Suppr超能文献

在临床环境中进行体内和体外评估的脂蛋白转移蛋白交叉反应:优缺点。

Lipid transfer protein cross-reactivity assessed in vivo and in vitro in the office: pros and cons.

机构信息

Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, Italy.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(2):129-36.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies analyze cross-reactivity between lipid transfer proteins (LTP) from a large spectrum of botanically unrelated plant-derived foods using routine diagnostic tests.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical usefulness of currently available in vivo and in vitro tests in LTP-hypersensitive patients.

METHODS

An in vitro and in vivo study was performed of 15 peach-allergic adults monosensitized to LTP in order to analyze their allergy and hypersensitivity to apple, hazelnut, walnut, peanut, soybean, lentil, maize, celery, carrot, banana, melon, tomato, kiwi, buckwheat, and sunflower, poppy, mustard, and sesame seeds.

RESULTS

The study revealed that 8, 7, 10, 5, 3, 2, 1, 1, and 1 patients were allergic to apple, hazelnut, walnut, peanut, tomato, kiwi, melon, lentil, and maize, respectively. Immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels for peach were strongly associated with the total number of offending foods other than peach and with levels of IgE specific for all the study foods except carrot. Both in vivo and in vitro tests showed excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value, but poor specificity and positive predictive value. Sensitized but tolerant patients showed lower IgE levels than those with a history of local or systemic symptoms, although the difference between the 3 subsets was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that peach is the primary sensitizer to LTP and that the level of IgE to peach LTP is the main factor associated with cross-reactivity (and clinical allergy) to non-Rosaceae foods. Clinically irrelevant sensitization is common in LTP-hypersensitive patients, and positive in vivo and/or in vitro test results are of little help in detecting potential clinical reactors.

摘要

背景

很少有研究使用常规诊断测试分析来自不同植物来源食物的脂转移蛋白(LTP)之间的交叉反应性。

目的

评估目前可用于 LTP 过敏患者的体内和体外检测的临床实用性。

方法

对 15 名仅对 LTP 过敏的桃过敏成人进行了体外和体内研究,以分析他们对苹果、榛子、核桃、花生、大豆、扁豆、玉米、芹菜、胡萝卜、香蕉、瓜、番茄、猕猴桃、荞麦和向日葵、罂粟、芥菜和芝麻的过敏和过敏反应。

结果

研究表明,8、7、10、5、3、2、1、1 和 1 名患者分别对苹果、榛子、核桃、花生、番茄、猕猴桃、瓜、扁豆和玉米过敏。桃的免疫球蛋白(Ig)E 水平与除桃以外的所有引起过敏的食物总数以及除胡萝卜以外的所有研究食物的特异性 IgE 水平密切相关。体内和体外检测均显示出良好的敏感性和阴性预测值,但特异性和阳性预测值较差。过敏但耐受的患者的 IgE 水平低于有局部或全身症状史的患者,尽管这 3 个亚组之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论

本研究证实桃是 LTP 的主要致敏原,桃 LTP 的 IgE 水平是与非蔷薇科食物交叉反应(和临床过敏)相关的主要因素。LTP 过敏患者中常见临床意义不大的致敏现象,体内和/或体外检测阳性结果对检测潜在的临床反应者帮助不大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验