Suppr超能文献

两种激光多普勒血流仪的对比研究

Comparative study of two laser Doppler blood flowmeters.

作者信息

Barnett N J, Dougherty G, Pettinger S J

机构信息

School of Engineering, Oxford Polytechnic, Headington, UK.

出版信息

J Med Eng Technol. 1990 Nov-Dec;14(6):243-9. doi: 10.3109/03091909009015431.

Abstract

A new infrared laser Doppler blood flow instrument (Moor MBF3D) was evaluated using an in vitro model allowing measurements over a range of flow velocities and concentrations. The responses correlated well (r = 0.96, p less than 0.01) with those obtained simultaneously using a Perimed PF3 laser Doppler instrument. The different processing bandwidths of the instruments were investigated and the wideband mode of operation is recommended for flow measurements where there may be fast moving red blood cells (rbcs). The infrared instrument is capable of dual-channel operation, and the two channels are shown to respond almost identically for similar changes in blood flow through the in vitro model (r = 0.999, p less than 0.01). The main advantage of the dual-channel instrument is that continuous measurements may be made simultaneously at two different skin sites allowing dynamic flow responses to be compared.

摘要

使用体外模型对一种新型红外激光多普勒血流仪(Moor MBF3D)进行了评估,该模型能够在一系列流速和浓度范围内进行测量。其响应与同时使用Perimed PF3激光多普勒仪获得的响应具有良好的相关性(r = 0.96,p < 0.01)。研究了仪器不同的处理带宽,对于可能存在快速移动红细胞(RBC)的血流测量,建议采用宽带操作模式。该红外仪器能够进行双通道操作,通过体外模型显示,对于血流的类似变化,两个通道的响应几乎相同(r = 0.999,p < 0.01)。双通道仪器的主要优点是可以同时在两个不同的皮肤部位进行连续测量,从而能够比较动态血流响应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验