Vongsavan N, Matthews B
Department of Physiology, University of Bristol.
Exp Physiol. 1993 Jan;78(1):1-14. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1993.sp003664.
Laser Doppler flow meters are used to provide continuous records of blood flow in tissues. An account is given of their principles of operation and of the differences between two of the commercially available instruments: the Periflux model PF3 and the Moor blood flow monitor model MBF3D. The Periflux tended to have higher noise levels and to drift more than the Moor. The principal disadvantage of these instruments is that they cannot be calibrated in absolute units of blood flow. It is suggested that the method of standardization adopted for the Periflux be used with other machines, based on the signal produced by the Brownian motion of a 0.5% suspension of 0.48 micron diameter polystyrene microspheres at 20 degrees C. The signal representing zero flow in a tissue can be obtained by recording with the same light intensity from a stationary reflector. In model systems the instruments are linear with red cell volume fractions up to only 1%, which is below that likely to be encountered in many tissues. The effects of ambient light and the origin of movement artifacts are also considered.
激光多普勒血流仪用于提供组织中血流的连续记录。本文介绍了其工作原理以及两种市售仪器之间的差异:Periflux型号PF3和Moor血流监测仪型号MBF3D。与Moor仪器相比,Periflux往往具有更高的噪声水平且漂移更大。这些仪器的主要缺点是它们不能以血流的绝对单位进行校准。建议将Periflux采用的标准化方法应用于其他仪器,该方法基于直径为0.48微米的聚苯乙烯微球0.5%悬浮液在20摄氏度下布朗运动产生的信号。通过用相同光强记录来自固定反射器的信号,可以获得表示组织中零血流的信号。在模型系统中,这些仪器在红细胞体积分数高达1%时才呈线性,而这一比例低于许多组织中可能遇到的比例。文中还考虑了环境光的影响以及运动伪影的来源。