Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2011 May;23(3):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
To evaluate work-related stress as well as personal factors associated with professional burnout in program directors of anesthesiology.
Survey instrument.
Academic anesthesiology department.
Anesthesiology residency program directors (n = 132).
A 5-part structured, open-ended questionnaire evaluating program and respondents' demographic information, work-related stressors, assessment of control of respondent's personal life using the modified efficiency scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services survey (MBI-HSS), and assessment of spousal/significant relationship support.
100 program directors (76%) responded to the survey. Twenty respondents met the criteria for high burnout risk, and an additional 30 were at risk of developing burnout. Twenty-two directors reported the high likelihood that they would step down in one to two years. Forty-three percent who reported the high likelihood of stepping down stated they were significantly affected by job-related stressors compared with 18% who reported a lower likelihood of stepping down (P = 0.03). Program directors who scored in the high burnout risk category were more likely to report lower current job satisfaction (P < 0.005) and an increased likelihood of stepping down in the next two years (P = 0.009). Logistic regression analysis identified compliance issues, self-assessment of effectiveness, family/significant other support, perceived impact of stressful factors, and current job satisfaction as predictors of high burnout. The model had a sensitivity (95% CI) of 0.55 (0.34 to 0.74) and specificity of 0.99 (0.92 to 1.0) for predicting high burnout risk.
Fifty-two percent of anesthesiology program directors are at high risk for developing burnout syndrome. Job-related stress, especially with administrative duties regarding compliance, was predictive of burnout among program directors.
评估麻醉学项目主任的工作相关压力以及与职业倦怠相关的个人因素。
调查工具。
学术麻醉学系。
麻醉住院医师培训计划主任(n = 132)。
一个由 5 部分组成的结构化、开放式问卷,评估项目和受访者的人口统计学信息、工作相关压力源、使用改良效率量表评估受访者个人生活的控制程度、Maslach 职业倦怠量表-人力资源服务调查(MBI-HSS)和配偶/重要关系支持评估。
100 名主任(76%)对调查做出了回应。20 名主任符合高倦怠风险标准,另有 30 名主任有发展为倦怠的风险。22 名主任报告说他们很有可能在一到两年内辞职。43%报告高辞职可能性的人表示,与报告低辞职可能性的人(18%)相比,他们受到工作相关压力源的影响显著(P = 0.03)。处于高倦怠风险类别的主任更有可能报告当前工作满意度较低(P < 0.005),并且在未来两年内辞职的可能性增加(P = 0.009)。逻辑回归分析确定了合规问题、自我评估的有效性、家庭/重要他人的支持、压力因素的感知影响以及当前工作满意度是高倦怠的预测因素。该模型对高倦怠风险的预测具有 0.55(0.34 至 0.74)的敏感性(95%CI)和 0.99(0.92 至 1.0)的特异性。
52%的麻醉学项目主任有发展为倦怠综合征的高风险。工作相关压力,尤其是与合规相关的行政职责,是主任倦怠的预测因素。