Jacobs Collin, Jacobs-Müller Claudia, Luley Carolin, Erbe Christina, Wehrbein Heiner
Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2011 Mar;72(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-0007-y. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
The aim of the study was an analysis of effects and side-effects during mesialization of second molars after extraction of the first permanent molars using the anterior dentition/premolars (PM) as an anchorage unit.
A total of 35 patients were examined retrospectively who had undergone unilateral or bilateral first permanent molar extraction in the upper or lower arch due to carious lesions. Space closure was carried out in all cases through mesialization of the second molar using an elastic chain fixed to an edgewise stainless steel archwire and tying the anterior dentition/PM together with a continuous laceback ligature. Tooth movement was assessed from lateral cephalograms, orthopantomograms (OPGs) and images of the patient's study casts taken before and after the end of therapy.
Space closure after first molar extractions by mesialization of the second molars without skeletal anchorage was largely achieved by bodily forward movement of the teeth, including a small tipping component or tooth-uprighting component when molars were already mesially inclined. Unilateral and bilateral mesialization of the second molars led to retrusion in the maxilla and mandible [(∆incl.=-3.6° (max., bil.), ∆incl.=-4.2° (mand., bil.)] and to translational retraction [(∆s=-2.3 mm (max., bil.), ∆s=-1.6 mm (mand., bil.)] of the incisors. Examination of the soft tissues revealed an increased posterior displacement of the upper and lower lips to the esthetic line [(∆s=-2.8 mm (max. bil.), ∆s=-2.2 mm (mand., bil.)]. In cases of unilateral mesialization less than 50% of the patients had a slight midline deviation in the mandible towards the extraction side.
Side effects during mesialization of the second molars without skeletal anchorage in the anterior dentition/PM were observed primarily affecting the incisors integrated into the anterior anchorage unit. These side-effects resulted in posterior displacement of the soft tissues, including a change in profile. This must be taken into consideration when taking this therapeutic approach.
本研究旨在分析在拔除第一恒磨牙后,以前牙列/前磨牙(PM)作为支抗单位,使第二磨牙近中移动过程中的效果和副作用。
回顾性检查了35例因龋损在上颌或下颌牙弓进行单侧或双侧第一恒磨牙拔除的患者。所有病例均通过使用固定在方丝不锈钢弓丝上的弹力链使第二磨牙近中移动来关闭间隙,并通过连续回扎结扎将前牙列/前磨牙绑在一起。从治疗前后拍摄的头颅侧位片、全景曲面断层片(OPG)以及患者研究模型的图像评估牙齿移动情况。
在没有骨支抗的情况下,通过第二磨牙近中移动关闭第一磨牙拔除后的间隙,主要是通过牙齿整体向前移动实现的,当磨牙已经近中倾斜时,还包括小的倾斜分量或牙齿直立分量。第二磨牙的单侧和双侧近中移动导致上颌和下颌后缩[(倾斜度变化=-3.6°(上颌,双侧),倾斜度变化=-4.2°(下颌,双侧)]以及切牙的平移后缩[(位移=-2.3 mm(上颌,双侧),位移=-1.6 mm(下颌,双侧)]。软组织检查显示上、下唇向后移位至美学线的距离增加[(位移=-2.8 mm(上颌,双侧),位移=-2.2 mm(下颌,双侧)]。在单侧近中移动的病例中,不到50%的患者下颌中线向拔牙侧有轻微偏移。
观察到在前牙列/前磨牙中无骨支抗使第二磨牙近中移动期间的副作用主要影响整合到前支抗单位中的切牙。这些副作用导致软组织向后移位,包括面部轮廓的改变。采用这种治疗方法时必须考虑到这一点。