Environmental Research Institute of Jahade Daneshgahi, Jahade Daneshgahi, Rasht, Guilan, Iran.
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Mar;184(3):1221-30. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2034-6. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
Regarding various types of pollutant, waste management requires high attention. Environmental site selection study, prior to landfill operation, and subsequently, monitoring and maintaining of the location, are of foremost points in landfill site selection process. By means of these studies, it is possible to control the undesirable impacts caused by landfills. Study ahead aims at examination of effectiveness of a new method called Monavari 95-2 in landfill site assessment. For this purpose, two landfills Rasht and Andisheh, which are, respectively, located on humid and arid areas, were selected as case studies. Then, the results obtained from both sites were compared with each other to find out the weaknesses and strengths of each site. Compared with others similar methods, much more criteria (53 parameters) can be considered within this method, so the results will be more calculable. According to this method, Rasht landfill (site H) is classified as unacceptable landfill site i.e. there is an urgent need for a new suitable site for landfill, while Andishe Landfill (site D) is ranked as acceptable landfill site but needs environmental management program to handle the existing weaknesses.
关于各种类型的污染物，废物管理需要高度重视。在进行垃圾填埋场运营之前，需要进行环境选址研究，随后还需要对垃圾填埋场进行监测和维护，这是垃圾填埋场选址过程中的重中之重。通过这些研究，可以控制垃圾填埋场带来的不良影响。本研究旨在检验一种名为 Monavari 95-2 的新方法在垃圾填埋场评估中的有效性。为此，选择了两个垃圾填埋场 Rasht 和 Andisheh 作为案例研究，它们分别位于湿润和干旱地区。然后，将这两个场地的结果进行比较，以找出每个场地的优缺点。与其他类似方法相比，该方法可以考虑更多的标准（53 个参数），因此结果更具可计算性。根据该方法，Rasht 垃圾填埋场（场地 H）被归类为不可接受的垃圾填埋场，即急需一个新的合适的垃圾填埋场，而 Andishe 垃圾填埋场（场地 D）则被归类为可接受的垃圾填埋场，但需要环境管理计划来处理现有弱点。
