Suppr超能文献

验证适用于聋或重听青年的生活质量衡量标准。

Validation of a quality-of-life measure for deaf or hard of hearing youth.

机构信息

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul;145(1):137-45. doi: 10.1177/0194599810397604.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Quality-of-life (QOL) measures targeting youth with hearing loss are useful in population needs assessment, educational placement, and program design and evaluation. This study assesses the cross-sectional validity of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Deaf and Hard of Hearing Module (YQOL-DHH). STUDY DESIGN. Instrument development and cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Recruitment through schools, professional organizations, clinics, and programs for youth who are deaf or hard of hearing. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-five candidate items were administered to 230 adolescents aged 11 to 18 years: 49% female, 61% white, 11% mild hearing loss, 20% moderate/moderate-severe, 41% severe/profound, and 28% with cochlear implants. Participants completed individual or group-administered questionnaires by paper and pencil (58%), Web-based English (29%), American Sign Language (ASL) or Pidgin Signed English (PSE) (9%) on DVD, or interviewer-supervised ASL or PSE DVD (4%). The Children's Depression Inventory (CDI-S) was also completed. Factor structure, reliability, construct validity, and respondent burden were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two items were retained in the final instrument covering 3 domains: self-acceptance/advocacy (14 items, Cronbach α = 0.84), perceived stigma (8 items, Cronbach α = 0.85), and participation (10 items, Cronbach α = 0.86). QOL was not significantly associated with hearing level. One-week test-retest coefficients were acceptable: self-acceptance/ advocacy (0.70), perceived stigma (0.78), and participation 0.92). As predicted, the total CDI-S score was associated in the appropriate direction (P < .0001) with all YQOL-DHH domains. Time to complete the paper-and-pencil version was 12 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The YQOL-DHH shows good reliability and validity for assessing hearing-specific QOL in adolescents.

摘要

目的

针对听力损失青少年的生活质量(QOL)测量工具在人群需求评估、教育安置以及计划设计和评估中非常有用。本研究评估了青少年听力损失生活质量工具-耳聋和重听模块(YQOL-DHH)的横断面有效性。

研究设计

仪器开发和横断面调查。

地点

通过学校、专业组织、诊所和聋人或重听青少年项目进行招募。

受试者和方法

35 项候选项目被施用于 230 名 11 至 18 岁的青少年:49%为女性,61%为白人,11%为轻度听力损失,20%为中度/中重度,41%为重度/极重度,28%为人工耳蜗植入者。参与者通过纸笔(58%)、基于 Web 的英语(29%)、美国手语(ASL)或洋泾浜签名英语(PSE)(9%)在 DVD 上或由采访者监督的 ASL 或 PSE DVD(4%)完成个人或小组问卷。还完成了儿童抑郁量表(CDI-S)。评估了因子结构、信度、结构有效性和受访者负担。

结果

最终仪器保留了 32 项涵盖 3 个领域的项目:自我接受/倡导(14 项,Cronbach α = 0.84)、感知耻辱(8 项,Cronbach α = 0.85)和参与(10 项,Cronbach α = 0.86)。生活质量与听力水平无显著相关性。一周内的测试-重测系数可接受:自我接受/倡导(0.70)、感知耻辱(0.78)和参与(0.92)。正如预测的那样,总 CDI-S 分数与 YQOL-DHH 的所有领域都呈适当方向相关(P <.0001)。纸笔版完成时间为 12 分钟。

结论

YQOL-DHH 显示出良好的可靠性和有效性,可用于评估青少年听力特异性生活质量。

相似文献

8
Health related quality of life in adolescent cochlear implant users.青少年人工耳蜗使用者的健康相关生活质量。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Jul;21(4):198-205. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2020.1724676. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

7
Improving transition outcomes in adolescents with permanent hearing loss.改善永久性听力损失青少年的过渡结果。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 21;8(2):e000336. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000336. eCollection 2019.
8
Development of a New Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Ear Conditions: The EAR-Q.一种用于耳部疾病的新型患者报告结局指标的开发:EAR-Q。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Aug 7;6(8):e1842. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001842. eCollection 2018 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
6
Validation of a parent outcome questionnaire from pediatric cochlear implantation.儿童人工耳蜗植入家长结局问卷的验证
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Fall;10(4):330-56. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni027. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验