Suppr超能文献

采用手术或非手术方法治疗胸大肌断裂后的等速肌力评估。

Isokinetic muscle assessment after treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture using surgical or non-surgical procedures.

机构信息

Departamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(2):313-20. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000200022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle appears to be increasing in athletes. However, the optimal treatment strategy has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the isokinetic shoulder performance after surgical treatment to that after non-surgical treatment for pectoralis major muscle rupture.

METHODS

We assessed 33 pectoralis major muscle ruptures (18 treated non-surgically and 15 treated surgically). Horizontal abduction and adduction as well as external and internal rotation at 60 and 120 degrees/s were tested in both upper limbs. Peak torque, total work, contralateral deficiency, and the peak torque agonist-to-antagonist ratio were measured.

RESULTS

Contralateral muscular deficiency did not differ between the surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities. However, the surgical group presented twice the number of athletes with clinically acceptable contralateral deficiency (<20%) for internal rotators compared to the non-surgical group. The peak torque ratio between the external and internal rotator muscles revealed a similar deficit of the external rotation in both groups and on both sides (surgical, 61.60% and 57.80% and non-surgical, 62.06% and 54.06%, for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively). The peak torque ratio revealed that the horizontal adduction muscles on the injured side showed similar weakness in both groups (surgical, 86.27%; non-surgical, 98.61%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study included the largest single series of athletes reported to date for this type of injury. A comparative analysis of muscular strength and balance showed no differences between the treatment modalities for pectoralis major muscle rupture. However, the number of significant clinical deficiencies was lower in the surgical group than in the non-surgical group, and both treatment modalities require greater attention to the rehabilitation process, especially for the recovery of muscle strength and balance.

摘要

简介

胸大肌撕裂在运动员中似乎越来越常见。然而,最佳的治疗策略尚未确立。

目的

比较胸大肌撕裂的手术治疗与非手术治疗后的等速肩关节性能。

方法

我们评估了 33 例胸大肌撕裂(18 例非手术治疗,15 例手术治疗)。在双侧上肢测试水平外展和内收以及外旋和内旋,角速度为 60°/s 和 120°/s。测量峰值扭矩、总功、对侧肌肉不足以及峰值扭矩的优势肌与拮抗肌比值。

结果

手术组和非手术组之间对侧肌肉不足没有差异。然而,与非手术组相比,手术组有两倍的运动员出现可接受的内旋肌对侧不足(<20%)。外旋肌和内旋肌之间的峰值扭矩比值显示,两组双侧的外旋肌均存在相似的缺陷(手术组分别为 61.60%和 57.80%,非手术组分别为 62.06%和 54.06%)。峰值扭矩比值显示,受伤侧的水平内收肌在两组中均表现出相似的无力(手术组为 86.27%;非手术组为 98.61%)。

结论

本研究包括了迄今为止此类损伤报道的最大的运动员单一系列。对肌肉力量和平衡的比较分析显示,胸大肌撕裂的两种治疗方法之间没有差异。然而,手术组的显著临床不足的数量低于非手术组,两种治疗方法都需要更加注意康复过程,尤其是肌肉力量和平衡的恢复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d54/3059863/ef951e1db89a/cln-66-02-313-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验