• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病理性赌博扑克玩家的概率估计和决策能力受损。

Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players.

机构信息

Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Nørrebrogade 44, Building 10G, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2012 Mar;28(1):113-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9244-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-011-9244-2
PMID:21484601
Abstract

Poker has gained tremendous popularity in recent years, increasing the risk for some individuals to develop pathological gambling. Here, we investigated cognitive biases in a computerized two-player poker task against a fictive opponent, among 12 pathological gambling poker players (PGP), 10 experienced poker players (ExP), and 11 inexperienced poker players (InP). Players were compared on probability estimation and decision-making with the hypothesis that ExP would have significantly lower cognitive biases than PGP and InP, and that the groups could be differentiated based on their cognitive bias styles. The results showed that ExP had a significantly lower average error margin in probability estimation than PGP and InP, and that PGP played hands with lower winning probability than ExP. Binomial logistic regression showed perfect differentiation (100%) between ExP and PGP, and 90.5% classification accuracy between ExP and InP. Multinomial logistic regression showed an overall classification accuracy of 23 out of 33 (69.7%) between the three groups. The classification accuracy of ExP was higher than that of PGP and InP due to the similarities in probability estimation and decision-making between PGP and InP. These impairments in probability estimation and decision-making of PGP may have implications for assessment and treatment of cognitive biases in pathological gambling poker players.

摘要

近年来,扑克游戏的风靡,增加了一些人发展为病理性赌博的风险。在这里,我们在一个计算机化的两人扑克任务中,针对一个虚构的对手,调查了 12 名病理性赌博扑克玩家(PGP)、10 名经验丰富的扑克玩家(ExP)和 11 名缺乏经验的扑克玩家(InP)的认知偏差。我们假设 ExP 会比 PGP 和 InP 具有显著更低的认知偏差,并根据他们的认知偏差风格将这些群体区分开来,对玩家的概率估计和决策进行了比较。结果表明,ExP 在概率估计上的平均误差幅度明显低于 PGP 和 InP,而 PGP 打出的牌的获胜概率低于 ExP。二项逻辑回归显示,ExP 和 PGP 之间的区分度达到了 100%(100%),而 ExP 和 InP 之间的分类准确率为 90.5%。多项逻辑回归显示,三组之间的整体分类准确率为 23 比 33(69.7%)。由于 PGP 和 InP 在概率估计和决策方面的相似性,ExP 的分类准确率高于 PGP 和 InP。PGP 在概率估计和决策方面的这些缺陷可能对病理性赌博扑克玩家的认知偏差的评估和治疗具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Impaired probability estimation and decision-making in pathological gambling poker players.病理性赌博扑克玩家的概率估计和决策能力受损。
J Gambl Stud. 2012 Mar;28(1):113-22. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9244-2.
2
Gambling Problem Trajectories and Associated Individuals Risk Factors: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study Among Poker Players.赌博问题轨迹及相关个体风险因素:一项为期三年的扑克玩家随访研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Mar;36(1):355-371. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09831-6.
3
Social and psychological challenges of poker.扑克的社会和心理挑战。
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Sep;26(3):401-20. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9168-2.
4
Are poker players all the same? Latent class analysis.扑克玩家都一样吗?潜在类别分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Jun;31(2):441-54. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9429-y.
5
Emotional and Social Factors influence Poker Decision Making Accuracy.情感和社会因素会影响扑克决策的准确性。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):933-47. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9454-5.
6
Anxiety, Depression and Emotion Regulation Among Regular Online Poker Players.经常在线玩扑克玩家中的焦虑、抑郁与情绪调节
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Dec;33(4):1039-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9669-3.
7
Neural correlates of the impact of prior outcomes on subsequent monetary decision-making in frequent poker players.频繁玩扑克牌者先前结果对后续金钱决策影响的神经关联
Biol Psychol. 2017 Mar;124:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
One-Year Prospective Study on Passion and Gambling Problems in Poker Players.一项关于扑克玩家激情和赌博问题的为期一年的前瞻性研究。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):379-391. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9706-2.
9
Connection Between Poker Playing and Problem Gambling with Sociodemographic Factors and Other Gambling Activities.打扑克与赌博问题的关系:社会人口因素及其他赌博活动的影响。
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Jun;36(2):421-433. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09920-6.
10
The Psychology of Esports: A Systematic Literature Review.电子竞技心理学:系统文献综述。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):351-365. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9763-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher Risk Taking and Impaired Probability Judgment in Behavioral Addiction.行为成瘾者风险承受能力更高,概率判断能力受损。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Dec 10;23(10):662-672. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa044.
2
Outcome expectancy and suboptimal risky choice in nonhuman primates.非人类灵长类动物的结果预期与次优风险选择。
Learn Behav. 2020 Sep;48(3):301-321. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00406-4.
3
The gambler's fallacy in problem and non-problem gamblers.赌徒谬误在问题赌徒和非问题赌徒中的体现。

本文引用的文献

1
Inverse association between dopaminergic neurotransmission and Iowa Gambling Task performance in pathological gamblers and healthy controls.在病理性赌博者和健康对照组中,多巴胺能神经传递与爱荷华赌博任务表现呈负相关。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Feb;52(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00837.x.
2
How do gamblers start gambling: identifying behavioural markers for high-risk internet gambling.赌徒如何开始赌博:识别高危网络赌博的行为标记。
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Apr;22(2):273-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp232. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
3
Examining DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling: psychometric properties and evidence from cognitive biases.
J Behav Addict. 2019 Dec 1;8(4):754-769. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.66. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Internet Use Influences Self-Related Process: Evidence From Behavior and ERPs.互联网使用影响自我相关过程:来自行为和事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2597. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02597. eCollection 2018.
5
Gambling in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): The effect of cues signaling risky choice outcomes.恒河猴(猕猴)的赌博行为:提示信号对风险选择结果的影响。
Learn Behav. 2017 Sep;45(3):288-299. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0270-5.
6
Internet Gamblers Differ on Social Variables: A Latent Class Analysis.网民在社会变量上存在差异:潜在类别分析。
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Sep;33(3):881-897. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9664-0.
7
Metacognition in Pathological Gambling and Its Relationship with Anxious and Depressive Symptomatology.病态赌博中的元认知及其与焦虑和抑郁症状学的关系。
J Gambl Stud. 2016 Jun;32(2):675-88. doi: 10.1007/s10899-015-9552-z.
8
Development and Validation of the Poker Skills Measure (PSM).扑克技能测量工具(PSM)的开发与验证
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):849-66. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9475-0.
9
Cognitive biases toward Internet game-related pictures and executive deficits in individuals with an Internet game addiction.网络成瘾个体对网络相关游戏图片的认知偏差与执行功能缺陷
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048961. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
10
Losing more by losing it: poker experience, sensitivity to losses and tilting severity.输得越多,损失越大:扑克经验、对损失的敏感性和倾斜严重程度。
J Gambl Stud. 2014 Mar;30(1):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9339-4.
审视《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》中病理性赌博的标准:心理测量特性及认知偏差方面的证据
J Gambl Stud. 2007 Dec;23(4):479-98. doi: 10.1007/s10899-007-9063-7. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
4
Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers.病态赌徒对延迟折扣的情境控制
J Appl Behav Anal. 2006 Winter;39(4):413-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2006.173-05.
5
Frequent card playing and pathological gambling: the utility of the Georgia Gambling Task and Iowa Gambling Task for predicting pathology.频繁打牌和病理性赌博:乔治亚赌博任务和爱荷华赌博任务在预测病理学方面的效用。
J Gambl Stud. 2007 Sep;23(3):285-97. doi: 10.1007/s10899-006-9034-4.
6
Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls.病态赌博中的神经认知功能:与酒精依赖、妥瑞氏综合征及正常对照的比较。
Addiction. 2006 Apr;101(4):534-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01380.x.
7
Episodic chasing in pathological gamblers using the Iowa gambling task.使用爱荷华赌博任务对病态赌徒的发作性追逐行为进行研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2006 Feb;47(1):43-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00491.x.
8
The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling.感知控制和过度自信在病态赌博中的作用。
J Gambl Stud. 2005 Winter;21(4):481-502. doi: 10.1007/s10899-005-5559-1.
9
Decision making in pathological gambling: a comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls.病态赌博中的决策:病态赌徒、酒精依赖者、妥瑞氏症患者与正常对照组的比较
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Apr;23(1):137-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.017.
10
Gambling: the hidden addiction.赌博:隐藏的成瘾行为。
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;49(8):501-3. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900801.