• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

区分穿孔性阑尾炎与非穿孔性阑尾炎的临床因素:528例腹腔镜阑尾切除术的多排螺旋CT对比研究

Clinical factors for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: a comparison using multidetector computed tomography in 528 laparoscopic appendectomies.

作者信息

Suh Suk Won, Choi Yoo Shin, Park Joong Min, Kim Beom Gyu, Cha Seong Jae, Park Sung Jun, Chang In Taik

机构信息

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Apr;21(2):72-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820e762c.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820e762c
PMID:21471795
Abstract

The accurate and early diagnosis of perforated appendicitis (PA) is important when a surgeon is making decisions with regard to time and method of operation that are critical in reducing morbidity and mortality. A total of 528 laparoscopic appendectomies were investigated with the review of data. Clinical factors for identifying PA and a comparison using computed tomography (CT) (prominent role in detection of appendicitis despite of its high cost) were done. Among the clinical factors, total duration of the symptoms before admission (cutoff value: 24.51 h, sensitivity/specificity 0.51/0.65) and highly selective C-reactive protein levels (cutoff value: 9.52 mg/L, sensitivity/specificity 0.80/0.69) had significance on PA (P=0.001) compared with the performance of CT (sensitivity/specificity 0.28/0.99). The total duration of the symptoms before admission and highly selective C-reactive protein levels were respectable predictors of PA compared with those when using CT, showing that it could be another diagnostic tool for identifying PA.

摘要

对于外科医生而言,在决定关乎降低发病率和死亡率的手术时间及方法时,准确早期诊断穿孔性阑尾炎(PA)至关重要。通过回顾数据,对总共528例腹腔镜阑尾切除术进行了研究。分析了用于识别PA的临床因素,并与计算机断层扫描(CT)(尽管成本高昂,但在阑尾炎检测中发挥重要作用)进行了比较。在临床因素中,入院前症状的总持续时间(临界值:24.51小时,灵敏度/特异度0.51/0.65)和高选择性C反应蛋白水平(临界值:9.52mg/L,灵敏度/特异度0.80/0.69)与PA具有显著相关性(P = 0.001),与CT的表现(灵敏度/特异度0.28/0.99)相比。与使用CT时相比,入院前症状的总持续时间和高选择性C反应蛋白水平是PA的可靠预测指标,表明其可作为识别PA的另一种诊断工具。

相似文献

1
Clinical factors for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: a comparison using multidetector computed tomography in 528 laparoscopic appendectomies.区分穿孔性阑尾炎与非穿孔性阑尾炎的临床因素:528例腹腔镜阑尾切除术的多排螺旋CT对比研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Apr;21(2):72-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820e762c.
2
Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice?小儿单纯性及穿孔性阑尾炎的腹腔镜阑尾切除术:是首选术式吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Nov;35(11):1582-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.18319.
3
Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate?穿孔性阑尾炎:早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):731-7; discussion 737-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.053.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.
5
[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?].[腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:哪些因素影响手术技术的选择?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Feb;130(1):48-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-836240.
6
Simple way to improve accuracy in diagnosis of quadrant inflammatory disease: how to avoid adverse laparotomy by using plain CT.提高象限炎性疾病诊断准确性的简单方法:如何通过使用普通CT避免不必要的剖腹手术。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Jan-Feb;52(61):135-8.
7
[Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis--a comparative study].[开放性手术与腹腔镜手术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较研究]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Apr;130(2):137-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836411.
8
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].[腹腔镜或开放性阑尾切除术。文献综述与个人经验]
G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7.
9
Clinical factors influencing CT findings in patients with acute appendicitis.影响急性阑尾炎患者CT表现的临床因素。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1748-51.
10
Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis.高胆红素血症作为急性阑尾炎阑尾穿孔预测因素的诊断价值
Am J Surg. 2009 Aug;198(2):193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.026. Epub 2009 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive ability of CT findings in the differentiation of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a retrospective investigation of 201 patients undergone appendectomy at initial admission.CT表现对复杂性和非复杂性阑尾炎鉴别的预测能力:对201例初次入院时接受阑尾切除术患者的回顾性研究
Insights Imaging. 2021 Oct 21;12(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01086-3.
2
Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis by ultrasound imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.超声成像、计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像鉴别复杂与非复杂性阑尾炎:诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa030.
3
Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.
成人急性阑尾炎诊断的计算机断层扫描
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 19;2019(11):CD009977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009977.pub2.
4
Scoring system for differentiating perforated and non-perforated pediatric appendicitis.区分小儿穿孔性和非穿孔性阑尾炎的评分系统。
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Oct;24(5):547-554. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1535-1. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
5
Long-Term Results Following Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Adults.成人急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗后的长期结果
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2245-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3987-6.
6
Delta neutrophil index: A reliable marker to differentiate perforated appendicitis from non-perforated appendicitis in the elderly.δ中性粒细胞指数:区分老年人穿孔性阑尾炎与非穿孔性阑尾炎的可靠标志物。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22177. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
7
Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice.抗生素作为急性阑尾炎的一线治疗:临床实践改变的证据。
World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2028-36. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1641-x.