• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素作为急性阑尾炎的一线治疗:临床实践改变的证据。

Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 416 85 Goteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2028-36. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1641-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-012-1641-x
PMID:22569747
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies have indicated that acute appendicitis may be treated by antibiotics without the need of surgery. However, concerns have been raised about selection bias of patients in such studies. Therefore, the present study was aimed to validate previous findings in randomized studies by a full-scale population-based application.

METHODS

All patients with acute appendicitis at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (May 2009 and February 2010) were offered intravenous piperacillin plus tazobactam according to our previous experience, followed by 9 days out-hospital oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole. Endpoints were treatment efficacy and complications. Efficient antibiotic treatment was defined as recovery without the need of surgery beyond 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 558 consecutive patients were hospitalized and treated due to acute appendicitis. Seventy-nine percent (n = 442) received antibiotics as first-line therapy and 20 % (n = 111) had primary surgery as the second-line therapy. Seventy-seven percent of patients on primary antibiotics recovered while 23 % (n = 100) had subsequent appendectomy due to failed initial treatment on antibiotics. Thirty-eight patients (11 %) of the 342 had experienced recurrent appendicitis at 1-year follow-up. Primary antibiotic treatment had fewer complications compared to primary surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study confirms previous results of randomized studies. Antibiotic treatment can be offered as the first-line therapy to a majority of unselected patients with acute appendicitis without medical drawbacks other than the unknown risk for long-term relapse, which must be weighed against the unpredicted but well-known risk for serious major complications following surgical intervention.

摘要

背景

随机研究表明,急性阑尾炎可以通过抗生素治疗而无需手术。然而,人们对这些研究中患者的选择偏倚提出了担忧。因此,本研究旨在通过全面的基于人群的应用来验证先前随机研究的结果。

方法

根据我们之前的经验,所有在 Sahlgrenska 大学医院就诊的急性阑尾炎患者(2009 年 5 月至 2010 年 2 月)均给予静脉注射哌拉西林加他唑巴坦,然后在院外口服 9 天环丙沙星加甲硝唑。终点是治疗效果和并发症。有效的抗生素治疗定义为在 1 年随访期内无需手术即可恢复。

结果

共有 558 例连续患者因急性阑尾炎住院并接受治疗。79%(n = 442)接受抗生素作为一线治疗,20%(n = 111)作为二线治疗接受了初次手术。接受一线抗生素治疗的患者中有 77%恢复,而 23%(n = 100)因初始抗生素治疗失败而随后进行了阑尾切除术。在 1 年随访时,38 例(11%)患者出现复发性阑尾炎。与初次手术相比,一线抗生素治疗的并发症较少。

结论

这项基于人群的研究证实了先前随机研究的结果。对于大多数未经选择的急性阑尾炎患者,可以提供抗生素治疗作为一线治疗,除了长期复发的未知风险外,没有其他医疗弊端,必须权衡手术干预后不可预测但众所周知的严重主要并发症的风险。

相似文献

1
Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice.抗生素作为急性阑尾炎的一线治疗:临床实践改变的证据。
World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2028-36. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1641-x.
2
Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice.抗生素作为急性阑尾炎的一线治疗方法:临床实践改变的证据
World J Surg. 2012 Sep;36(9):2037-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1647-4.
3
Pharmacoeconomics of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole vs. piperacillin-tazobactam for complicated intra-abdominal infections.环丙沙星联合甲硝唑与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的药物经济学
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Jun;9(3):325-33. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.010.
4
Antibiotics as first-line therapy for acute appendicitis: evidence for a change in clinical practice.抗生素作为急性阑尾炎的一线治疗方法:临床实践改变的证据
World J Surg. 2012 Dec;36(12):2952-3. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1738-2.
5
Comparison of intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections.静脉注射/口服环丙沙星联合甲硝唑与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的比较
Ann Surg. 2000 Aug;232(2):254-62. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00016.
6
Piperacillin/Tazobactam versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole for treatment of children with intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢噻肟加甲硝唑治疗需手术的儿童腹腔内感染
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Sep;20(9):643-6. doi: 10.1007/s100960100581.
7
Effect of Oral Moxifloxacin vs Intravenous Ertapenem Plus Oral Levofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.口服莫西沙星对比静脉注射厄他培南加口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的效果:APPAC II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):353-362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23525.
8
Three-Year Outcomes of Oral Antibiotics vs Intravenous and Oral Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Secondary Analysis of the APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.口服抗生素与静脉和口服抗生素治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的 3 年结局:APPAC II 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jul 1;159(7):727-735. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5947.
9
Mean (standard deviation) or mean (standard error of mean): time to ponder.均值(标准差)或均值(均值标准误):有待思考。
World J Surg. 2013 Apr;37(4):932. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1854-z.
10
[Controlled, open, parallel-group study of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam versus metronidazole + gentamicin in urgent colorectal surgery].哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与甲硝唑+庆大霉素在急诊结直肠手术中临床及微生物学疗效的对照、开放、平行组研究
Cir Esp. 2006 Jun;79(6):365-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-739x(06)70892-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidental Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumor Post Appendectomy: Surgery Is Here to Stay.阑尾切除术后偶然发现的阑尾神经内分泌肿瘤:手术仍将继续应用。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 7;17(2):e78700. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78700. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
The Effect of Preoperative Imaging on the Negative Appendicectomy Rate.术前影像学检查对阴性阑尾切除术率的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 13;15(7):e41809. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41809. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
COVID-19-associated acute appendicitis in adults. A report of five cases and a review of the literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis.各种 CT 征象对急性阑尾炎的诊断价值。
Clin Imaging. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.04.003.
2
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD008359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2.
3
Antibiotics versus appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis: a review of the current evidence.抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的比较:当前证据综述。
成人新型冠状病毒肺炎相关急性阑尾炎。5例报告及文献复习
Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jun 1;24(1):482. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11409. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Management of Acute Appendicitis during COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.在三级保健中心 COVID-19 大流行期间急性阑尾炎的管理:一项描述性横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Mar 31;59(235):252-255. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6307.
5
The Study on Molecular Profile Changes of Pathogens via Zinc Nanocomposites Immobilization Approach.基于锌纳米复合材料固定化方法的病原体分子谱变化研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 20;22(10):5395. doi: 10.3390/ijms22105395.
6
Accuracy of ultrasonography for differentiating between simple and complex appendicitis in children.超声检查对儿童单纯性与复杂性阑尾炎的诊断准确性。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Jul;37(7):843-849. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-04872-8. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
7
Nonoperative Antibiotic Treatment of Appendicitis in Adults: A Survey among Clinically Active Surgeons.成人阑尾炎的非手术抗生素治疗:对临床活跃外科医生的一项调查
Visc Med. 2020 Dec;36(6):494-500. doi: 10.1159/000506058. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Successful Conservative Management of Acute Appendicitis in a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patient.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者急性阑尾炎的成功保守治疗
Cureus. 2020 Apr 26;12(4):e7834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7834.
9
Parental preferences in treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis comparing surgery to conservative management with antibiotics and their views on research participation.父母在急性单纯性阑尾炎治疗中的偏好,比较手术与抗生素保守治疗及其对研究参与的看法。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 May;179(5):735-742. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03555-w. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
10
Meta-analysis of studies comparing conservative treatment with antibiotics and appendectomy for acute appendicitis in the adult.比较成人急性阑尾炎保守抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术的研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0578-5.
Can J Surg. 2011 Oct;54(5):307-14. doi: 10.1503/cjs.006610.
4
Causes of short-term mortality after appendectomy: a population-based case-controlled study.阑尾切除术后短期死亡的原因:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Ann Surg. 2011 Jul;254(1):103-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821ad9c4.
5
Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: effect of delay is confounded by age and gender.穿孔性阑尾炎的特征:延误对年龄和性别有影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jul;15(7):1223-31. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1486-x. Epub 2011 May 10.
6
Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.阿莫西林克拉维酸与阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的疗效比较:一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2011 May 7;377(9777):1573-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60410-8.
7
The impact of postoperative abscess formation in perforated appendicitis.术后脓肿形成对穿孔性阑尾炎的影响。
J Surg Res. 2011 Sep;170(1):24-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.03.038. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
8
Surgery versus conservative antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.手术与保守抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(3):210-21. doi: 10.1159/000324595. Epub 2011 May 3.
9
Is it safe? Appendectomies at night at a low-volume center.夜间在低容量中心进行阑尾切除术是否安全?
J Surg Educ. 2011 May-Jun;68(3):199-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.12.001. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
10
Clinical factors for distinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: a comparison using multidetector computed tomography in 528 laparoscopic appendectomies.区分穿孔性阑尾炎与非穿孔性阑尾炎的临床因素:528例腹腔镜阑尾切除术的多排螺旋CT对比研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Apr;21(2):72-5. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820e762c.