontal diseases. The aims of this study were to evaluate the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of four different provisional fixed prosthodon-tic materials.

METHODS

Ten cylindrical specimens were prepared from bis-acrylic composites (PreVISION CB and Protemp 3 Garant), a light-polymerized composite (Revotek LC), and a polymethyl methacrylate-based (Dentalon) provisional fixed prosthodontic materials. Surface roughness was assessed by profilometry. The bacterial adhesion test was applied using Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) and spectro-fluorometric method. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Dunnett t-tests.

RESULTS

All tested materials were significantly rougher than glass (P < 0.05). Revotek LC had the greatest fluorescence intensity, PreVISION and Protemp 3 Garant had moderate values and all of them had significantly more bacterial adhesion compared to glass (P < 0.05). Dentalon had the lowest fluorescence intensity among the provisional fixed prosthodontic materials.

CONCLUSION

The quantity of bacterial adhesion and surface roughness differed among the assessed provisional fixed prosthodontic materials. The light-polymerized provisional material Revotek LC had rougher surface and more bacterial adhesion compared with the others.

摘要

背景

当临时修复体长期佩戴时,细菌黏附成为牙周疾病发生发展的主要因素。本研究的目的是评估四种不同临时固定修复材料的表面粗糙度和细菌黏附情况。

方法

从双丙烯酸复合材料(PreVISION CB和Protemp 3 Garant)、光固化复合材料(Revotek LC)和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯基(Dentalon)临时固定修复材料制备十个圆柱形试件。通过轮廓仪评估表面粗糙度。使用牙龈卟啉单胞菌(P. gingivalis)和荧光分光光度法进行细菌黏附试验。采用方差分析和Dunnett t检验进行统计分析。

结果

所有测试材料均比玻璃显著粗糙(P < 0.05)。Revotek LC具有最高的荧光强度,PreVISION和Protemp 3 Garant荧光强度中等,与玻璃相比,它们的细菌黏附均显著更多(P < 0.05)。Dentalon在临时固定修复材料中荧光强度最低。

结论

在所评估的临时固定修复材料中,细菌黏附量和表面粗糙度存在差异。与其他材料相比,光固化临时材料Revotek LC表面更粗糙,细菌黏附更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/288497c913ec/DRJ-7-35-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/d02834be1ab6/DRJ-7-35-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/00e7df815e73/DRJ-7-35-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/dfac322cd5cf/DRJ-7-35-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/288497c913ec/DRJ-7-35-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/d02834be1ab6/DRJ-7-35-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/00e7df815e73/DRJ-7-35-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/dfac322cd5cf/DRJ-7-35-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67ec/3065340/288497c913ec/DRJ-7-35-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Bacterial adhesion of porphyromonas gingivalis on provisional fixed prosthetic materials.牙龈卟啉单胞菌在临时固定修复材料上的细菌黏附
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2010 Winter;7(1):35-40.
2
Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.变形链球菌对临时固定义齿修复材料的细菌黏附
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Dec;98(6):461-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60146-2.
3
Effects of various finishing procedures on the staining of provisional restorative materials.各种修整程序对临时修复材料染色的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 May;93(5):453-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.001.
4
Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials.不同饮品对树脂复合材料临时修复材料染色性的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Aug;94(2):118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.004.
5
Effects of different repolishing techniques on colour change of provisional prosthetic materials.不同再抛光技术对临时修复材料颜色变化的影响。
Stomatologija. 2009;11(4):102-12.
6
The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.两种抛光膏对双丙烯酸酯复合材料和甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):527-32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129335.
7
Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontic materials.临时固定义齿修复材料的显微硬度
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Nov;82(5):525-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70050-8.
8
Shear bond strength of provisional restoration materials repaired with light-cured resins.用光固化树脂修复的临时修复材料的剪切粘结强度。
Oper Dent. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):508-15. doi: 10.2341/07-130.
9
Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.基质类型对三种用于临时冠和固定局部义齿的树脂表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):141-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00392.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Colour stability of provisional crown and bridge restoration materials.临时冠桥修复材料的颜色稳定性。
Br Dent J. 1998 Nov 14;185(9):468-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809839.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion on Provisional Crowns Fabricated With Milled Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Conventional Acrylic Resin: A Prospective Clinical Trial.用铣削聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和传统丙烯酸树脂制作的临时冠上微生物黏附的比较评估:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 13;16(7):e64469. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64469. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Biocompatibility and biofilm formation on conventional and CAD/CAM provisional implant restorations.传统和 CAD/CAM 临时种植体修复体的生物相容性和生物膜形成。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03468-z.
3
Piranha-etched titanium nanostructure reduces biofilm formation in vitro.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of different fiber concentrations on the surface roughness of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resin.不同纤维浓度对临时冠和固定局部义齿树脂表面粗糙度的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2008 Jul;2(3):185-90.
2
Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.变形链球菌对临时固定义齿修复材料的细菌黏附
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Dec;98(6):461-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60146-2.
3
Flexural properties of glass fibre reinforced acrylic resin polymers.玻璃纤维增强丙烯酸树脂聚合物的弯曲性能
食人鱼蚀刻钛纳米结构减少体外生物膜形成。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):6187-6197. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05235-4. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
4
Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses.用于制作种植体支持修复体的材料上生物膜形成的比较分析。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S812-S815. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Porcelain Fused to Metal and Stainless-Steel Crown Following Ultrasonic and Hand Scaling: A Comparative Study.超声洁治和手工洁治后烤瓷熔附金属冠与不锈钢冠表面粗糙度的比较评估:一项对比研究
Cureus. 2022 Jul 22;14(7):e27134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27134. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
How Navigate the Map: The Effect of Surface Topography on the Adhesion of on Biomaterials.如何导航地图:表面形貌对生物材料上细胞黏附的影响
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 18;15(14):4988. doi: 10.3390/ma15144988.
7
Evaluation of and adherence on different provisional crown materials.不同临时冠材料的评价与依从性
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Oct;9(5):335-340. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.335. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Evaluation of hardness and wear resistance of interim restorative materials.临时修复材料的硬度和耐磨性评估。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Mar;10(2):184-9. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.113338.
Aust Dent J. 2006 Mar;51(1):52-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00401.x.
4
Porphyromonas gingivalis-epithelial cell interactions in periodontitis.牙周炎中牙龈卟啉单胞菌与上皮细胞的相互作用
J Dent Res. 2006 May;85(5):392-403. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500502.
5
Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.体外条件下牙科材料的表面粗糙度和光泽度与压力及抛光时间的关系
Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):146-65. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.013. Epub 2005 Aug 9.
6
Effects of various finishing procedures on the staining of provisional restorative materials.各种修整程序对临时修复材料染色的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 May;93(5):453-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.001.
7
Effect of storage solution on surface roughness of provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials.储存溶液对临时冠和固定局部义齿材料表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2004 Dec;13(4):227-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04039.x.
8
Flexural properties of prosthetic provisional polymers.义齿临时聚合物的弯曲性能。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004 Jun;12(2):75-9.
9
Color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials.临时修复材料的颜色稳定性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 May;91(5):447-52. doi: 10.1016/S0022391304001283.
10
Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system.变形链球菌在连续流动系统中对各种修复材料的黏附情况。
J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Mar;31(3):278-85. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01233.x.