• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证适用于聋或重听青年的生活质量衡量标准。

Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul;145(1):137-45. doi: 10.1177/0194599810397604.

DOI:10.1177/0194599810397604
PMID:21493349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4199826/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Quality-of-life (QOL) measures targeting youth with hearing loss are useful in population needs assessment, educational placement, and program design and evaluation. This study assesses the cross-sectional validity of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing Module (YQOL-DHH). STUDY DESIGN. Instrument development and cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Recruitment through schools, professional organizations, clinics, and programs for youth who are deaf or hard of hearing. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-five candidate items were administered to 230 adolescents aged 11 to 18 years: 49% female, 61% white, 11% mild hearing loss, 20% moderate/moderate-severe, 41% severe/profound, and 28% with cochlear implants. Participants completed individual or group-administered questionnaires by paper and pencil (58%), Web-based English (29%), American Sign Language (ASL) or Pidgin Signed English (PSE) (9%) on DVD, or interviewer-supervised ASL or PSE DVD (4%). The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-S) was also completed. Factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and respondent burden were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two items were retained in the final instrument covering 3 domains: self-acceptance/advocacy (14 items, Cronbach α = 0.84), perceived stigma (8 items, Cronbach α = 0.85), and participation (10 items, Cronbach α = 0.86). QOL was not significantly associated with hearing level. One-week test-retest coefficients were acceptable: self-acceptance/ advocacy (0.70), perceived stigma (0.78), and participation 0.92). As predicted, the total CDI-S score was associated in the appropriate direction (P < .0001) with all YQOL-DHH domains. Time to complete the paper-and-pencil version was 12 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The YQOL-DHH shows good reliability and validity for assessing hearing-specific QOL in adolescents.

摘要

目的

针对听力损失青少年的生活质量(QOL)测量工具在人群需求评估、教育安置以及计划设计和评估中非常有用。本研究评估了青少年听力损失生活质量工具-耳聋和重听模块(YQOL-DHH)的横断面有效性。

研究设计

仪器开发和横断面调查。

地点

通过学校、专业组织、诊所和聋人或重听青少年项目进行招募。

受试者和方法

35 项候选项目被施用于 230 名 11 至 18 岁的青少年:49%为女性,61%为白人,11%为轻度听力损失,20%为中度/中重度,41%为重度/极重度,28%为人工耳蜗植入者。参与者通过纸笔(58%)、基于 Web 的英语(29%)、美国手语(ASL)或洋泾浜签名英语(PSE)(9%)在 DVD 上或由采访者监督的 ASL 或 PSE DVD(4%)完成个人或小组问卷。还完成了儿童抑郁量表(CDI-S)。评估了因子结构、信度、结构有效性和受访者负担。

结果

最终仪器保留了 32 项涵盖 3 个领域的项目:自我接受/倡导(14 项,Cronbach α = 0.84)、感知耻辱(8 项,Cronbach α = 0.85)和参与(10 项,Cronbach α = 0.86)。生活质量与听力水平无显著相关性。一周内的测试-重测系数可接受:自我接受/倡导(0.70)、感知耻辱(0.78)和参与(0.92)。正如预测的那样,总 CDI-S 分数与 YQOL-DHH 的所有领域都呈适当方向相关(P <.0001)。纸笔版完成时间为 12 分钟。

结论

YQOL-DHH 显示出良好的可靠性和有效性,可用于评估青少年听力特异性生活质量。

相似文献

1
Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth.验证适用于聋或重听青年的生活质量衡量标准。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul;145(1):137-45. doi: 10.1177/0194599810397604.
2
Quality of life in youth with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss.青年重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失患者的生活质量。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Mar;139(3):294-300. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.35.
3
School placement and perceived quality of life in youth who are deaf or hard of hearing.失聪或听力障碍青少年的学校安置与感知生活质量
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2013 Jan;18(1):47-61. doi: 10.1093/deafed/ens039. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
4
Preliminary Validation of Stigma Measures Among Parents of Children Who Are d/Deaf or Hard of Hearing in the United States and Ghana.美国和加纳聋儿或重听儿童家长污名量表的初步验证。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(Suppl 1):26S-34S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001471. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
5
Deaf adolescents' quality of life: a questionnaire in Italian Sign Language.聋青少年的生活质量:意大利手语问卷。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Sep 20;29(4):510-516. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae025.
6
Measuring the psychosocial consequences of hearing loss in a working adult population: focus on validity and reliability of the Italian translation of the hearing handicap inventory.测量在职成年人群听力损失的心理社会后果:聚焦听力障碍量表意大利语翻译的效度和信度。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007 Aug;27(4):186-91.
7
Preliminary Validation of Measures of Experienced, Perceived, and Internalized Stigma Among Adults Who Are d/Deaf or Hard of Hearing in the United States and Ghana.美国和加纳聋人或重听成年人经历的、感知到的和内化的污名化的衡量标准的初步验证。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(Suppl 1):17S-25S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001476. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
8
Health related quality of life in adolescent cochlear implant users.青少年人工耳蜗使用者的健康相关生活质量。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Jul;21(4):198-205. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1724676. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
9
Reading the signs: impact of signed versus written questionnaires on the prevalence of psychopathology among deaf adolescents.解读信号:手语问卷与书面问卷对失聪青少年精神病理学患病率的影响
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;40(8):665-73. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01866.x.
10
Measurement properties of the Chinese version of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Weight Module (YQOL-W).中文版青少年生活质量量表-体重模块(YQOL-W)的测量属性。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e109221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109221. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and assessment of the health-related quality of life scale for children with hearing loss in China.中国听力损失儿童健康相关生活质量量表的研制与评估
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21240-y.
2
Development of Measures for d/Deaf and Hard of Hearing Stigma: Introduction to the Special Supplement on Stigma Measurement Tools.聋人/重听污名化措施的制定:关于污名化测量工具的特刊介绍。
Ear Hear. 2024;45(Suppl 1):4S-16S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001543. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
3
American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.美国人工耳蜗植入联盟儿童人工耳蜗植入候选者评估指南
Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):268-282. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001087.
4
Italian Version of the YQOL-DHH Questionnaire: Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation.《YQOL-DHH问卷的意大利语版本:翻译与跨文化调适》
OTO Open. 2021 Dec 12;5(4):2473974X211065433. doi: 10.1177/2473974X211065433. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
5
Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Life Quality in children and adolescents in Norwegian Sign Language.挪威手语儿童生活质量量表的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2021 May 27;9(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00590-x.
6
PROMIS-deaf profile measure: cultural adaptation and psychometric validation in American sign language.PROMIS聋人概况测量:美国手语的文化适应性和心理测量学验证
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Jun 9;4(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00208-7.
7
Improving transition outcomes in adolescents with permanent hearing loss.改善永久性听力损失青少年的过渡结果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 21;8(2):e000336. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000336. eCollection 2019.
8
Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Ear Conditions: The EAR-Q.一种用于耳部疾病的新型患者报告结局指标的开发:EAR-Q。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Aug 7;6(8):e1842. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001842. eCollection 2018 Aug.
9
Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments for Children With Cochlear Implants: Development of Child and Parent-Proxy Measures.用于人工耳蜗植入儿童的健康相关生活质量工具:儿童和家长代理测量工具的开发。
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):592-604. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000631.
10
Caregiver-Reported Indicators of Communication and Social Functioning for Young Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.照顾者报告的失聪或听力障碍幼儿沟通与社交功能指标。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018 Jul 1;23(3):200-208. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eny006.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content.COSMIN 清单用于评估测量特性研究的方法学质量:对其内容的澄清。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
3
Correlates of psychosocial adjustment in deaf adolescents with and without cochlear implants: a preliminary investigation.有或无人工耳蜗植入的失聪青少年心理社会适应的相关因素:一项初步调查。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009 Spring;14(2):244-59. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enn038. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
4
Measuring health-related quality of life after pediatric cochlear implantation: a systematic review.小儿人工耳蜗植入术后健康相关生活质量的测量:一项系统综述。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Oct;70(10):1695-706. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jun 27.
5
Health-related quality of life of Austrian children and adolescents with cochlear implants.奥地利植入人工耳蜗的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Aug;69(8):1089-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.02.018. Epub 2005 Apr 7.
6
Validation of a parent outcome questionnaire from pediatric cochlear implantation.儿童人工耳蜗植入家长结局问卷的验证
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Fall;10(4):330-56. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni027. Epub 2005 Jun 2.
7
Parent-reported health-related quality of life in children with congenital hearing loss: a population study.
Ambul Pediatr. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):411-7. doi: 10.1367/A03-191R.1.
8
Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: a prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program.评估人工耳蜗植入对健康相关生活质量的影响:一项成人人工耳蜗植入项目的前瞻性研究。
Int J Audiol. 2004 Apr;43(4):183-92. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050026.
9
Outcomes of children with mild-profound congenital hearing loss at 7 to 8 years: a population study.7至8岁先天性轻-重度听力损失儿童的结局:一项群体研究。
Ear Hear. 2004 Feb;25(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000111262.12219.2F.
10
Adolescent quality of life, part II: initial validation of a new instrument.青少年生活质量,第二部分:一种新工具的初步验证
J Adolesc. 2002 Jun;25(3):287-300. doi: 10.1006/jado.2002.0471.