Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎的缓解能否在不进行实验室检查或正式关节计数的情况下进行评估?基于自我报告的 RAPID3 评分和 ESPOIR 队列中仔细的关节检查的可能缓解标准。

Can remission in rheumatoid arthritis be assessed without laboratory tests or a formal joint count? possible remission criteria based on a self-report RAPID3 score and careful joint examination in the ESPOIR cohort.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2013 Apr;40(4):386-93. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121059. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore 5 possible criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) based on a patient self-report index, the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3), with a careful joint examination and possible physician global estimate (DOCGL), but without a formal joint count or laboratory test.

METHODS

The ESPOIR early RA cohort of 813 French patients recruited in 2002-2005 was analyzed to identify patients in remission 6 months after enrollment, according to 2 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria: Boolean ≤ 1 for total tender joint count-28, swollen joint count-28, C-reactive protein, and patient global estimate (PATGL), and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤ 3.3. Agreement with 7 other remission criteria was analyzed - Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) ≤ 2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 2.8, and 5 candidate criteria based on RAPID3, joint examination, and DOCGL: "RAPID3R" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0); "RAPID3R+SJ1" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, ≤ 1 swollen joint); "RAPID3R+SJ1+D1" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, ≤ 1 swollen joint, DOCGL ≤ 1); "RAPID3R+SJ0" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, 0 swollen joints); and "RAPID3R+SJ0+D1" (RAPID3 ≤ 3.0, 0 swollen joints, DOCGL ≤ 1), according to kappa statistics, sensitivity, and specificity. Residual global, articular, and questionnaire abnormalities according to each criteria set were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 813 ESPOIR patients, 720 had complete data to compare all 9 possible criteria. Substantial agreement with the Boolean criteria was seen for SDAI, CDAI, RAPID3R+SJ1, RAPID3R+SJ1+D1, RAPID3R+SJ0, and RAPID3R+SJ0+D1 (92.2%-94.7%, kappa 0.67-0.79), versus only moderate agreement for DAS28 or RAPID3R (79.9%-85.8%, kappa 0.46-0.55).

CONCLUSION

Remission according to CDAI and RAPID3R+SJ1, but not DAS28 or RAPID3R, is similar to that of the ACR/EULAR criteria. RAPID3 scores require a complementary careful joint examination for clinical decisions, do not preclude formal joint counts or other indices, and may be useful in busy clinical settings.

摘要

目的

基于患者自评指数常规评估患者数据(RAPID3),结合仔细的关节检查和可能的医生总体评估(DOCGL),但不进行正式的关节计数或实验室检查,探索类风湿关节炎(RA)缓解的 5 种可能标准。

方法

分析了 2002-2005 年招募的 813 名法国早期 RA 患者的 ESPOIR 队列,根据 2 项美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(ACR/EULAR)标准确定 6 个月时缓解的患者:总压痛关节计数-28、肿胀关节计数-28、C 反应蛋白和患者总体评估(PATGL)的布尔值≤1,简化疾病活动指数(SDAI)≤3.3。分析了与 7 种其他缓解标准的一致性,包括疾病活动评分-28(DAS28)≤2.6、临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)≤2.8,以及基于 RAPID3、关节检查和 DOCGL 的 5 个候选标准:“RAPID3R”(RAPID3≤3.0);“RAPID3R+SJ1”(RAPID3≤3.0,≤1 个肿胀关节);“RAPID3R+SJ1+D1”(RAPID3≤3.0,≤1 个肿胀关节,DOCGL≤1);“RAPID3R+SJ0”(RAPID3≤3.0,0 个肿胀关节);以及“RAPID3R+SJ0+D1”(RAPID3≤3.0,0 个肿胀关节,DOCGL≤1),根据 κ 统计、敏感性和特异性进行分析。分析了每个标准集的残余整体、关节和问卷异常。

结果

在 813 名 ESPOIR 患者中,有 720 名患者具有完整数据,可以比较所有 9 种可能的标准。SDAI、CDAI、RAPID3R+SJ1、RAPID3R+SJ1+D1、RAPID3R+SJ0 和 RAPID3R+SJ0+D1 与布尔标准具有显著一致性(92.2%-94.7%,κ 值 0.67-0.79),而 DAS28 或 RAPID3R 仅具有中度一致性(79.9%-85.8%,κ 值 0.46-0.55)。

结论

根据 CDAI 和 RAPID3R+SJ1 缓解,而不是 DAS28 或 RAPID3R 缓解,与 ACR/EULAR 标准相似。RAPID3 评分需要对关节进行仔细的补充检查才能做出临床决策,不排除正式的关节计数或其他指数,并且在繁忙的临床环境中可能有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验