Department of Neurology, Neuromuscular Centre Nijmegen, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Neurol. 2011 Oct;258(10):1820-6. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6027-8. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
The aim of the study was to investigate health status in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) and determine its relationship to pain and fatigue. Data on health status (SF-36), pain (MPQ) and fatigue (CIS-fatigue) were collected for the Dutch DM2 population (n = 32). Results were compared with those of sex- and age-matched adult-onset myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) patients. In addition, we compared the obtained scores on health status of the DM2 group with normative data of the Dutch general population (n = 1742). Compared to DM1, the SF-36 score for bodily pain was significantly (p = 0.04) lower in DM2, indicating more body pain in DM2. DM2 did not differ from DM1 on any other SF-36 scales. In comparison to the Dutch population, DM2 patients reported lower scores (indicating worse clinical condition) on the physical functioning, role functioning-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and role functioning-emotional scales (p < 0.01 on all scales). The difference was most profound for the physical functioning scale. In the DM2 group the severity of pain was significantly correlated with SF-36 scores for bodily pain (p = 0.003). Fatigue was significantly correlated with the SF-36 scores for role functioning-physical (p = 0.001), general health (p = 0.02), and vitality (p = 0.02). The impact of DM2 on a patients' physical, psychological and social functioning is significant and as high as in adult-onset DM1 patients. From the perspective of health-related quality of life, DM2 should not be considered a benign disease. Management of DM2 patients should include screening for pain and fatigue. Symptomatic treatment of pain and fatigue may decrease disease impact and help improve health status in DM2, even if the disease itself cannot be treated.
研究目的在于调查 2 型肌强直性营养不良(DM2)患者的健康状况,并确定其与疼痛和疲劳的关系。收集了 32 名荷兰 DM2 患者的健康状况(SF-36)、疼痛(MPQ)和疲劳(CIS-疲劳)数据。结果与性匹配和年龄匹配的成年发病型肌强直性营养不良 1 型(DM1)患者进行了比较。此外,我们还将 DM2 组获得的健康状况评分与荷兰普通人群的常模数据(n=1742)进行了比较。与 DM1 相比,DM2 患者的身体疼痛 SF-36 评分显著降低(p=0.04),表明 DM2 患者身体疼痛更严重。DM2 在其他 SF-36 量表上与 DM1 无差异。与荷兰人群相比,DM2 患者在生理功能、身体角色功能、身体疼痛、一般健康、活力、社会功能和情感角色功能方面的评分较低(所有量表上的 p<0.01)。身体功能障碍评分的差异最为显著。在 DM2 组中,疼痛的严重程度与 SF-36 身体疼痛评分显著相关(p=0.003)。疲劳与 SF-36 身体角色功能(p=0.001)、一般健康(p=0.02)和活力(p=0.02)评分显著相关。DM2 对患者生理、心理和社会功能的影响显著,与成年发病型 DM1 患者相当。从健康相关生活质量的角度来看,DM2 不应被视为良性疾病。DM2 患者的管理应包括疼痛和疲劳筛查。疼痛和疲劳的对症治疗可能会降低疾病的影响,并有助于改善 DM2 患者的健康状况,即使无法治疗疾病本身。