Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2011 Aug;38(4):404-11. doi: 10.1177/1090198110380544. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
Only a few of the interventions that target blue-collar workers have conducted formal analysis to evaluate the specific attributes of their intervention that are associated with success or failure. This study examined the role of dual hazard and decisional balance in the MassBUILT smoking cessation intervention. The authors conducted sets of multivariable linear and logistic regressions that examined if (a) the intervention was associated with changes in the psychosocial variables and (b) increase in psychosocial variables was associated with increase in smoking cessation. As hypothesized by the theoretical basis of the study, higher scores on both of the psychosocial variables were significantly associated with smoking cessation. However, the intervention did not change decisional balance and decreased dual hazard. The variables examined were important but were not mediators of the MassBUILT intervention and this could have contributed to the significant relapse in smoking among study participants.
只有少数针对蓝领工人的干预措施进行了正式分析,以评估与其成功或失败相关的干预措施的具体属性。本研究考察了双重危害和决策平衡在 MassBUILT 戒烟干预中的作用。作者进行了一系列多变量线性和逻辑回归分析,以检验干预是否与心理社会变量的变化相关,以及(b)心理社会变量的增加是否与戒烟的增加相关。正如该研究理论基础所假设的那样,这两个心理社会变量的得分较高与戒烟显著相关。然而,干预并没有改变决策平衡,反而降低了双重危害。研究中检查的变量很重要,但不是 MassBUILT 干预的中介变量,这可能导致研究参与者的吸烟显著反弹。