• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术作为门诊手术的可行性。

Feasibility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as an outpatient procedure.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2011 Jan;75(1):145-8; discussion 43-4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.015
PMID:21492679
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures are increasingly being managed on an outpatient basis. Currently there are no definitive guidelines within the literature that delineate which patient population can safely be managed as such. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that ACDF procedures, within a selective patient population at our institution, can be safely performed on an outpatient basis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review within one physician's practice of patients undergoing instrumented ACDF procedures using allograft. This sample included 117 patients who underwent one- and two-level ACDF procedures from November 2005 to April 2009. Hospital length of stay and hospital readmissions were noted. Complication rates in the outpatient population were assessed to determine the feasibility of outpatient management for selective patients undergoing ACDF procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients (50%) were treated on an outpatient basis. Sixty-eight patients underwent single level ACDF procedures, 38 patients (56%) of which were discharged on the same day. Forty-nine patients underwent two-level ACDF procedures, 21 patients (43%) of which were discharged on the same day. There was one complication (1.4%) in patients who were discharged on the same day. That patient required readmission for 23-hour observation secondary to neck swelling.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF procedures involving single and two-level fusions can safely be performed on an outpatient basis. Complication rates associated with this procedure are low, with critical postoperative complications involving respiratory compromise occurring very infrequently and in the immediate postoperative period.

摘要

背景

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)越来越多地在门诊进行管理。目前,文献中没有明确的指南来划定哪些患者群体可以安全地进行门诊管理。本研究的目的是证明在我们机构的选择性患者群体中,ACDF 手术可以安全地在门诊进行。

方法

这是一位医生的实践中的回顾性图表审查,对使用同种异体移植物进行器械性 ACDF 手术的患者进行研究。该样本包括 2005 年 11 月至 2009 年 4 月期间进行一至二级 ACDF 手术的 117 名患者。记录了住院时间和住院再入院情况。评估门诊患者的并发症发生率,以确定选择性 ACDF 手术患者门诊管理的可行性。

结果

共有 59 名患者(50%)接受门诊治疗。68 名患者接受了单节段 ACDF 手术,其中 38 名患者(56%)当天出院。49 名患者接受了双节段 ACDF 手术,其中 21 名患者(43%)当天出院。当天出院的患者中有 1 例并发症(1.4%)。该患者因颈部肿胀需要再次住院观察 23 小时。

结论

涉及单节段和双节段融合的 ACDF 手术可以安全地在门诊进行。与该手术相关的并发症发生率较低,与呼吸功能障碍相关的关键术后并发症非常罕见,且发生在术后即刻。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as an outpatient procedure.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术作为门诊手术的可行性。
World Neurosurg. 2011 Jan;75(1):145-8; discussion 43-4. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.015.
2
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.门诊日间手术环境下与住院环境下的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:1000例连续病例分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):878-84. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE14284. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
3
The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除及融合术的安全性。
Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.009. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
4
Retrospective single-surgeon study of 1123 consecutive cases of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of clinical outcome parameters, complication rates, and costs between outpatient and inpatient surgery groups, with a literature review.对1123例连续的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术病例进行的单外科医生回顾性研究:门诊手术组与住院手术组临床结果参数、并发症发生率及费用的比较,并附文献综述
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jun;28(6):630-641. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17938. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
5
Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with plate fixation as an outpatient procedure.前路颈椎减压融合术并钢板固定作为门诊手术。
Spine J. 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.01.011.
6
Safety of Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):30-45. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy636.
7
Comparison of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Outpatient Setting.门诊环境下两级颈椎间盘置换与两级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 May 15;46(10):658-664. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003871.
8
Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术与更高的翻修手术和围手术期并发症风险相关:一项基于大型全国性数据库的分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验比较 PCM 颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术。美国 FDA IDE 临床试验 2 年结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E907-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318296232f.
10
Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除融合术
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007 Aug;36(8):429-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Airway Compromise in Adults Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后气道受压:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 Aug 7;10(4):e70215. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70215. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术领域被引频次最高的100篇文章的文献计量分析
J Pain Res. 2022 Oct 11;15:3137-3156. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S375720. eCollection 2022.
3
Recoup From Home? Comparison of Relative Cost Savings for ACDF, Lumbar Discectomy, and Short Segment Fusion Performed in the Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.
在家康复?住院与门诊环境下进行的颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术、腰椎间盘切除术和短节段融合术的相对成本节约比较。
Global Spine J. 2021 Apr;11(1_suppl):56S-65S. doi: 10.1177/2192568220968772.
4
Low Complication Rate of Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center.门诊手术中心腰椎前路手术的低并发症发生率
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):687-693. doi: 10.14444/7100. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
Comparison of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed in an Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.住院与门诊环境下进行的多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。
Global Spine J. 2019 Dec;9(8):834-842. doi: 10.1177/2192568219834894. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Same-Day Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion-Our Protocol and Experience: Same-Day Discharge After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Suitable Patients has Similarly Low Readmission Rates as Admitted Patients.同日颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术——我们的方案与经验:在合适的患者中,颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后同日出院的再入院率与住院患者相似,均较低。
Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Oct 31;13(5):479-485. doi: 10.14444/6064. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Safety of 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Performed in an Ambulatory Surgery Setting With Same-day Discharge.在门诊手术环境中进行当日出院的二级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的安全性。
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Apr;32(3):E153-E159. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000753.
8
Safety and Efficiency of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Ambulatory Surgery Centers vs. Hospital Settings.门诊手术中心与医院环境下颈椎间盘置换术的安全性和有效性
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Oct 15;12(5):557-564. doi: 10.14444/5068. eCollection 2018 Oct.
9
A Comparison of Narcotic Consumption Between Hospital and Ambulatory-Based Surgery Centers Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后医院与门诊手术中心麻醉药物使用量的比较。
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Oct 15;12(5):595-602. doi: 10.14444/5075. eCollection 2018 Oct.
10
Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.门诊前路颈椎间盘切除术和融合术与更高的翻修手术和围手术期并发症风险相关:一项基于大型全国性数据库的分析。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.