Pirnay Jean-Paul, Verween Gunther, Pascual Bruno, Verbeken Gilbert, De Corte Peter, Rose Thomas, Jennes Serge, Vanderkelen Alain, Marichal Miriam, Heuninckx Walter, De Vos Daniel
Human Cell and Tissue Banks, Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Technology, Burn Wound Centre, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Cell Tissue Bank. 2012 Jun;13(2):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s10561-011-9256-2. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
Viable donor skin is still considered the gold standard for the temporary covering of burns. Since 1985, the Brussels military skin bank supplies cryopreserved viable cadaveric skin for therapeutic use. Unfortunately, viable skin can not be sterilised, which increases the risk of disease transmission. On the other hand, every effort should be made to ensure that the largest possible part of the donated skin is processed into high-performance grafts. Cryopreserved skin allografts that fail bacterial or fungal screening are reworked into 'sterile' non-viable glycerolised skin allografts. The transposition of the European Human Cell and Tissue Directives into Belgian Law has prompted us to install a pragmatic microbiological screening and acceptance procedure, which is based on 14 day enrichment broth cultures of finished product samples and treats the complex issues of 'acceptable bioburden' and 'absence of objectionable organisms'. In this paper we evaluate this procedure applied on 148 skin donations. An incubation time of 14 days allowed for the detection of an additional 16.9% (25/148) of contaminated skin compared to our classic 3 day incubation protocol and consequently increased the share of non-viable glycerolised skin with 8.4%. Importantly, 24% of these slow-growing microorganisms were considered to be potentially pathogenic. In addition, we raise the issue of 'representative sampling' of heterogeneously contaminated skin. In summary, we feel that our present microbiological testing and acceptance procedure assures adequate patient safety and skin availability. The question remains, however, whether the supposed increased safety of our skin grafts outweighs the reduced overall clinical performance and the increase in work load and costs.
有活力的供体皮肤仍然被认为是烧伤临时覆盖的金标准。自1985年以来,布鲁塞尔军事皮肤库提供冷冻保存的有活力的尸体皮肤用于治疗。不幸的是,有活力的皮肤无法进行消毒,这增加了疾病传播的风险。另一方面,应尽一切努力确保将捐赠皮肤的最大可能部分加工成高性能移植物。未通过细菌或真菌筛查的冷冻保存同种异体皮肤被重新加工成“无菌”无活力的甘油化同种异体皮肤。欧洲人类细胞和组织指令转化为比利时法律促使我们建立了一个实用的微生物筛查和验收程序,该程序基于成品样品14天的富集肉汤培养,并处理“可接受的生物负荷”和“无有害生物”的复杂问题。在本文中,我们评估了应用于148次皮肤捐赠的该程序。与我们经典的3天培养方案相比,14天的培养时间可检测出另外16.9%(25/148)的受污染皮肤,从而使无活力的甘油化皮肤的比例增加了8.4%。重要的是,这些生长缓慢的微生物中有24%被认为具有潜在致病性。此外,我们提出了异质性污染皮肤“代表性采样”的问题。总之,我们认为我们目前的微生物检测和验收程序可确保患者的充分安全和皮肤供应。然而,问题仍然存在,即我们的皮肤移植物所谓的安全性提高是否超过了整体临床性能的降低以及工作量和成本的增加。