• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自适应认知测试是否兼具效率和精度?前瞻性研究结果。

Does adaptive cognitive testing combine efficiency with precision? Prospective findings.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;25(4):595-603. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-101743.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-2011-101743
PMID:21471648
Abstract

Longer cognitive tests, such as the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS-cog) or the Cambridge cognitive examination (CAMCOG), are more precise but less efficient than briefer tests, such as the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). We examined if computerized adaptive testing (CAT) of cognitive impairment can combine brevity with precision by tailoring a precise test to each individual patient. We conducted a prospective study of 84 participants [normal aging, n = 41; mild cognitive impairment (MCI), n = 21; dementia, n = 22]. CAT estimated a participant's ability during testing by selecting only items of appropriate difficulty from either the CAMCOG or the CAMCOG supplemented with ADAS-cog items and neuropsychological tests (the CAMCOG-Plus). After tailored testing with CAT, the remaining CAMCOG and CAMCOG-Plus items not selected by CAT were administered. The time needed to complete the CAT was compared to that needed for the whole CAMCOG and CAMCOG-Plus. Results showed that testing time reductions achieved with CAT were 37% or more compared to the whole CAMCOG and 55% or more compared to the whole CAMCOG-Plus. Estimated ability levels with CAT were in excellent agreement with those based on the whole CAMCOG and CAMCOG-Plus (intraclass correlations 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). Diagnostic accuracy of detecting mild dementia and MCI seemed better for the CAT administered tests than for the MMSE, but the differences were not significant. We conclude that adaptive testing combines brevity with precision, especially in grading the severity of cognitive impairment.

摘要

更长的认知测试,如阿尔茨海默病评估量表(ADAS-cog)或剑桥认知测验(CAMCOG),比简短的测试(如简易精神状态检查(MMSE))更精确但效率更低。我们研究了认知障碍的计算机自适应测试(CAT)是否可以通过为每个患者量身定制精确的测试来将简洁与精确相结合。我们对 84 名参与者进行了前瞻性研究[正常老化,n = 41;轻度认知障碍(MCI),n = 21;痴呆,n = 22]。CAT 通过从 CAMCOG 或 CAMCOG 中选择适当难度的项目,或从 CAMCOG 加上 ADAS-cog 项目和神经心理学测试(CAMCOG-Plus)中选择适当难度的项目,来评估参与者在测试期间的能力。经过 CAT 的针对性测试后,剩余的 CAT 未选择的 CAMCOG 和 CAMCOG-Plus 项目将进行管理。比较完成 CAT 所需的时间与完成整个 CAMCOG 和 CAMCOG-Plus 所需的时间。结果表明,与整个 CAMCOG 相比,CAT 可减少 37%或更多的测试时间,与整个 CAMCOG-Plus 相比,CAT 可减少 55%或更多的测试时间。CAT 估计的能力水平与基于整个 CAMCOG 和 CAMCOG-Plus 的能力水平非常一致(分别为 0.99 和 0.98 的组内相关系数)。与 MMSE 相比,CAT 管理的测试在检测轻度痴呆和 MCI 方面的诊断准确性似乎更好,但差异无统计学意义。我们的结论是,自适应测试将简洁与精确相结合,特别是在评估认知障碍的严重程度方面。

相似文献

1
Does adaptive cognitive testing combine efficiency with precision? Prospective findings.自适应认知测试是否兼具效率和精度?前瞻性研究结果。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;25(4):595-603. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-101743.
2
Adaptive cognitive testing in cerebrovascular disease and vascular dementia.脑血管病和血管性痴呆的适应性认知测试。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28(5):486-92. doi: 10.1159/000250593. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
3
Improving the accuracy and precision of cognitive testing in mild dementia.提高轻度痴呆症认知测试的准确性和精密度。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Mar;18(2):314-22. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001755. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
4
Adaptive cognitive testing in dementia.痴呆症中的适应性认知测试。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009 Jun;18(2):118-27. doi: 10.1002/mpr.283.
5
[Validation of the Hungarian version of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) in patients with mild cognitive impairment].[轻度认知障碍患者中阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知子量表(ADAS-Cog)匈牙利语版本的验证]
Psychiatr Hung. 2012;27(6):426-34.
6
Individualized evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitors effects in dementia with adaptive cognitive testing.通过适应性认知测试对痴呆症中胆碱酯酶抑制剂作用进行个体化评估。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Sep;25(3):190-8. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1484. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
Sensitivity and specificity of a briefer version of the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCog-Short) in the detection of cognitive decline in the elderly: An exploratory study.简短版剑桥认知功能测试(CAMCog-Short)在检测老年人认知功能衰退方面的敏感性和特异性:一项探索性研究。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 May;33(5):769-778. doi: 10.1002/gps.4857. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
8
Predictors of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment using the CAMCOG: a five-year follow-up.使用 CAMCOG 预测阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍的认知下降:一项为期五年的随访研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Jun;24(6):948-58. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211002158. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
Clinician and caregiver agreement on neuropsychiatric symptom severity: a study using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Clinician rating scale (NPI-C).临床医生与护理人员在神经精神症状严重程度上的一致性:一项使用神经精神科问卷临床评定量表(NPI-C)的研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Jul;26(7):1139-45. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000295. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
10
An investigation of the efficiency of the mini-Kingston standardized cognitive assessment-revised in classifying patients according to DSM-5 major and mild neurocognitive disorders due to possible Alzheimer's disease.探讨 mini-Kingston 标准化认知评估修订版在根据 DSM-5 可能的阿尔茨海默病所致主要和轻度神经认知障碍对患者进行分类方面的效率。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 May;27(5):785-91. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002919. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Can the Virtual Reality-Based Spatial Memory Test Better Discriminate Mild Cognitive Impairment than Neuropsychological Assessment?虚拟现实空间记忆测试是否比神经心理学评估能更好地区分轻度认知障碍?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;19(16):9950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169950.
2
Digital Cognitive Biomarker for Mild Cognitive Impairments and Dementia: A Systematic Review.轻度认知障碍和痴呆的数字认知生物标志物:一项系统综述。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 19;11(14):4191. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144191.
3
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog): Modifications and Responsiveness in Pre-Dementia Populations. A Narrative Review.
阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog):在痴呆前人群中的修改和反应性。一项叙述性综述。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(2):423-444. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170991.
4
Screening for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia with Automated, Anonymous Online and Telephone Cognitive Self-Tests.使用自动化、匿名的在线和电话认知自测筛查轻度认知障碍和痴呆症。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(1):249-259. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160566.
5
Individualized evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitors effects in dementia with adaptive cognitive testing.通过适应性认知测试对痴呆症中胆碱酯酶抑制剂作用进行个体化评估。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Sep;25(3):190-8. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1484. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Computerized cognitive testing for older adults: a review.老年人的计算机化认知测试:综述
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 Feb;30(1):13-28. doi: 10.1177/1533317514522852. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
7
Applications of technology in neuropsychological assessment.技术在神经心理学评估中的应用。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(8):1328-61. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.834971. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
8
Assessment of self-reported negative affect in the NIH Toolbox.评估 NIH 工具包中自我报告的负面情绪。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Mar 30;206(1):88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.034. Epub 2012 Oct 22.