• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[急性骨骼肌疾病的局部治疗。1%吡罗昔康乳膏与1%双氯芬酸乳胶剂对比研究结果]

[Topical therapy of acute skeletal muscle diseases. Results of a comparative study on piroxicam cream 1% versus diclofenac emulgel 1%].

作者信息

Arioli G, Scaramelli M, Pillosu W

机构信息

Servizio di Recupero e Rieducazione Funzionale, U.S.L.L. 49 di Suzzara.

出版信息

Clin Ter. 1990 Sep 30;134(6):363-9.

PMID:2149533
Abstract

An open comparative study on 75 patients with the aim to compare efficacy and safety of two non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs for topic use, piroxicam 1% cream (38 patients) and diclofenac 1% emulgel (37 patients) in the acute musculoskeletal disorders (tendinitis, distortion, muscular disorders etc.) has been carried out. Piroxicam has been administered at the dose of 0.5-1 g cream and diclofenac at the dose of 4 g emulgel, both 4 times a day for a period of 14 days. At baseline, 3rd, 7th and 14th days were evaluated: pain on movement, on pressure, function restriction, and the global evolution of symptomatology; at the end of the treatment the patient gave an evaluation on the physical characteristics of the two drugs, and the physician and the patients gave also global evaluation of efficacy and safety. The statistical analysis of the quantitative data (ANOVA and Student's t-tests) and qualitative data (Wilcoxon's test, chi 2 - and Fisher-tests) showed a significative reduction of pain on movement and of function's capacity at 3rd day, of pain on pressure and of function restriction on 7th day with both drugs with a superiority of piroxicam for some of the above mentioned parameters (7th and 14th days). Also the evaluation of the physical characteristics and the global evaluation of efficacy were more favourable for piroxicam. No adverse systemic or local reactions are reported for both drugs.

摘要

对75例患者进行了一项开放性比较研究,旨在比较两种局部使用的非甾体抗炎药——1%吡罗昔康乳膏(38例患者)和1%双氯芬酸乳胶剂(37例患者)治疗急性肌肉骨骼疾病(肌腱炎、扭伤、肌肉疾病等)的疗效和安全性。吡罗昔康的给药剂量为0.5 - 1 g乳膏,双氯芬酸的给药剂量为4 g乳胶剂,均为每日4次,疗程为14天。在基线、第3天、第7天和第14天进行评估:运动时疼痛、按压时疼痛、功能受限情况以及症状的总体演变;治疗结束时,患者对两种药物的物理特性进行评价,医生和患者也对疗效和安全性进行总体评价。对定量数据(方差分析和学生t检验)和定性数据(威尔科克森检验、卡方检验和费舍尔检验)的统计分析表明,两种药物在第3天时运动时疼痛和功能能力均有显著降低,在第7天时按压时疼痛和功能受限均有显著降低,在上述一些参数方面(第7天和第14天)吡罗昔康更具优势。此外,吡罗昔康在物理特性评价和疗效总体评价方面更具优势。两种药物均未报告有不良全身或局部反应。

相似文献

1
[Topical therapy of acute skeletal muscle diseases. Results of a comparative study on piroxicam cream 1% versus diclofenac emulgel 1%].[急性骨骼肌疾病的局部治疗。1%吡罗昔康乳膏与1%双氯芬酸乳胶剂对比研究结果]
Clin Ter. 1990 Sep 30;134(6):363-9.
2
A clinical evaluation of piroxicam gel: an open comparative trial with diclofenac gel in the treatment of acute musculoskeletal disorders.
Clin Ther. 1989 May-Jun;11(3):382-91.
3
[Fast-dissolving sublingual tablets of piroxicam versus naproxen in the treatment of recurrent acute osteoarthrosis. Multicenter clinical trial].吡罗昔康与萘普生速溶舌下片治疗复发性急性骨关节炎的多中心临床试验
Minerva Med. 1994 Mar;85(3):89-96.
4
Piroxicam fast-dissolving dosage form vs diclofenac sodium in the treatment of acute renal colic: a double-blind controlled trial.吡罗昔康速溶剂型与双氯芬酸钠治疗急性肾绞痛的对比:一项双盲对照试验
Br J Urol. 1998 Jan;81(1):27-30.
5
[Piroxicam gel versus diclofenac gel in active gonarthroses].[吡罗昔康凝胶与双氯芬酸凝胶治疗活动性膝关节炎的比较]
Fortschr Med. 1989 Jul 30;107(22):485-8.
6
Efficacy and safety of a topical diclofenac solution (pennsaid) in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial.双氯芬酸溶液(佩恩赛德)局部治疗膝原发性骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、赋形剂对照临床试验。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Oct 11;164(18):2017-23. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.18.2017.
7
Intramuscular piroxicam versus intramuscular diclofenac sodium in the treatment of acute renal colic: double-blind study.肌肉注射吡罗昔康与肌肉注射双氯芬酸钠治疗急性肾绞痛的双盲研究。
Eur J Med Res. 1999 Jan 26;4(1):23-6.
8
[Diclofenac 75mg. and 30 mg. orfenadine (Neodolpasse) versus placebo and piroxicam in postoperative analgesia after arthroscopy].双氯芬酸75毫克和30毫克奥洛他定(Neodolpasse)与安慰剂和吡罗昔康用于关节镜检查术后镇痛的比较
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2004;71(2):80-3.
9
Equivalence study of a topical diclofenac solution (pennsaid) compared with oral diclofenac in symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial.局部用双氯芬酸溶液(佩恩赛德)与口服双氯芬酸治疗膝骨关节炎症状的等效性研究:一项随机对照试验。
J Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;31(10):2002-12.
10
Topical versus systemic diclofenac in the treatment of temporo-mandibular joint dysfunction symptoms.局部用双氯芬酸与全身用双氯芬酸治疗颞下颌关节功能障碍症状的比较。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2004 Oct;24(5):279-83.