• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geographic variation of racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer testing among medicare enrollees.医疗保险参保人群中结直肠癌检测的种族/民族差异的地域差异。
Cancer. 2011 Apr 15;117(8):1755-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25668. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
2
Persistent racial and ethnic disparities in up-to-date colorectal cancer testing in medicare enrollees.医疗保险参保者在最新结直肠癌检测方面持续存在种族和族裔差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar;57(3):412-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02143.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
3
What Happened to Disparities in CRC Screening Among FFS Medicare Enrollees Following Medicare Modernization?医疗保险现代化后,传统医疗保险计划中老年参保者的 CRC 筛查差异情况如何?
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2019 Apr;6(2):273-291. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-0522-x. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
4
Trends in colorectal cancer testing among Medicare subpopulations.医疗保险亚人群中结直肠癌检测的趋势。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Sep;35(3):194-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.029. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening persisted despite expansion of Medicare's screening reimbursement.尽管医疗保险扩大了筛查报销范围,但结直肠癌筛查仍存在种族和民族差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 May;20(5):811-7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0963.
6
Understanding current racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States: the contribution of socioeconomic status and access to care.了解美国当前在结直肠癌筛查方面的种族/民族差异:社会经济地位和获得医疗保健的贡献。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.023.
7
Socioeconomic and racial patterns of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees in 2000 to 2005.2000年至2005年医疗保险参保者中结直肠癌筛查的社会经济和种族模式。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Aug;18(8):2170-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0104. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
8
Trends in Sociodemographic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Staging and Survival: A SEER-Medicare Analysis.结直肠癌分期及生存的社会人口学差异趋势:一项监测、流行病学及最终结果(SEER)与医疗保险分析
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;11(3):e00155. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000155.
9
Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.结肠镜检查医师和初级保健医生的供应情况以及结直肠癌筛查中的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1137-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01355.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Meeting MTM Eligibility Criteria Based on Star Ratings Compared with the Medicare Modernization Act.基于星级评定与《医疗保险现代化法案》相比,在符合 MTM 资格标准方面的种族和民族差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Feb;24(2):97-107. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.2.97.

引用本文的文献

1
National and subnational incidence, mortality and associated factors of colorectal cancer in China: A systematic analysis and modelling study.中国结直肠癌的国家和省级发病率、死亡率及其相关因素:系统分析和建模研究。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 13;13:04096. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04096.
2
Regional variation in healthcare usage for Medicare beneficiaries: a cross-sectional study based on the health and retirement study.医疗保险受益人的医疗保健使用的地区差异:基于健康与退休研究的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 26;12(8):e061375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061375.
3
Impact of COVID-19 on cervical cancer screening: Challenges and opportunities to improving resilience and reduce disparities.新冠疫情对宫颈癌筛查的影响:提高韧性和减少差异的挑战与机遇。
Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106596. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106596. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Epidemiological Determinants of Advanced Prostate Cancer in Elderly Men in the United States.美国老年男性晚期前列腺癌的流行病学决定因素
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2019 Jun 26;13:1179554919855116. doi: 10.1177/1179554919855116. eCollection 2019.
5
National racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in experiences with health care among adult Medicaid beneficiaries.美国成年医疗补助受益人群在医疗保健方面的经历存在国家种族/民族和地域差异。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):287-296. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13106. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
6
Practice Pattern Variation in the Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography for Open Valve Cardiac Surgery.经食管超声心动图在心脏直视瓣膜手术中的应用模式差异
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Jan;33(1):118-133. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.07.040. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
7
Geographic Region Matters in the Relation Between Perceived Racial Discrimination and Psychiatric Disorders Among Black Older Adults.地理区域在黑老年群体感知种族歧视与精神障碍的关系中起作用。
Gerontologist. 2017 Nov 10;57(6):1142-1147. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw129.
8
Case-control study of candidate gene methylation and adenomatous polyp formation.候选基因甲基化与腺瘤性息肉形成的病例对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Feb;32(2):183-192. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2688-1. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
9
Assessing Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence of Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Age 76 to 95 Years.评估年龄在76至95岁之间的医疗保险按服务收费受益人的结直肠癌筛查依从性。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):e670-80. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.009118. Epub 2016 May 17.
10
Diabetes Status and Being Up-to-Date on Colorectal Cancer Screening, 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.糖尿病状况与结直肠癌筛查最新情况,2012年行为危险因素监测系统
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Feb 4;13:E19. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150391.

本文引用的文献

1
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.单次乙状结肠镜筛查预防结直肠癌:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2010 May 8;375(9726):1624-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
2
Understanding observed and unobserved health care access and utilization disparities among US Latino adults.了解美国拉丁裔成年人在医疗保健可及性和使用方面已观察到的和未观察到的差异。
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Oct;66(5):561-77. doi: 10.1177/1077558709338487. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
3
Racial clustering and access to colorectal surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiation oncologists by African Americans and Asian Americans in the United States: a county-level data analysis.美国非裔美国人和亚裔美国人的种族聚集情况以及他们获得结直肠外科医生、胃肠病学家和放射肿瘤学家服务的情况:县级数据分析
Arch Surg. 2009 Jun;144(6):532-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.68.
4
Cancer statistics, 2009.2009年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.
5
Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the medicare population, 1998-2005.1998 - 2005年医疗保险人群中结直肠癌检测的使用趋势
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Jul;37(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 May 7.
6
Persistent racial and ethnic disparities in up-to-date colorectal cancer testing in medicare enrollees.医疗保险参保者在最新结直肠癌检测方面持续存在种族和族裔差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Mar;57(3):412-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02143.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
7
Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查与结直肠癌死亡的关联。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jan 6;150(1):1-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
8
Geographic variation and effect of area-level poverty rate on colorectal cancer screening.地区差异及地区贫困率对结直肠癌筛查的影响
BMC Public Health. 2008 Oct 16;8:358. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-358.
9
Determinants of racial/ethnic colorectal cancer screening disparities.种族/族裔结直肠癌筛查差异的决定因素。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jun 23;168(12):1317-24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.12.1317.
10
Factors associated with Hispanic/non-Hispanic white colorectal cancer screening disparities.与西班牙裔/非西班牙裔白种人结直肠癌筛查差异相关的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug;23(8):1241-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0666-1. Epub 2008 May 24.

医疗保险参保人群中结直肠癌检测的种族/民族差异的地域差异。

Geographic variation of racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer testing among medicare enrollees.

机构信息

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis Sacramento, California 95817, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2011 Apr 15;117(8):1755-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25668. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.25668
PMID:21472723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4570926/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Medicare population has documented racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but it is unknown whether these disparities differ across geographic regions.

METHODS

Among Medicare enrollees within 8 US states, we ascertained up-to-date CRC screening on December 31, 2003 (fecal occult blood testing in the prior year or sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the prior 5 years). Logistic regression models tested for regional variation in up-to-date status among white versus different nonwhite populations (blacks, Asian/Pacific Islanders [APIs], Hispanics). We estimated regression-adjusted region-specific prevalence of up-to-date status by race/ethnicity and compared adjusted white versus nonwhite up-to-date prevalence across regions by using generalized least squares regression.

RESULTS

White versus nonwhite up-to-date status varied significantly across regions for blacks (P = .01) and APIs (P < .001) but not Hispanics (P = .62). Whereas the white versus black differences in proportion up-to-date were greatest in Atlanta (Georgia), rural Georgia, and the San Francisco Bay Area of California (range, 10%-16% differences, blacks<whites); there were no significant white versus black differences in Connecticut, Seattle (Washington) or Iowa. Whereas APIs had significantly lower up-to-date prevalence than whites in Michigan and the California regions of San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Jose (range, 4%-15% differences, APIs<whites), APIs in Hawaii had higher up-to-date status than whites (52% vs 38% P < .001). White versus Hispanic differences were substantial but homogeneous across regions (range, 8%-16% differences, Hispanics<whites). In contrast to nonwhites, there was little geographic variation in up-to-date status among whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant geographic variation in up-to-date status among black and API Medicare enrollees is associated with heterogeneous racial/ethnic disparities for these groups across US regions.

摘要

背景

医疗保险人群的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查存在种族/民族差异,但尚不清楚这些差异是否因地域不同而有所不同。

方法

在 8 个美国州的医疗保险参保者中,我们确定了截至 2003 年 12 月 31 日的最新 CRC 筛查情况(前一年的粪便潜血检测或前 5 年的乙状结肠镜或结肠镜检查)。逻辑回归模型测试了白人与不同非白人人群(黑人、亚太裔[API]、西班牙裔)在最新状态方面的区域差异。我们根据种族/族裔估计了调整后的区域特定最新状态的流行率,并通过广义最小二乘回归比较了各区域调整后白人与非白人的最新流行率。

结果

对于黑人(P =.01)和亚太裔(P <.001),白人与非白人的最新状态在各区域之间存在显著差异,但对于西班牙裔(P =.62)则不然。在亚特兰大(佐治亚州)、乔治亚州农村地区和加利福尼亚州旧金山湾区,白人与黑人之间在最新状态比例上的差异最大(范围为 10%-16%,黑人<白人);在康涅狄格州、西雅图(华盛顿州)或爱荷华州,不存在显著的白人与黑人之间的差异。在密歇根州和旧金山、洛杉矶和圣何塞的加利福尼亚地区,亚太裔的最新筛查率明显低于白人(范围为 4%-15%,亚太裔<白人),而在夏威夷州,亚太裔的最新筛查率则高于白人(52%对 38%,P <.001)。白人与西班牙裔之间的差异很大,但在各区域内是同质的(范围为 8%-16%,西班牙裔<白人)。与非白人不同,白人的最新状态在各区域之间几乎没有地理差异。

结论

医疗保险参保的黑人和亚太裔在最新状态方面存在显著的地域差异,这与美国各地区这些群体的种族/民族差异有关。